Buffarukus

a wealth of all human knowlege contained in everyones pocket and all that needs to be done to cement a lie is repeat it. maybe next we can go into "hands up don't shoot". "crossing state lines to city he wasn't from to kill black people" ". "pandemic of the unvaxinated". "truckers were racist terrorists". it litterally never ends because its just that easy.

im not sure why they arent at least partnered with community service. clean your community. mentor a kid. soup kitchen help. require them to do SOMETHING and society can actually get a return on its tax money.

you know the funny part. trump has been in the public eye for decades. was even at one time prominent in alot of rap lyrics. met countless people. had tv shows with black people on them and only when he ran for president was it discovered he is a nazi leader and racist nothing on his previous 70 years on this planet? unlike your racial jungle master who is on tape repeatedly putting forth racist policy after policy after policy. but he has said alot of dumb s#!÷. thats for sure. i just find that convient. thats all.

im not getting the point. crazy people said crazy $#/+. is it my turn to go find the insane amount of violence and quotes from blm riots now? would you like to hear about the summer of love of a democrat official that allowed armed takeovers of parts of the city before the same people killed teenagers? the murder of a "trumpers" during that time? if youd like to reply to anything i said im down for discussion. other then that the quote you pulled from a very long reply and article means what exactly?

well i agree. my list is to say there are many things that there should be no compromise to. im on this board completely willing to fight for abortion in a decent humane time frame. so those that want to take that away are the same as those who want it whenever. i AM a liberal. the points i made are based on individual rights logic and respect. you cant go through my original list the left is now endorsing and say otherwise unless your biased for your party. as i stated there is compromise to be had on many issues but none on what i mentioned. when i look at the right extremes i would say deporting every illegal alien regardless of circumstance or how hard working a member of society they have become is extreme...but i dont think most rep want that anyways. so what are we talking about on the right? id say the most extreme is removing contraception. everything else you mentioned isnt in the same stratosphere as the left, federally backed ideology. if you arent going to fight against it then "far righters" are all thats left. then we have factions. that aint good. obv civil war would be bad for everyone involved but if those who are apart of the party do not condemn the extremes then this country has no where else to go but further apart and every 4 years will become these extremes with revenge as its goal for the last 4 with half the country under the "enemies" rule. its a recipe for disaster and the fact you cant simply agree on what i mentioned and instead point at the other side as a natural reaction is the problem.

well i will say you put effort out to reply. i will do the same. i grew up in a time the right was the ones censoring based on relgion. i fought against that and would to this day. when you talk about being a christian theocracy. sorry but that was the major religion in western society so yes..thats what we were based on. a good point being raised is why this religion is so hated today by leftists. sure there were atrocities, they happen with every entity to gain power. that doesnt mean that churches where communities gather and the overall teachings..most that promote citizens being kind and generous to each other is the evil entity so many would like to portray or at all comp to the points i raised. your being hyperbolic as with much of this response. i dont see that. i dont see a wide call for fully auto military weaponry. there are major checkpoints in place the left wants to keep increasing until guns are unattainable to average people. they cant clean up areas under their complete control. blame Rs somehow. they have laxed illegal gun possession. they blame legal gun owners for every evil and yes they want to take pretty much all guns. how again has the right not routinley compromised yet the left demands more? how is it this isnt against the very fundamental of the founding of this nation. more hyporbolics. you may not care but that doesn't mean its not being implemented. that was a example. sorry I'm a true liberal on this issue holding MLKs teachings in high regard. the right isnt saying whites are "not white" if they are liberal but you will hear the worst words if a minority is conservative. this subject is non negotiable to me. treat everyone as equal individuals and not groups. in your head you here a different racist message but where is the implementation? sigh. so stopping any age inappropriate content from schools is evil? hitler must be at the head of the FCC. banning movies books and words off of our media for decades! if you want to see banning take a look at amazon and others that happily stop the sales of books to everyone..not just children. its referencing covid lies. its referencing federal prisons puting men into the womens population based on only their words. rapists...women prisoners becoming pregnant. i could go on but you need to do a bit of research if that accusation is foriegn to you. well that's great to hear. this is the closest i think to a admitting the left is wrong and should be fought against. the thing is it doesnt change the outcome of victims that have already been affected or their grieving families. i can go into great detail but here is one example in my city. https://www.blackenterprise.com/mother-of-three-fatally-shot-in-front-of-kids-after-posting-domestic-violence-video/ crime may be up but for a side that wanted to completely abolish police lessen or eliminate punishments not long ago. eventually changing your mind does not help those who suffered from the crime that was completely preventable if not for leftist demands. you should probably hurry up in reversing coarse. im showing you examples of ideology and its results that are having destructive effects on our country. so how long do citizens sit and see the distruction and say they no longer want to be part of it or fight against it? as much as you want to think its small segments of your party. alot is being implemented or echoed federally to these people. in response you have explained anecdotes and hyperbole. ban books when everyone knows the left is the driving force of cancel culture. people want rocket launchers and chain fed guns? come on? one pizza shop guy who believed the powerful were running a pedo ring...before epstein was arrested 🤔. libs of tictok? is that your example? reposting peoples videos to the public...that they made public. these are the examples you give to the death, destruction and division ones i gave? the issue is not the fringe on both sides. its the fact those who are not them but still in their faction refusal to fight against them on fear of them being labled as "the other" so it spirals deeper. also it is about thinking the other side is the worst of human kind. you contribute to this in your PS. "literal nazis"? the press made trump disavow hmm so i guess we won't look at the "literal communists" that scream burn it all down while throwing molotovs while the media rarely asks about and our democratic leaders refuse to even acknowledge the existence of. but this has nothing to do with civil war.

