Motorin'

It's Channing Crowder speaking, not our Crowder... Who cares what that guy has to say.

They're trying to explain the color coded matrix outcome for playoff seeding to him as we speak 😁

The NFL appears to be saying that since the Bills and Bengals both played the same amount of games, it doesn't matter. The record determines the seeding... But the fairest thing in that scenario, imo, is a neutral field.

No, bc if KC loses this week they couldn't have been the 1 seed even if the Bills were given an L for the Bengals game. The neutral field senario only applies when it's two teams that played a different amount for games AND both could have been the higher seed depending on the outcome of the canceled game.

Yeah, whatever is best for him is the only thing that matters.

It makes total sense that we'd hope he's healthy enough to walk out on the field on Sunday. But it might take more time, and that's ok too.

I think the neutral site should also apply for the Bengals v Ravens playoff if the Ravens win Sunday. Why? Because it's a fair way to deal with an indeterminate outcome. We don't know who won the AFC North because the season was incomplete. So rather than deciding by an arbitrary flip of the coin, play on an even field and give each team half of the tickets. That's also why the neutral site AFCCG makes sense, because the most likely senario is we won't know who actually won the #1 seed. It's incomplete. You give the bye to the team that's leading, because there is only one to give. But if two teams face each other that could have won the #1 seed based on an incomplete result, play on an even field and give each team half of the seats.

This is as good of news as anything anyone could have hoped for! Thank God.

Cause you're the team that has 4 losses. It's not perfect. And if for some reason you lose to the Ravens I think that game should be on a neutral site.

Pittsburgh

I don't think there's anyway you lose to the Ravens.

There's no chance of them playing on the road if they beat the Ravens.

Duh, cause there'd be 5 teams left after Wild Card Week.

Make it 8 teams, top 2 get a bye. And if the Bills and Chiefs play it should be on a neutral field in the AFCCG.

His doctors stressed that he has not been diagnosed with anything yet. They still have many tests to run in order to rule out numerous possibilities before they arrive at the answer.

Also heard the suggestion of expanding to 8 teams and the top 2 get the bye.

That's funny. And at the same time, he's really the only one that didn't know what had happened to him.

What are the chances of KC tying? If KC ends up 14-3, and we end up 13-3, I think KC should get the bye. But championship game between Buffalo and KC should be held on a neutral field.

A tie reduces your overall winning percentage. So a team that 12-4 is a head of a team that's 12-4-1... Meaning a tie is as good as a loss when the teams have not played the same number of games.

If the Ravens beat the Bengals this week, and if they end up being the Wild Card matchup, then I think it would be most fair that the game be played on a neutral site since the result of the Bills v Bengals would have determined the AFC North winner. That would be rendered moot if the Bengals win.

I realized that.

The Bengals have said they chose not to play Monday night, and they chose what ever the Bills want to do. Unless we hear the Bills say they want to play the Bengals, I don't see that being a reality.

If the Bills haven't played all of their games and could win the #1 seed, then KC did n't earn Home Field advantage either. It's a reasonable solution.

I don't understand why you think this is for you to say. If we hear that from the Bills, great. But we haven't heard from them. This kind of sentiment about how the Bills should or shouldn't respond is misguided.

Yeah, there's nothing that Tee did wrong.