Are you really that satisfied with our QB play?
Am I a lunatic for wanting a QB that can win football games throwing the football?Taylor, Peterman, whoever,
I get the difference of opinion my friend, but not the insult because we disagree.
Tyrod Taylor does not function well in the pocket which makes Dennisons job much more complicated in my humble opinion.
McD/Dennison need to take a hard look at this problem, make some adjustments in how Taylor is utilized, or bench him for the better pocket QB In Peterman.(IMO)
Pounding a square peg into a round hole doesn't work...
...especially at crunch time...
Myself personally, I think Taylor could be a great QB if he could see the field better grb
I had hoped some innovative thinking on Dennisons part could help...
Fergs got the right idea, but since we can't go out ang get all new Oline lets train the ones we have to play lower. (On your knees fellas)
...I can't see...
More the type of information that can tell you something.
thanks
Note: I will say again however, volume or non volume when a team pays more attention to one part of the O/run, another part/pass gets less attention/ attempts on the practice and playing field.
There is no substitute for reps...
The problem with this assessment of Taylors play is the averages are caused by the lowest passing attempts in the league something of which is determined by the OC 's in the Bills run heavy O.
Is the information accurate, sure, but the Bills also led the league in total rushing and average per attempt. ( previous season )
It is an issue, just maybe not for you.
My point is players with obstacles to overcome use other attributes to help them do it.
T Mobiles wheels for instance...
McD will always back the starter until a decision is made to make a change and I wouldn't expect anything different.
I've already acknowledged that we won't see Peterman unless Taylor is carried off the field.
I'm the biggest Taylor fan on the forum