i edited. these are/were liberal beliefs. id love for you to name conservative beliefs. id prob agree with you on some but would much rather you address my points as to why any of them are not in stark contrast to what the fundamental american system should stand for and fight AGAINST without moving of topic or whatabouting. if you can't even explain why they are being pushed/ agreed with then why shouldn't it be fought however necessary. as i said these are fundamental principals under attack.

how? one side thinks the fundamental principals on which the country was founded are a good basis for living and the other sees them as wrong and must be changed from the very roots. how in the hell is that sustainable and what would make ANYONE think changing them is going to bring about more individual prosperity and freedom then the one place on the planet that has the most? the left wants to divide the national anthem! smothered in identity politics that no longer sees people on a individual basis. it doesn't get more divisive then saying some are discluded from a national anthem or different. you claim the right does this yet i never saw evidence. the left thinks parents should not have the ability to discern their own children's education and this administration has targeted as terrorists if they demand it. the left has changed definitions and science to push agendas. not extreme at all. the left has emboldened criminal behavior with woke DAs slapping people on the wrist while seeking harsh criminal sentances to those who have defended their lives and not the aggressors. freedom of speech is being erased by the left and ignored/cheered when tactics are used against anyone with differing opinions. covid was prime example twitter was conclusive in this. one side wants war..one that can go nuclear...the other want peace talks. these arent minor things and no justification should be made for any of the above..yet you will and say this will lead to a "better tomorrow". i see it on this board everyday. they are LIBERAL principals!!!!

so the question for frank is which version of the stories does he read as fair? the originals or the post edited version. its a slick trick by "journalism" today. put out absolute bias opinionated garbage that lack journalistic integrity that most will read and other organizations who wish to echo will quote. that is the one that is important as a story is "breaking" in the news cycle. a endless supply of "those close to the situation" "experts say" " a reliable source" to quote from that live in the writers skull. then later on go back and secretly edit it into a more unbiased story they should have put out to begin with with no edit notes for any who check back to see why they believed garbage when new information later comes out. nothing to see here but a good factual story. not sure where you read anything else 🤔 the first time a news org gets caught doing this type of nonsense. you would think readers and other journalist would denounce them and they would need to apologize and work hard to gain back their credability. no the loyal reader looks the other way and anyone who has had there fill of corporate media lies are labeled conspirators because they have no choice but to find small independent journalists who they trust. unfortunately there are so many options many do fall into flat out grifters whos only requirement is to regurgitate exactly what their curated audience wants to extract from a stories information. unless their is a agreed standard of ethics shared by everyone for the information they consume there is no other outcome then hyper polarization and unfortunately violence between factions that are told "the others" are out to get them.

that argument can be made on every play. you focus in i guarantee jersey tugging. illegal blocks in the back, push offs, all sorts of penalties are made which is why the refs usually establish what and what is not going to be tolerate during the coarse of the game. some teams run clear pick plays early just to see what they can get away with but the players adjust as the game goes on. if jersey tugs on change of direction were of high standard then your saying noone did that all game?? we both know thats not true so the question is why there? 3rd down game literally on the line and a ticky tack penalty that i don't believe changed the outcome. mahomes overthrew it whether that happened or not. you don't call that. it wasn't agregious, it wasn't outcome driven and it wasn't called all game..but it decides the game. games can easily be won and lost with this standard of...well it was a penalty and they decided to start calling it in the most meaningful situations suddenly. good call.

you guys are changing the definition of bravery now too? your bravery to hide for years has made the inflation of new dictionaries unattainable. please slow down. if it weren't for people going out and facing "certain death" you would still be bravely spraying lysol on your mail and calling the cops on kids who are illegally getting exercise in the park you padlocked. officer!! i know i just called but im now positive they are unmasked!! i see SMILES in my binoculars!! please hurry!! brave... lol 🤣🤣

she would have been a good leader if given a fair shake. great speech that i dont think anyone can argue with who isnt completely brainwashed. gov collusion with tech and corporate media have been "subverting democracy" for a very long time and alot of idiots in here cheer it on. i suppose its good practice even when deployed against their own candidates.

