Buffarukus

serious question that may be a dilemma. many men accidentally get women pregnant. can a man assault a woman to cause a miscarriage and get no charges related to the outcome of the child? so only assault charges can be made because he did not kill anything that is considered alive. does this put many women in jeopardy because there are alot of POS out there that look at assault time will be less then 18+ years of responsibility? i ask this because i think the extremes used to take control of the conversation only but have been more routinely making laws. that and rarely is the left forced to view their ideas through a different lens. the exact way liberals feel about womens lives at this time is the way pro lifers feel about unborn children for decades. i think the left went from safe and rare into another realm that is dark and now the right is doing the same. the sad part is i think both have valid points and are done from a standpoint of empathy..for the most part but they only consider evil intentions. regardless how you feel your ethics will be challenged and it WILL become hypocritical at some point unless clear lines are drawn. nobody seems to want to do that. you say surely the right wants to prosecute women for murder. thats the logical conclusion. those same people have sat there and watched fully formed unequivocal human life be debated for termination simply because it did not leave the mother. until day of birth abortion is the logical conclusion to refusing life exists inside the womb. things are going to go to their conclusions in a polar way unless people call out their own side and stop only vilifying the other.

yeah i think. i was working. i think they threw it 2 times that game but brings up the point we need a D that can stuff the run because sometimes that's all either team can do in OUR weather. bengals had a good rushing attack in the playoff game we just lost as well. maybe we are sitting this rook with AJ but beyond this year alot of small speed lbs we are stacking for the future.

ne beat us with nothing but running attack. hall seems to be a stud that we didnt face due to injury and miami rb had his best game against us last year. speed is great but i hope the guy can stack and shed as well or josh and the new new tight end we just got arent going to see the field much. opponents are going to grind out the clock and see if josh can play a mistake free game.

lol. yeah im drinking a couple cases of bud light. i think they are putting liquor in them and calling them beer. jesus relax. im just killing time during the draft and i guess i am also watching you spaz for a joke that @ you. didnt know members were inflicting so much trauma putting your name in posts. 😳

you can @ me dude. i wont get all menstrual like @ChiGoose your up to 3 solicitors chi and growing. you should start a subscription service and profit off your board celebrity status. bags mugs. of coarse as soon as you make a good profit we take it back and redistribute it amongst all our members. just the way you communists would want. 😁

that is absurdity! everyone knows that play only works if the player spins clockwise. cook is right handed! now we need to use capital to move up to get the personel to run it which will def cost our next 5 picks. you just destroyed the team for the next decade.

do to the shakey foundation built by companies who got exclusive gov contracts.

really? bernard was a absolute shock to me. i thought he would devolop into a hybrid cb/lb for nickle pass downs as a third taking out maybe poyer as dumb as that sounds as i write it. a disrupter, not a lynchpin. maybe a Kelsey killer to man up with more size. never saw him as a full time starter. hey if he develops into more then a wrench to toss into packages thats great but for some reason he seems like a absolute liability in any run and def not a full time lb in our nickle only. i cant believe we didnt reach to get the best one in the draft in the first. not that i want that at all but seeing as mcd had luke to cement his career and they seemed so intrigued with Edmunds becoming that guy with ridiculous traits. i will be suprised if they let mlb in a primary nickle not be a stud out the gate. meaning rd 2 maybe another trade up just to do it. again, not that i advocate that. we still need competition upgrades for the o line. esp right tackle.

ok i think thats why im hesitant. we seemed locked into 11 and never seemed to get creative and by the halfway point we stalled out and had to bring back beasley just because dorsey needed a specific slot guy and could not get creative with pretty talented roster. im still down on dorsey. we seemed really excited for gilliams athleticism. not on the field much. both our our rb pass catch ability. rare. knox upside enough to give a nice contract. spotty production. invisible in games. im a huge fan of shakir and dorsey issues getting him involved. dorsey seemed to just go 4 guys in very specific roles, besides digs in slot because hes a athletic freak. so the rich getting richer when you cant use what you got has me skeptical. that and this teams absolute refusal to play rookies in the first place. now we get one in a position we are not weak. it really makes me nervous. i hope it works out the way you say instead of how it has actually been but thanks for the insight. i really think we should trade knox as much as that pains me. i just dont think his production will be worth the hefty contract now. hope im wrong but thanks for the info and optimism. i need it lol

