transplantbillsfan

Holy friggin balls!!!! twoandfourteen is totally Crusher!!! Mind officially blown! Lesson learned in this thread is that you can't fix stupid, even with a new username. a Crusher by any other name, like twoandfourteen, is still the stupidly stubborn Crusher just like a Ryan L Bills/ Maury Baulstein/ AiritoutFitzy by any other name, like Teddy KGB, is still the childishly simple RLBills/ MB/ AioFitzy thinking he "pantsed" everyone in an argument. Too funny, and a little sad.

Except Taylor is 12th out of 37 QBs in the NFL as a QB on 3rd down in passing. http://stats.washingtonpost.com/fb/leaders.asp?range=NFL&rank=098&type=Passing&year=2017

Taylor was great in the red zone last year... soooooo willing to admit you might be wrong yet?

Like I've said, you just don't get it. I've been patient with you and tried explaining this in many different ways, but you've been lost to the ways of the Dark side. I'm not going to argue this point anymore with you. Your disdain for Taylor and your overt extremism regarding him has accelerated in the last couple months and there's just absolutely no hope for bringing you to reality.

Don't forget about AiritoutFitzy. There's something wrong with a dude on the Internet who constantly feels the need to change his identity

No, he hasn't.

This isn't the same thing as QBs being better comparatively, you realize that, right? For example, some GMs, like Jerry Jones are a little nuts and uber loyal. He'd never trade Dak for Tyrod even though Tyrod is better than Dak right now. The same largely goes for Mariota. Trubisky was a rookie so same rule applies even though Taylor's obviously better now. Tyrod is better than Winston right now but Winston is going to get a ton of time because of sheer physical talent and potential. So just because a GM might take Dak and/or Mariota and/or Trubisky and/or Winston before Tyrod doesn't mean they're better. So then you're left with QBs Taylor is obviously better than like whoever is the QB for the Jets, Cardinals, Dolphins, Browns, Broncos. Are we applying backups starting for the injured guys in front of them into this equation? Taylor's better than Brissett and Hundley but not Luck or obviously Rodgers. Taylor's better than Foles but not Wentz. Then you get a handful of QBs who you could argue Taylor is better than right now: Flacco, Carr, Dalton, Manning, Bortles. So your question of "who a GM would choose" isn't the same as "who's the better QB in a vacuum." And we haven't even brought coaching or offensive system or offensive talent into the equation here. So, again, saying Taylor is the 30-35th best QB is ridiculous.

You are seriously unbelievably stubborn. So stubborn that it absolutely blinds you. Is it really not become completely obvious to you yet that this whole going into a shell and becoming conservative thing is really largely a product of McDermott's game planning, which frankly I'm really not going to criticize because he managed to get us into the playoffs. But it looks pretty clear that and "McDermott world" it would be ideal to get a lead quickly and then allow the defense to hold that lead while playing Uber conservative on offense, being sure never to turn the ball over. Unbelievable that you aren't even giving credit to Taylor for winning a game. On the bills first two drives Taylor was 8/11 for 111 yards passing, 1 TD, 2/3 on 3rd downs and the team jumped out to a 10-0 lead midway into the 2nd quarter. But yeah... let's not give Taylor any credit

But he's apparently very happy.

I'm super stoked!!! Why aren't you?

Happy New Years!!! I still have 4 1/2 hours of 2017, though.

Is that a prediction? Are you trying to win the Internet at the expense of your team?

Yeah, saying Taylor's the 30-35th best QB in the NFL was stupid then and is stupider now

You still really aren't figuring all this out yet, are you? You and xRushx and TeddyKGB and jmc and Crusher (wherever he may be) and your ilk can go celebrate New Years Eve in a hotel room sulking and burning Tyrod Taylor's jersey knowing he'll be etched forever in Buffalo lore and that his name just won't go away like you so desperately want it to. Tyrod Taylor is the first QB to lead the Bills to the playoffs since 1999. And he is a big reason for this playoff berth. It happened. Get over it.

Dude go away or give him credit for once! This team was a crap show from the beginning of the year that most picked to win less than 6 games. Unbelievably we've downgraded our WR corps from 2016 and our OL has been a revolving door both literally and in terms of rotation. Taylor is better than you thought he was and, truthfully, you're in denial if you think there isn't a really good chance he'll be back in 2018 as a bridge to whoever we draft.

Mainly people are just stupid and stubborn and would rather be right and miserable while saying "I told you so!" than be wrong and happy and say "I was wrong." It's one of those "win the Internet" things, for some. Most rational people are probably finally accepting that, in fact, this is not an either/or thing with Taylor... we can keep him for the one year he he has left on his contract while also drafting our future Franchise QB.

Yes, he is. We will look to upgrade on him, which is fine and what we should do. But Taylor might be around another year as we make a (possibly even more...?) legitimate run at a ring All the posters who said we'd never make the playoffs with Tyrod as our QB (you know who you are... there are a good handful of you ) should just come here and eat crow! After all, we're all super stoked we're in the playoffs!

Oh hohohoho BABY!!! WOHOO!!!! Playoffs babyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!

I really hope the FO doesn't do something stupid like cutting Shady this offseason. He's such a special player

Some of you, I think, or putting too much into this meant touring thing with veteran QBs versus Rockies. If we get Donald and he's on the bench he will learn from the coaches and in the film room. One thing he can observe from Tyrod and take from him is his Monday to Saturday preparation. Favre didn't "mentor" Rodgers. They didn't even like each other by most reports. If Darnold is the kid he's reported to be, he's going to learn what to do and what not to do while sitting and observing. And if we get him and we just decide to start in from game one and take our lumps, I'm fine with that, too. Regardless of all this, I know VERY little about college football, but the little I know the only 3 QBs I want at this moment are Mayfield, Darnold, Rudolph... in that order. And I'll repeat, I'm largely unaware of college football.

Again... so our hope could then be he comes out, falls, maybe we still trade up but not as far as top 5, and maybe we let him sit on the bench for just a little while while he who shall not be named (by some ) starts for a bit while he grows a little. Yeah, maybe he's still a bit raw. But a lot of what I've read and heard say he has the potential to be a generational QB.

Sweet!!! Maybe he falls to us! amiright?!

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TaylTy00.htm https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/M/McCoJo01.htm

Seriously? An apples to apples comparison with a guy who started just over half the games that Taylor has started in the last three years? First of all, both of these guys have about 237-238 yards per game total they're putting up. But yards are NOT the most important STAT!!! 3 years for McCown, 41 TDs, 33 turnovers. 3 years for Taylor, 64 TDs, 21 turnovers. 'nuff said buuuuut... there is also the fact that in significantly fewer games than Taylor over the last 3 years, McCown has lost 527 yards on sacks to Taylor's 653 yards. annnnnnd... in the last 3 years Taylor has more 4th quarter comebacks and game winning drives than McCown. alsoooooo... since I know of a poster or two who view ANY/A as the most important stat, Taylor has a higher average there than McCown over the last 3 years, too. McCown is not better than Taylor

Trade would be nice. I'm more skeptical we just release him. Didn't Rappaport say exactly this exactly a year ago?