Figster

The O and D's not new? lol, ok The regular season can't get here soon enough...

and its still a new O to the players...

now that can agree with Kirby, thanks

understanding from what, the norm vs a team installing 2 new systems? Anyone got a link or are we just making assumptions?

When a new O is being installed preseason becomes a little more important then an evaluation of newcomers in my humble opinion.

Contrary to what many believe there is no going back and forth for me because I stand behind the whole 53 man roster. insane break out numbers? ummm no, Do you honestly believe Taylor played better then Peterman during preseason? you won the bet because McD is a stand up guy IMO. I have never, I repeat never stopped being a fan of T T...

after arguing like cats and dogs for years it became obvious to me that I was fighting a losing battle cheers

I have much respect for your posting bandit

Do you realize the G Roman O made a QB look good thats currently unemployed because of the low volume of passing attempts? Or that the newly installed Dennison O requires the QB to work from the pocket?

I get having a difference of opinion on this subject , what I don't get is the need for insults.

Taylor has a winning record in the NFL after two seasons and given a starters salary to continue playing for Buffalo. While I believe the Bills may have hit the jackpot in Peterman its refreshing to see the loyalty returned to Taylor who has proven his loyalty to his team. I respect the decision. Myself personally, still a big T T fan, fan of the whole 53 man roster which includes Nathan Peterman. I'm an even bigger fan of the team...

Here, let me help you

I explained my position on the topic once and you gave me a thumbs up by way of acknowledgment so go figure. Is your memory that bad?

I've replied out of courtesy, not because you're adding anything to a discussioon...

You called me a flip flopper and I already agreed so what are you looking to accomplish here.

Curious, do you take sides to an argument? I think I've explained my position on this topic well...

this is what it boils down to and If a small hanful of preseason games is already casting doubt over a veteran QB, Hello...

It accomplishes nothing by way of evaluating the QB That has a much better chance of being in Buffalo's long term future. Normally I would agree with you grb, but Peterman's not your average bear IMO. with all due respect sir I mean seriously, Peterman has played the way I had hoped Tyrod could play.

Peterman has played the way you would expect a veteran starting NFL QB to play while learning a new system/players in my humble opinion.

To me its almost like instant replay, do we see enough to overturn the decision. In my opinion we do and perhaps Dennison and McD feel the same way, but it makes no sense telegraphing that line of thinking to the opposition not just for this Sunday, next Sunday as well in my humble opinion bandit.

I think the Bills brain thrust understands by now T T doesn't perform that well in the pocket and the regular season gameplan with T Mobile behind center will focus more on what Taylor does well in my humble opinion.

After careful consideration grooming the rookie Peterman the way you might a higher draft choice is acceptable to me under the circumstances AFL. My preference is still to play Peterman...

sure, why not...

Its possible Peterman could start game one and have T T ready by game 2 IMO.

As do I