wow good job. im warming up to it after watching film. this is def BPA. does this put knox on the bench more or is kincaid our #3 full time slot? im not mad at the pick if i had more confidence in dorsey. im not a fan of how he uses weopons and kincaid/knox combo i feel one is going to end up contributing nothing. if its knox that's alot of cap in the trash. dorsey just seems like he needs a vanilla offense with really good players at concrete positions. not alot of interesting shifts of roles happening in which i think both guys can eat.

i like this very much.

no. we look at evidence. tucker presented some. some that was hidden from you, me, and defense team...which is illegal. you refuse to ask simple questions based on it. you then go on to say it was bs or whatever when it lead to his freedom and dont blink a eye. if trump was in office. they arrested a redtail hawk for violence. cnn showed clips of you standing around. i said cnn is propaganda. i dont believe my lying eyes. let him rot. pretty sure you would feel diff for my unrelenting bias that doesn't even consider anything but my politics for conviction of the strongest degree. thats a disturbing place but i see by your downvote of that idea. your pretty far gone. have a good night and hope that situation is just a example.

im not. im saying being si biased you are perfectly fine prosecuting your "enemies" and dismissing any evidence to the contrary has a natural conclusion to violence. people arent going to peacefully stand around and get rounded up because you were TOLD they deserve it.

i sure would! dont bring me down to your level. im on this board saying many things your biased mind would think impossible. not a trump fan. abortion rights. advocation to clear student debt. some of us a open to both sides of the story. especially if it means unjustly prosecuting people. within the rules of what? certainly not law or objectivity. you pluck out the last statement. because you have nothing to say on the rest? its not a surprise.

meaningless? that footage got the shaman his freedom? i guess the sentencing judge didn't see it as dubious as you. its not suprising that there are people in this country that dismiss evidence that ultimately frees a man as what you just suggested. its really sad. there are alot of people whos political bias is so deep they would rather have people rot in jail and maintain that bias then objectively say...maybe the narrative was wrong. many people were violent. i did not see footage of them on tucker. the man who picked up the trashed statues in the footage, if full footage start to finish was him being let in and peacefully cleaning up but he was charged with 20+ years terrorist action. would you be behind that persecution. why? that is civil war territory friend. prosecuting political enemies and then dismissing evidence because its from someone you don't like. its flat out evil. for a group of people that ultimately came out of covid looking like fools i find it astonishing any of you can act objective or think you are on the right side of history to call any info misinformation and not care if fellow citizens are being unjustly prosecuted as you don't even consider evidence to the contrary. id feel the same for antifa or blm who were being prosecuted unjustly dept on evidence uncovered. but that's just me i guess.

so congress passes a full budget and the borrowing part is what they are "raising" after both sides have already agreed to the number beforehand or can the side holding out reduce the debt side. they certainly make it sound that they are actually doing more then shutting down the government over nothing. i know congress held out because they did not want any money allocated to the wall and ultimately that's what they got. no wall

why does the left want to abolish everything? you abolished having to shower and leave the house a few years. you abolished having to find a bathroom to take a $h/+ in your cities. you abolished anyone slowing you down when you take stuff from all the stores. lets mellow out on the abolishing for a bit. no, i hear what your saying. isnt this litterally the only time where our politicians have to even think about money spent or deficits? i agree its pointless but still nice that they have to pretend they give a F with a tiny bit of urgency on the line. lord knows they want to be dead before any real reprocussions truly hit. not getting mail for a few days and suddenly everyone has a meltdown. i like the shock to the system while they pretend to compromise.

