Buffarukus

i agree. that is a major part. if our dts diminate then the smaller faster lbs is actually a good scheme. unfortunately after this year we have noone under contract. is oliver worth a huge contract? daquan still want to stay? phillips stay healthy a season. last year of the big boys and next is when the rookie lbs will have to step up. not a good combo for the future right now.

good insight i really didnt think dodson was in any contention because they choose klien in edmonds absence. or was dodson on suspension during that time? he def has somthing the front office likes but i agree with the Spector analysis. it always seems strange to me when guys seem like great players in preseason then fall off the map. the argument is "well they are playing guys that will be flipping burgers". no. they are playing against the the competition they are given and excelling. they cant demand to be first string so this is all that can be assessed. the coaches obviously see more in practice but how can anything definitive be said about how they do against better players if not given the legitamate opportunity. i really like Spector and hope i can see what he's got against starting caliber players.

when you only keep 2 on the field all the time and they are the top tacklers of the team every year you better make sure you value the position properly. shawn had a decent one in carolina that had a big part in getting him to a sb and landing him a head coaching job. hopefully he knows they are at least average rated. 😁

id say in Edmunds defense alot of what he gave noone could notice because it never happened. his monster size and speed meant if he was anywhere close to a reciever the qb was hesitant to take a chance on that target, triple pat the ball and possably why a lineman got the sack dump pass. his height and wingspan also meant he could cover guys behind him if the qb didnt put touch on passes. i agree with everything you said when it comes to his trench play/ physicality but i also give the guy credit for the problems he created to offensive coordinators. gameplaning any intermediate routes in the middle were a problem. if the league recognized only impact plays and stats there would be no reason he was highly sought after and given a rediculous contract he got. our D saw a sharp dropoff when he was out. i hope McDermott has a better plan then putting in the guys we already had during that time. scheme change? a gem in FA after cuts? somthing more then undersized rookie lb commanding the D.

this could be what they are thinking. i say Edmunds worse trait was going down hill so maybe we are not going to see a huge drop off besides the numerous tipped passes he had. he wasnt very good at blitzing either. covering alot of grass in zone and his sideline to sideline speed, along with size was what we got. both our rookie lbs can play that role but like noteed. the AFC has a really good run attack and running up the gut, getting a lineman to the second level will be a good SAFE recipe to move the chains if we are rolling with these guys as starters.

i said this as well. our team is in a division with pretty good run attacks and these small fast lbs dont seem like good stick your face in the line stack and shed players. maybe its to dare them to keep the ball out of rogers, hill hands. the jets played us close with their #1 rb injured. NE has always had a good running attack and won a game strictly running. miami played us close every game and had career days against our D and we seem to be all about pass support with smaller fast guys. i think the gameplan in the AFC will be run the ball down the bills throats to eat up clock and hope josh reverts to his old gunslinger all or nothing old self that can force mistakes and turnovers. klein is better run stuffer so we will see but the future looks to be pass specific D. especially if we are sticking to our nickle base roots. hopefully our new TE and line negate josh's reliance to put it all on his shoulders

i have a feeling this is deeper then the puddles you constantly leave that smell like. anyways, its what happens when you post so much garbage and absolutely refuse to acknowledge when you are wrong. is this just another quick take or propaganda that will change in 5 min? who knows! why would this be different? obviously we have a constitution and first ammendment that everyone including the gov is supposed to uphold. does turkey and india share this? is there anything in the turkey user agreement that states what happened is against there countries very foundation? you do know everywhere is not here, right? if twitters user agreement in the US transparently mentioned shadow bans and gov censorship without cause or notice and the multitude of other issues. guess what? nobody could say much. all that private company make your own for decades by the liberals is actually a sound statement. i def will read into this more and oppose it and elon if true because i do not flip my beliefs based on political factors. they just are what they are. finally. you sure seem to have alot of resentment for something you absolutely rely on in every single post you cut and paste. you obviously are fine with any story in this thread and are a big finacial supporter of Elon and his platform with your very existence here. pretty typical leftist behavior to condemn something that you also support. did you also buy the checkmark from the guy you hate? lifetime subscription? lol.

