y2zipper

I think he was just playing the draft order.

Watching this year's postseason makes me think that the answer to this question is that I want to have a dynamic skill player somewhere on my offense without a preference for what position that player plays. Obviously the trenches are an important area, but to me the offensive and defensive lines and pass rush are largely products of group play. I think that it's the piece that a lot of the lower end and a lot of the losing playoff teams don't have that some of the better playoff teams do. Indianapolis Pittsburgh and the Rams come to mind as playoff teams that have good offenses in good quarterbacks and good offensive players, But they don't have a really really dynamic physical skill player. Like Cleveland has Nick Chubb, Buffalo has Diggs, Green Bay has Adams, and Kansas City and New Orleans are both teams that have two of those with kamara and Thomas in New Orleans and Kelce and Hill in Kansas City.

I think Philadelphia's ownership is largely correct here and that Philadelphia does not really have a vision. And look to me like Peterson was managing that like a fan instead of trying to put something stable together and it just didn't work. Hurts to me didn't look much better than Wentz outside of his athleticism. That being said I think Peterson is an excellent fit for the Chargers job just because quarterback with the physical skills of Herbert fits with the game that he likes to play and because the vision for the Chargers is already there. I also think that particular job is in need of somebody with experience in order to manage game day. They just fired Anthony Lynn because they didn't like his decision making under fire and bringing in somebody who's never been a head coach before runs the risk of doing the same thing. Seeing all the names also makes me wonder which one of these candidates is not getting a job, especially considering that a lot of the college coaches haven't actually been talked about as candidates for anything.

I think it's incomplete. Not enough time between catch and hit.

Yeah, so let's take Brees out for a play... Lmao.

If our fumble doesn't get overturned that shouldn't.

If Tannys gonna throw that Vrabels decisions don't matter.

As long as Tennessee doesn't give up 7 they are in it and now they'll have 5 minutes and the ball.

Henry's done nothing.

Punting here is correct the way his defense is playing.

Both teams have prepared well for the opposite offense. Tennessee should go hard PA on 1st and look downfield.

That's a rough miss but it explains the deep shot.

They have size and can make contested catches. I like the matchup at the goal line here.

Yes! Tennessee is going to get opportunities because the Ravens are still playing one on one defense against the wideouts.

Ravens are where they want to be here.

Not for the Ravens. They need to run.

I play for points instead of ball control here. The Ravens have bad WRs though.

Jackson is Mike Vick with accuracy. Average passer, electric runner. He does miss reads sometimes and it's never going to be conventional but Baltimore knew that on draft day.

Baltimore is playing too much man to man here. That's too easy.

Excellent simulated pressures there.

They do but Tampa isn't getting behind the chains so they use faster plays. It's the same thing Rivers did vs. us.

The Bucs aren't that well-coached IMHO.

The divisions are there as a parity engine. You basically make the playoffs by being better than 3 other teams that you play a common schedule with. I prefer the 6 team playoff format to 7.

3.5 at home isn't much of a favorite. Seattle has serious personnel issues, though. They just don't have a high percentage offense and a bad line.

It happens because people here don't watch the league. Man, Seattle looks terrible today.