"trying to protect elon" that's it? a fragment of a statement diced off excluding context or subject? what was it? why did he say that?

if the class is drag queen bible reading. is the destruction of a normal education for kids to everyone's satisfaction?

it really is pointless. theres not going to be a great awakening of the woke. dont address it directly and it doesnt exist. force them to look and blame someone/thing else. nigerians are "black". are in a worse position economically comming in the country including language barrier. very successful with same skin tone. how many other identity groups are successful and nonviolent but not "white". alot. problems cannot be addressed when they are given a baked in excuse to exist and ignored.

are you using TOTAL population numbers? im not sure what this is saying motor. its a given white people are going to be more violent...towards everyone including whites when they are a majority. is there a place on the planet this is not true? if we drill in deeper and are looking at men. the most likely cause of violence. we are talking less then 7%. 3.5 less likely becomes quite a bit different. all sorts of interesting ways to manipulate data but goose is right. its all meaningless unless given citation to analyze to see what people are doing with the data.

my question is how/why so many older people are caught up in it all. luckily my gen was at the tail end of smartphone emergence. when staring at a computer screen all day made you a outcast/nerd. now its odd not to. for the gen that know segragation/racism/freedom very well. they certainly don't seem to be aware enough that they are pushing society back into it all under new names. i guess age and wisdom dont nec coincide as much as conformity. those people that should know better are who are letting us down...they are all in charge.

i really think we are living in the matrix. society today is what happens when generations grows up with their face in a screen every minute of the day. a morphed worldview that focused on whatever induces a big reaction/on time/ad revenue. entire worldviews built on extremes. algorythms building everything you can't personally see and humans happy to be isolated with the bots who can create consensus. 10s of millions. how could so many be wrong. censorship so you never even know any other reality. imagine the National Enquirer being the nightly news your whole life and noone ever telling you its nothing but hyporbolic garbage. a huge digital community to back up this normal reality. i think that's why many can't be reasoned with. someone is trying to tell you the sky is red but you have seen the sky 100s of times in your phone. millions of heart emojis confirm it is blue. im not even going to bother to look up and anyone who suggests it should be flagged for misinformation. i think that's the reality of ALOT of people. would you want to listen to this red sky liar? we will see where this goes but its not looking good for western society. thats my random thought.

its 2023 hope is all thats required now.

ouch. i didnt know you read my thoughts so often that you can critique my EVERY post. obviously i have to do better for my fan. ill make alot of typos like you but capitalize. try your best to read my shlog. if you can. You can't answer the question. I can literally name every presidential policy in human history and it will effect people at some point. good or bad. large or small segments. You choose a trade war as your reasoning as worst ever. while it did have a effect, its pretty weak. Obviously tariffs on China boosting the cost for products of their slave labor made your trips to Walmart seethe in rage. Sorry i did not notice a significant price jump. If i did I thought decades of imbalance in US trade policy with China was worth trying to adjust. Seeing as we are massive consumers and China picks and chooses what american products they decide to allow in their country. some of those allowed face big tariffs just to be in that market. Thats before they steal our intellectual property, manufacture under slave wages and sell back to Mr Professor at a discount. Good for Ron but not so much for american manufacturing. any price increase may have led to consumers choosing american made products that are at a competitive price. obviously a horrific mistake to try. Biden saw a similar problem. We made too much domestic oil. We need to stop doing that and immediately shift to a energy we have no infrastructure or rare earth minerals for. We also need to cower in fear and fire people for vaccines that do not work well. For years mind you. Me and my fellow citizens felt that immediately and hard. making new life decisions on food or gas every week is a bit different in my world. there are no alternatives. I am paid a decent wage but i know alot of people this is devastating to. no big deal to a tenured english teacher like yourself. Its a difference of opinion i guess. You see global warming as a worthy cause. I see a opposing a growing nuclear powered adversary trade disadvantage as one. You couldn't buy cheap chinese products..as cheap. everyone on fixed income had to skip meals to get to work. you paid more for chinese products. We all pay more for every product. including chinese. you realize that right? Gas doubling in a weeks time. people losing their jobs in a day. direct negative "reprocushunz" to me, and you. if you look close you might say one is much worse. Bidens campaign promise was to end fossil fuels. executive orders on drilling domestically. Its only partially his fault? selling our reserve off. We were independent. sure. whatever you need to tell yourself with those facts in mind. typos, missing indents on paragraphs aside i hope you can comprehend how stupid this comparison is. you may never live in a country that had the prices with the "worst president" presiding again. Am i still unclear on the difference or should i switch to my 3rd language?