serious question that may be a dilemma. many men accidentally get women pregnant. can a man assault a woman to cause a miscarriage and get no charges related to the outcome of the child? so only assault charges can be made because he did not kill anything that is considered alive. does this put many women in jeopardy because there are alot of POS out there that look at assault time will be less then 18+ years of responsibility? i ask this because i think the extremes used to take control of the conversation only but have been more routinely making laws. that and rarely is the left forced to view their ideas through a different lens. the exact way liberals feel about womens lives at this time is the way pro lifers feel about unborn children for decades. i think the left went from safe and rare into another realm that is dark and now the right is doing the same. the sad part is i think both have valid points and are done from a standpoint of empathy..for the most part but they only consider evil intentions. regardless how you feel your ethics will be challenged and it WILL become hypocritical at some point unless clear lines are drawn. nobody seems to want to do that. you say surely the right wants to prosecute women for murder. thats the logical conclusion. those same people have sat there and watched fully formed unequivocal human life be debated for termination simply because it did not leave the mother. until day of birth abortion is the logical conclusion to refusing life exists inside the womb. things are going to go to their conclusions in a polar way unless people call out their own side and stop only vilifying the other.

yeah i think. i was working. i think they threw it 2 times that game but brings up the point we need a D that can stuff the run because sometimes that's all either team can do in OUR weather. bengals had a good rushing attack in the playoff game we just lost as well. maybe we are sitting this rook with AJ but beyond this year alot of small speed lbs we are stacking for the future.

ne beat us with nothing but running attack. hall seems to be a stud that we didnt face due to injury and miami rb had his best game against us last year. speed is great but i hope the guy can stack and shed as well or josh and the new new tight end we just got arent going to see the field much. opponents are going to grind out the clock and see if josh can play a mistake free game.

lol. yeah im drinking a couple cases of bud light. i think they are putting liquor in them and calling them beer. jesus relax. im just killing time during the draft and i guess i am also watching you spaz for a joke that @ you. didnt know members were inflicting so much trauma putting your name in posts. 😳

you can @ me dude. i wont get all menstrual like @ChiGoose your up to 3 solicitors chi and growing. you should start a subscription service and profit off your board celebrity status. bags mugs. of coarse as soon as you make a good profit we take it back and redistribute it amongst all our members. just the way you communists would want. 😁

that is absurdity! everyone knows that play only works if the player spins clockwise. cook is right handed! now we need to use capital to move up to get the personel to run it which will def cost our next 5 picks. you just destroyed the team for the next decade.

do to the shakey foundation built by companies who got exclusive gov contracts.

really? bernard was a absolute shock to me. i thought he would devolop into a hybrid cb/lb for nickle pass downs as a third taking out maybe poyer as dumb as that sounds as i write it. a disrupter, not a lynchpin. maybe a Kelsey killer to man up with more size. never saw him as a full time starter. hey if he develops into more then a wrench to toss into packages thats great but for some reason he seems like a absolute liability in any run and def not a full time lb in our nickle only. i cant believe we didnt reach to get the best one in the draft in the first. not that i want that at all but seeing as mcd had luke to cement his career and they seemed so intrigued with Edmunds becoming that guy with ridiculous traits. i will be suprised if they let mlb in a primary nickle not be a stud out the gate. meaning rd 2 maybe another trade up just to do it. again, not that i advocate that. we still need competition upgrades for the o line. esp right tackle.

