Figster

I say the fact people are liking a 5th round draft choice well enough to become concerned with his development speaks volumes my friend.

N P is already running the new O better then T T, TIme to do what?

It has more to do with Taylor not appearing to be in Buffalo's long term future then anything and If thats the case evaluating Peterman serves more of a purpose IMO.

I'm hooked on what works best for the team short and long term. If the shiny new toy theory makes you happy then have at it.

Beane's not the OC watching Peterman get more and more comfortable working with the 1st team O/Jones

lol, ok

Does it do any good for me to back a QB Buffalo doesn't see a future in? So I can just be more disapointed when he's gone? When the writtings on the wall? Seriously...( I know, I know, why so serious)

If flip flopping is what I have to be called to upgrade the QB position, call me the flip flopping figster

I could eat some Crayonz

I understand where your coming from if the kid wasn't making it look like just another day at the office. Peterman's decisive, showing good accuracy,and good command of the huddle. So I don't see game experience as being anything but a benefit for Nathan Peterman in my humble opinion Alpha.

Tyrod Taylor was fairly popular as Buffalo's starter with the Bills fan base IMO. I also think on a whole the fans are a little gun shy of getting to worked up over anyone. So even in a small sample size here on TBD to see Peterman ahead in voting in just a couple of meaningless preseason games suggests something is jumping out at people in my humble opinion. Meaningless or not did anyone notice the concerned look on the opposing DC's face watching rookie Peterman make plays against the daunting Raven D. Peterman to Jones connection clicking. Great post Rochester

#donttradethemidget

Its all good...

Myself personally, I think you know more than your average bear when it comes to the QB/position my friend,

Competition at the QB position is a good thing...

I wasn't one of them

Yes it is, Tuel would have been knocked around like a ping pong ball/INT's against the Raven/Schwartz starting D's IMO

Tuel and Peterman are leagues apart IMO.

I agree, most rookies are not ready to start, but Peterman stood out to Gruden as the most NFL ready rookie he has coached up in years. To me its about the best compliment you can get from a former NFL coach in my humble opinion.

I've watched enough deer in the headlights raw rookies to know Peterman is already showing subtle attributes well beyond his years.

I believe the poster was saying you can't be afraid of ruining Peterman by starting him. Its become the norm now to start promising rookies just like Buffalo will press to start the one they draft next year vs another wasted season. The window to evaluate Peterman is small...

The writting is on the wall for Taylor and his future with the Buffalo Bills in my humble opinion my friend. I don't think it even matters how well T T plays...

Well you know I'm not one of them JM and identify Taylor as a good game manager/serviceable. I just feel like Peterman has a small window of opportunity to show what he can do and it might be smart looking long term for Buffalo to use it. with all due respect my friend

I agree vote split right down the middle ,but half of us are stupid ...

and Taylor does?