GoBills808

was it just this season if so lmk how much i owe

Pry sure I had a couple bets w people who were convinced Dorsey wouldn't get work in the league again

😂😂'negative value judgement' Knock yourselves out

Who said they shouldnt

will they really lol 😂😂😂What a massive ***** waste of time pining after another team's punter

No That's what people who don't understand statistics would conclude

He actually did get quotes from current (at the time) members of the Bills iirc It wasn't just former disgruntled employees

can you recap that interview

Will it be w the Bills

Bro Allen is part of the deal

You're not swapping rosters w the Bengals over the last 3 years foh w this

Yes it's a tidy story but I'm not entirely sure it's true they chalk up the early EPA returns under Dorsey by saying 'well the Bills are anomalous' and then similarly fail to account for the decline in EPA under Brady which corresponded w more wins. It's not meant to be entirely predictive but the difference in actual scoring between the two offenses was <1 ppg...is that enough to account for such a dramatic difference in win/loss%? I would say almost certainly not I maintained then and still do that the metrics supported the idea that the offense would find itself through the midseason lull v Giants-Broncos (roughly)...these guys seem content to chalk up the difference in it's entirety to playcalling differences in certain key areas between the respective OCs and I think that's too convenient

Known Chiefs troll disagreeing w you=argument won

basically said they were farming EPA under Dorsey by staying ahead of schedule due to explosive plays in traditionally tough down/distance situations and that it flipped under Brady due to willingness to run the ball on early downs between the 30s...more (slightly) scoring lower EPA

...

This is literally what you wrote never mind he was 1st in value over avg, 1st in CPOE, 3rd in success%, 1st by a mile in ELO, 3rd in EPA, 2nd in win%added @FireChanscome get your boy he's lost

Yeah I'd say it's about as disingenuous as touting our regular season record as proof of good coaching and our playoff record as proof of bad GMing

I don't see why this is so controversial Unless you're arguing that the lack of postseason success is because of Allen (good luck w that), or that a roster that dominates the regular season but mysteriously falls apart in the playoffs is somehow Beane's fault (tenuous)...what are we realistically left to look at

Solid B for me Got the most important position right...some misses in the draft (w not insignificant -ev capital investment at RB) and a few questionable contracts but reasonable pro personnel moves and seems to have a decent feel for finding late round contributors particularly at wideout Would be interested to see how he'd fare w a staff that prioritized offense

You think Allen was the 9th best QB in the league last year? Seriously?

You think the Bengals third string interior OL is better than Ed Oliver? You honestly believe Joe Mixon is actually a 5ypc guy when he averaged 3.8 in the regular season?

I think the Bengals are a perfect example of getting more out of less I certainly don't think they have a better roster than us. Allen is better than Burrow, their wideouts are great but outside that I wouldn't swap rosters over the last 3 seasons.

Look at the comment above this one^^ You have a guy who legitimately blames the GM for players losing one-on-one battles in the playoffs I give up. If this is truly your take there is no scenario where we can find fault w coaching.

So McDermott developed all those guys but Oliver's failure belongs to Beane? How does this even make sense Beane found Allen. What's McDermott's equivalent success?