Foxx

serious question. did say he 'could' or that he 'did'? big difference.

most alchemists i know try to turn pee into gold.

you could also constantly touch your face.

you don't have too.

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1235421457296977922

https://twitter.com/badluck_jones/status/1234756378041946113

https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1235547706979946501

because, you know... accused is the same as being guilty. in that vein, an accused law breaker should not be a law maker.

can an ex-president who is no longer in office still claim executive privilege?

i may be mistaken, but didn't Sotomayor start the whole thing with her publicly stated partisan opinions?

Trumps rants may be incoherent to you but they are just the way he talks. the cognitive connections are there and in no way could even be remotely considered to be on the same level as Biden's disconnections. Joe can't even complete a sentence half the time, barely knows where he is, can't finish a line from the declaration of independence, that one would think a 40 year vet of the establishment would be able to recite in his sleep. the 25th amendment in relation to Trump was because of the deep state attempt (which is still ongoing) to get him out of office. there is no way it ever would have stood up to scrutiny and that is why it was never truly attempted. one is not like the other. a billionaire businessman is not necessarily in the same fold as corrupt politicians who depend upon the graft of their constituents for their existence and relevance. does not his nationalistic policies explain this difference to you?

if, by some miracle, Joe gets elected, i predict he won't be Prez for longer than a year. he will either step down and relinquish his position to the VP (he is even on tape stating such) or they will invoke the 25 amendment. he is only being run to preserve the globalists agenda so that Trump doesn't totally obliterate it. as far as evidence that voters won't cross their ideology to vote for the other candidate, i'm not going to go out and find all the references. there are many clips of pundits on your networks who have been arguing this point. we will just have to argue this point, watch for more evidence to come to light and wait and see what really happens.

nut shell time again. https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1235244250025119748

i think anyone of those teams, outside of maybe the Colts, would give up a 1st for JG.

LBSBLBGB gave a good response to your post, below. i don't know that the narrative here has been that the Dem party has shifted so far left that it will inevitably elect Sanders. i think it more a case of a perception that any sane individual understands that sane people would not elect an individual that clearly has the cognitive issues that ol' Joe has. as such, yes the presumption may be more slanted towards the understanding that Sanders would then be the logical nominee. i also think that the Democrat Party is clearly split. again, see LBSBLBGB's post below that you dismissed out of hand without taking into account the broader implications in play here. to pick up on the broader implications at play here, since you simply want to dismiss Super Tuesday's results out of hand because it goes against your perceived biases with regard to the DParty being splintered, lets take a look at the overall delegate count. NYT Article the delegate count at this moment is 45% Biden and 39% Sanders. if we add Bloomberg's total to Biden and Warren's to Sanders (because of the ideologies), the total then becomes 52% Biden and 46% Sanders. i may be off here but to me, it appears that that is very symptomatic of split ideologies. to your last question, i don't think it matters what the reason Dem voters come out in November is. you are not going to have enough to oust Trump, you just aren't. historical norms even say that with conditions on the ground, you won't be able to do it. as the saying goes... it's the economy, stupid. add in the fact that you have factions within your party that have clearly stated that they will not vote for the other candidate, no matter what and you now have a serious problem in addition to the other factors against you. a party splintered is going to have an extremely hard time winning anything. if evidence emerges that shows the DNC/Establishment has again stolen the nomination from Bern, the Bros are not going to be as accepting as they were in '16. youse guys are in trouble no matter which angle you look at it from.

Bern winning in a third party run? he * might win the state of NH. nationally, no way. pardon me but it is debatable whether or not a Dem can win this election, with all their voters. spin off half them and you are guaranteed to fail.

https://twitter.com/TheFigensezgin/status/1235203553968435200

take a look at your response and the question asked. does it in any way seem out of context?

the caricature is no longer is able to think rationally. if he perceives an opening to attack DR, that is all that matters.

i saw where the latest gimmick is to sneak elements of their precious, 'medicare for all' into the bill.

is she dropping? https://twitter.com/mj_lee/status/1235226927184699392

good. https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1235183097269886978