im not privy to what rumors people think stuck to who at what time. all i know is it was a right wing nutjob. then it is revealed its a blm supporter who has rainbow flags. then its a canadian immigrant who illegally crossed the boarder to ummm turn back into a right wing trumper who wanted to save a country he didnt legally live in. alot of cameras on a very wealthy mans property and yet alot of censorship on reporters for easily proven facts that seem to take their time to come out for some reason. whatever.

how long till we find out it was built with US tax dollars in a "joint scientific venture". with our chinese allies we will identify this countries domestic terrorist and end the tyranny of freedom.

his politics were all over the map. as tends to be the case with insane people. if we want to throw him in that box i guess we can also throw him in the illegal immigrants are violent criminals box too?

its a shame both sides seem to cross their fingers in hopes attacks are politically driven just for a chance to push half the country into a box with a murderous insane person. good thing we can all count the left to stereotype people anyways. when its a republican its the individual. when its anything else, including someone with their ideology in a area they control laws.. its the weopons fault. cheap easy hammers are the problem 🙄 never fails.

i think we are sore from a few trash talkers after the game but at the end of the day i think cincy and their fans showed class for the damar situation and am pretty suprised how hated they are now by this fanbase. they are a small market team that have been the bottom of the barrel for as long as us and came out of the blue to be really good. they are a afc rival so i hope we stomp mudholes in their skulls when we play em. today showed they arent that good and we need to adjust whatever it was that was the garbage we played in our game. but i dont have this extreme hatred i see. tired of the cincy kc hype so ill be flocking or swooping..whatever phillies fan base does for the sb for a game lol. but cincy got hosed by the refs imo. kc aint that good either. good news for us.

not really. the hard truth is josh beat mahomes. frazier beat josh.

maybe. but its pretty well known you dont throw a game changing/winning flag in a situation like that unless its agregious. that wasnt at all. a ton of flags on cincy in critical situations that just so happen to keep kc alive at the end. if it was 3rd down then expect the refs to get involved. it was suspect as hell. i could care less who won and want them both to lose in the sb but i thought the refs were dragging kc over the finish line all forth quarter. im a eagles fan for a game i guess.

of coarse they do. when black people who disagree with them are labeled white supremist you know their logic is unhinged nonsense. here is a long list they have advocated with thier votes and could never back with sound logic. so they run from...for starts. follow the science! as it was completely ignored to the point it ruined the US economy and is crushing the people at the bottom that they pretend to "fight" for. the response? not us! demanding lockdowns/ mass firing/ censorship while punishing any who oppose us... it was the viruses fault. who could have seen this outcome? hmmm who could have possibly seen this coming you say? well let me see here. maaaybee any scientist banned off twitter or a large group of people you labled selfish murders for starts. black lives matter! i have yet to see a single protest in front of the number 1 taker of innocent black lives. drug dealing gang spots. i live in buffalo and waiting to see a single blm youth center/ school guidance program/ family council initiative with the millions they took from idiots. where is ANY positive change from the burning murder and destruction that was caused by the murder of george floyd? yet they are the ones screaming they want justice. its a private company! build your own! as every twitter file was brought up a long time ago by reasonable people who aren't even republicans, just believe in free speach. as big tech in unison destroyed their competitor parlor. of coarse with gov assistance lies. now lifting the rock of twitter exposes the filth that was really going on and nothing but crickets from the left side of the room. the right : fbi #1 most dangerous domestic terrorists! as antifa to this day are executing police officers for trying to erect somthing that they burnt cities down for. TRAINING FOR OFFICERS. or when they give cover to a insane person who plots to kill supreme court judge.. with the white house blessing to continue. fascists!! as they advocate state workers to have more and more power over children then their own parents when it comes to teaching subjects and values as they know better how to raise your children then you. your also on the terrorist list if you disagree. they scream about voter suppression and they cant even hold their own primaries without absolute corruption destroying them. muliple times! ask tulsi gabbert or bernie sanders. help of their friends in the corporate media and of coarse big tech to stop tulsi from getting momentum. google had a "glitch" that halted searches to her page after her dismantling of Kamala on the debate stage. she stop evidence to free innocent men in CA. but first black vp...so brave. but dont worry when they face republicans its different. the mostest securist in forever! soft on crime DAs/ governors making criminals out to be the victims after brutal crimes or giving them 2nd chances to finish their objectives leaving behind grieving families in their "reforms" we stand for womens rights when we cant even figure out what that means at the highest positions in government. as long as it makes them feel warm a fuzzy in a virtue signal who cares if judges who will have to determine paternity, parental and divorce proceedings cant figure out who is who if they simply state they have changed genders ect ect ect. that wont have issues that ruin lives. ny california the highest rate of citizens fleeing today. florida the highest rate of citizens arriving. on and on. ask leftists about any of these and you get the arbitrary "well i dont agree with that" or that or that or " im a individual! " but you vote democrat? ummmm "trump is a russian!!" or they disapear from the discussion. ill let this post bump the thread. so they can ignore it a bit more.

