Figster

If by exposed you mean punched in the face I could understand why you might feel differently. Dumping cold and still very drinkable brewski on him probably didn't help the situation none.

BRUTAL how? As good as A Rodgers is the Pack always seems to be flying under the radar and its partly because of how humble the organization/fan base is IMO.

I like these choices

nice post my friend

Well If we're going to wish upon a falling star lets go undefeated and Championship. until we can beat the Patriots its probably all for not...

With the exception of Cowgirlsfan.

McD gives me the impression the guy really gets it.

Deep down I think even some of Taylors biggest detractors want him to succeed in my humble opinion Guns. Thanks for sharing the awesome story OP

TnT DYNAMITE!!!

Taylor was able to hold the team right at or just a little above the 500 mark without much help from the D so its hard for me to see the Bills losing ground in that regard despite the tough schedule and new HC/coaching staff in my humble opinion Shaw. I agree with your comment on not much separation between 10 - 6 and 6 - 10 teams. Myself personally, I"m predicting a 9 - 7, 10 - 6 season with Sammy , Shady and T Mobile leading the charge/ wildcard

I agree, Everything takes practice and actual play time to perfect and more reps in the passing game is needed to gel properly. Becoming a better passing team allows Buffalo the ability to attack more weak points of the opposition both run and pass. Flexability will also help manage the clock more effectively at crunch time. More balanced O keeps all the playmakers involved and stretches the opposition thin.

Running the football chews up the clock and when a teams trailing in the 2nd half throwing the football helps conserve time and move the football down the field more rapidly to score IMO.

I agree with you #34

Upgrading the TE position wouldn't hurt my feelings, Welcome aboard OP

I'll compare your terrible burgers to Buffalo's D, and Rex Ryan burnt the hell out of good ground beef...

My thoughts also and I didn't mean to single you out. Sorry OP for getting off topic...

TBD/mods try to allow posters a chance to iron out personal differences on their own and as adults its something all of us should be capable of doing. I can tell you from personal experience when the differences start interfering with how well the forum operates, turning threads into back and forth arguments somebody will get sent packing. been there and done that...

Cam Newton has scored 48 TD's running the football.

Taylor is going into his 3rd season when on average the game begins to slow down. Combine that with better coaching, system and supporting cast along with more reps in the passing game and we may be pleasantly surprised by the outcome in my humble opinion Ktulu.

two big, dirty...

If your dead last in attempts being dead last in completions is to be expected along with any other passing totals IMO.

Better D stops the opponent more and gets more turnovers, which in turn gives our O the ball more with better field position. Do you see how that translates to more yardage points and wins?

again, this is very good point John is making for everyone. Don't turn a good post into a bad one with insults. Crusher also gets allot of insults so lets not pretend it doesn't go both ways.

Being equally as good in the run and pass allows an OC to gameplan what works best aginst every opponent in my humble opinion. It also allows for more adjustment in bad weather conditions. Do you run the ball less against an opponent that struggles stopping the run? no, of course you don't I agree, middle of the pack in total yardage doesn't get the job done. I do however feel the Bills D contributed...

Where do you think less pass attempts went? I suppose you could say Rex is one big, dirty... With all due respect OP my point is the G Roman low pass attempts was by design and its something our HC wanted out of the O.