ok i think thats why im hesitant. we seemed locked into 11 and never seemed to get creative and by the halfway point we stalled out and had to bring back beasley just because dorsey needed a specific slot guy and could not get creative with pretty talented roster. im still down on dorsey. we seemed really excited for gilliams athleticism. not on the field much. both our our rb pass catch ability. rare. knox upside enough to give a nice contract. spotty production. invisible in games. im a huge fan of shakir and dorsey issues getting him involved. dorsey seemed to just go 4 guys in very specific roles, besides digs in slot because hes a athletic freak. so the rich getting richer when you cant use what you got has me skeptical. that and this teams absolute refusal to play rookies in the first place. now we get one in a position we are not weak. it really makes me nervous. i hope it works out the way you say instead of how it has actually been but thanks for the insight. i really think we should trade knox as much as that pains me. i just dont think his production will be worth the hefty contract now. hope im wrong but thanks for the info and optimism. i need it lol

wow good job. im warming up to it after watching film. this is def BPA. does this put knox on the bench more or is kincaid our #3 full time slot? im not mad at the pick if i had more confidence in dorsey. im not a fan of how he uses weopons and kincaid/knox combo i feel one is going to end up contributing nothing. if its knox that's alot of cap in the trash. dorsey just seems like he needs a vanilla offense with really good players at concrete positions. not alot of interesting shifts of roles happening in which i think both guys can eat.

i like this very much.

no. we look at evidence. tucker presented some. some that was hidden from you, me, and defense team...which is illegal. you refuse to ask simple questions based on it. you then go on to say it was bs or whatever when it lead to his freedom and dont blink a eye. if trump was in office. they arrested a redtail hawk for violence. cnn showed clips of you standing around. i said cnn is propaganda. i dont believe my lying eyes. let him rot. pretty sure you would feel diff for my unrelenting bias that doesn't even consider anything but my politics for conviction of the strongest degree. thats a disturbing place but i see by your downvote of that idea. your pretty far gone. have a good night and hope that situation is just a example.

im not. im saying being si biased you are perfectly fine prosecuting your "enemies" and dismissing any evidence to the contrary has a natural conclusion to violence. people arent going to peacefully stand around and get rounded up because you were TOLD they deserve it.

i sure would! dont bring me down to your level. im on this board saying many things your biased mind would think impossible. not a trump fan. abortion rights. advocation to clear student debt. some of us a open to both sides of the story. especially if it means unjustly prosecuting people. within the rules of what? certainly not law or objectivity. you pluck out the last statement. because you have nothing to say on the rest? its not a surprise.

meaningless? that footage got the shaman his freedom? i guess the sentencing judge didn't see it as dubious as you. its not suprising that there are people in this country that dismiss evidence that ultimately frees a man as what you just suggested. its really sad. there are alot of people whos political bias is so deep they would rather have people rot in jail and maintain that bias then objectively say...maybe the narrative was wrong. many people were violent. i did not see footage of them on tucker. the man who picked up the trashed statues in the footage, if full footage start to finish was him being let in and peacefully cleaning up but he was charged with 20+ years terrorist action. would you be behind that persecution. why? that is civil war territory friend. prosecuting political enemies and then dismissing evidence because its from someone you don't like. its flat out evil. for a group of people that ultimately came out of covid looking like fools i find it astonishing any of you can act objective or think you are on the right side of history to call any info misinformation and not care if fellow citizens are being unjustly prosecuted as you don't even consider evidence to the contrary. id feel the same for antifa or blm who were being prosecuted unjustly dept on evidence uncovered. but that's just me i guess.

so congress passes a full budget and the borrowing part is what they are "raising" after both sides have already agreed to the number beforehand or can the side holding out reduce the debt side. they certainly make it sound that they are actually doing more then shutting down the government over nothing. i know congress held out because they did not want any money allocated to the wall and ultimately that's what they got. no wall

why does the left want to abolish everything? you abolished having to shower and leave the house a few years. you abolished having to find a bathroom to take a $h/+ in your cities. you abolished anyone slowing you down when you take stuff from all the stores. lets mellow out on the abolishing for a bit. no, i hear what your saying. isnt this litterally the only time where our politicians have to even think about money spent or deficits? i agree its pointless but still nice that they have to pretend they give a F with a tiny bit of urgency on the line. lord knows they want to be dead before any real reprocussions truly hit. not getting mail for a few days and suddenly everyone has a meltdown. i like the shock to the system while they pretend to compromise.

"trying to protect elon" that's it? a fragment of a statement diced off excluding context or subject? what was it? why did he say that?