for a country so concerned with attack on democracy these files/ threads sure are quiet. first amendment. gov corruption collusion. political parties silencing opposition. unfortunately none of this is shocking to those of us who used common sense. as for the rest it was a "conspiracy" by tin foil wearing crackpots that quickly turned into "no big deal" quickly. these drops are the most important thing we have proof of and all it needs to continue is for people to ignore it. that they are doing quite well and wonder why they can always count on the gov to lie and hold them down while they b/÷ch about how things will never change for the better. pretty sad.

your making your point clear. the gov should not be saying anything to twitter to influence them. the mere "suggestion" by a outside party that has ultimate power over them is the problem. im not sure why you see this as so innocent when A) the gov did not simply point out tos violations. they went far beyond that. Twitter has a staff specifically to moderate. so the gov is actually suggesting they focus directly on what they want them to OR fudge their tos to do their bidding. this was made perfectly clear and a big reason tech keeps their tos vague so they can do what they want on their or "outside" influencers whims. B) the intermingling of gov with former fbi ect. could also be construed as the opposite. inside people in high positions of private companies MORE willing to push propaganda on behalf of their colleagues. maybe that was their only intent. viewing it how you are is very nieve in my opinion. so phizer gives million of ad revenue to facebook. they have a hotline to the top person as twitter relies on such a "generous" supporter. phizer says hey buddy. that competitor of ours..did you know there is a side effect that could hurt people. thats dangerous and against tos...right? how bout you remove them or maybe we stop. working with a company that is not interested in protecting people from side effects. talk to jim. our former employee who came over from us and he can explain it all. just innocent convo. twitter can say no. please. regardless the gov was PAYING twitter. so its not even what you say. if the gov wants to make a statement or promote facts it thinks are being spread online. its called a microphone or press briefing ect. not coordinating with social media platforms to artificially control its output. you can't suggest people are conspiratorial while also being fine with influence on info in the same breath. like i said people will fill in the blanks and recently they have been correct. hell, gov involvement in suppressing free speech was a conspiracy just a moment ago.

good methods here. i certainly try but its still very hard. in alot of ways i think we are doomed on this front. there are many stories out where clear proof is out and yet still people believe lies. rep still think elections were stolen. ny gov wont hire back medical workers without vax even though it does nothing in the regards they are convinced, stopping the transmission to patients. so i guess people just do what they want in large part regardless of info. somehow a general narrative now overshadows any real facts. in this regard i find the left far more irrational and dangerous. as i stated i can name alot of examples where innocent people were hurt/killed on behalf of a false narritive. maybe thats my bias speaking but large portions of the country burning and under authoritarian lockdown destroying the economy say otherwise.

you talk about this very reasonably but in the twitter file thread also seem to state gov involvement in the decemination of information is a good thing. so dep on who is in power and their intent something like trumps collusion with russia can be amplified or suppressed under the guise of "public saftey" ect ect. so its contradictory to want facts presented as they stand on their merit and to also hand wave gov or any other entity with power to promote or destroy a company to have any outside influence of information. this goes for corporations giving ad money ect ect. if there is influence on info. all of it should be called out and fought against.

you say let facts drive those conclusions but the REAL problem with this country are "facts" no longer exist from a non partisan consistent source. are doctors giving facts? cdc? i see alot of "those close to the situation" "experts say". many ways to make audience believe utter garbage with zero REAL sources or proof. which news organizations do you think are always giving you unbiased straight forward facts? there is no clear answer to me so if you have one id love to hear. i think people such as yourself may also consider a conglomerate as the truth. if many are saying the same thing it must be the truth. the minority are the quacks but covid shows clearly, if anything could be pulled from the mess that this isnt nec true either. all ill say is that info on this story was suspiciously vague. reporters reprimanded for simply saying what happened on the info he gave? stories deleted? one could easily see that as a cover up. im glad you found a reputable source that laid out all the info you needed. i would like to check this source to see what their "facts" were on other subjects that have NOW morphed into a completely different set. please share. maybe we all can get on the same page by these trusted sources you use that always gives proof and facts so immediatly. its what journalism was supposed to be so I'm genuinely interested.