Buffalo716

The Stones always put innuendos in their songs But mick was absolutely talking about the historical context of slavery as well.. he knows how to mix sex drugs pleasure and history Original title of the song was black p****, he even thought it was too insensitive But the opening line... Gold Coast slave ship bound for the cotton fields.. absolutely sets the stage for the song

It's literally a song about the historical context of slave masters People are pussies

I got the tracking like 7 days later and It arrived today! Looks nice!

Just got mine in the mail today!

The Germans bombed Pearl harbor? I thought it was the dolphins and whales

Didn't the Greeks invade the Trojans lol

That wasn't my comparison I'm just reading all the replies and saw you called them mythological lol So I just commented on that

The city of Troy and the Trojan wars are mainly accepted archaeological facts now.. it's not just considered mythology

Gunner lives in England That's a pretty expensive trip

🍻

You know it's funnier the first time somebody said it in the thread 😁✌️

Gandi 😁

That's why I just say natives.. Indian really is the most offensive term Because there's actual Indians living in India

It's coming I just have a history degree so I know about Bill Cody Once people find out he fought in the Indian wars they're going to come for us too.. he literally scalped a chief And none of that means that the Buffalo Bills should have their name changed

The dude erases RBs out of the backfield Easily one of the best in the league at that

The Hallmark of a McDermott and Fraser defense is every player is put in the best chance to succeed Which flies in the face of tremaine Edmonds to outside linebacker because McDermott and Frazier always put their players in their best chance to succeed If McDermott didn't think Tremaine was his mike , he would have moved him a year ago

The term lazy Mexicans has no positive or historical connotation Native tribes painted their face with red ochre for thousands of years.. for battle and ceremony and referenced it themselves I'm not saying this is the story of the Washington Redskins.. but if somebody made that team today.. and said I want to honor natives and their prideful culture and warriors.. I don't think the name would be racist .. as opposed to naming it out of spite or belittling Buffalo Bill Cody scalped a native chief.. the bills are named after a man who killed native Americans

He Removed the name after years of pressure... Let's be real he did not want to change it He stated a hundred times I will never change the name.. he folded because pressure Distancing yourself from a racist owner and actually disliking the name are completely different I think.. Schneider always wanted to keep the name he just fell to pressure

I think it's all how it's used If you walk up to a native and say hey redskin.. that's obviously very offensive But natives used red ochre as war paint for a thousand years.. they have historical context painting their skin red... And referencing it If Dan Schneider said the Washington Redskins represent, The pride of native American warriors... And their history I don't see anything wrong with that

Yeah but Dan Schneider's not the original owner... You can't blame him for somebody else's faults a long time ago Buffalo Bill Cody was a civil war scout and fought in the Indian wars , killed native Americans.. he scalped a chief... The Buffalo Bills don't honor Bill Cody It's just our name

I know plenty of native Americans who liked the name Washington Redskins because they thought it honored them .. and they were glad to be represented in the NFL Not to mention that many natives actually painted their faces red with ocher for a thousand years.. it's historical But Cancel culture is coming for everything If Dan Schneider was out bashing native Americans week in and week out it would be distasteful..but he's always been respectful about it and said it's about pride I don't think there's anything nefarious with the Seminole war chant.. or the Chiefs tomahawk chop It's just something stupid to get the fans in the game.. I really don't think there's anything nefarious behind

Lmao typo I think diggs was just trying to get his feet under him.. he kind of caught it with his feet skipping under him, I think he was just trying to get him back under controls and it looked awkward

Keyword is if he had similar production His draft stock certainly does rise if he plays again though

Fans Are supposed to get excited.. it's literally short for fanatic Players on the other hand are professional athletes and they obviously understand there's a long way left in the season

For sure, but you lose the continuity of a 3-year starter who knows the ins and outs of the scheme Whoever we eventually draft to replace Levi it would be good if he was eased in behind him because Levi knows the system like the back of his hand The new corner will probably be more athletic but absolutely not up to par mentally You can get a mentorship year, where the consummate professional, teaches the Young gun the ways of the NFL