Neo

I’m no X and O guy, but I can’t say what the Bills are trying to do on offense.

Did it also protect our offensive players?

You’re not crazy. You see, in the past few minutes, all the casinos, all the sharps, all the NFL executives, all the big money interests … like, in unison, changed their minds about who, you know. “needs to win”, because the concept of “profit and loss” re-defined itself globally. The conspiracies are still real, they just changed.

I don’t ever need to see a London game again.

If you were a “sharp”’ wouldn’t it pay to go the books where the “sharps” were not?

I think he came to camp at 305 lbs. He became just what you described and played at 275. memory alert Ken O’Brien still twitches.

Couldn’t they make calls that extend drives, keep chains moving, making every drive a scoring drive? What about pass interference? Should we all take the under every week, winning half and losing half of the unfixed games while cleaning up on the fixed “under” games? Hows it easier?

The most disappointing thing about that fourth, er first, down is Dorsey not believing that they could simply stuff it down Washington’s throat, expected or not.

The most disappointing thing about that fourth down is Dorsey not believing that they could simply stuff it down Washington’s throat, expected or not.

How do you know they didn’t take the over?

I’m with the Original Poster. We should be able to steal from the rich. Oh, and the wealthy. Affluent, too. Don’t forget the comfortable, the satisfied, the successful. The resourceful, the lucky, the hard working … the smart, the frugal … hell, everyone with more than me!

Way too early for an opinion on a review.

My thought without another angle.

I was there. 51 to 3, in a game not as close as the score would indicate. I call this Buffalo’s greatest victory, outside of AFL championships. The Raiders said all week that they’d seen many ‘no huddle, two minute” offenses. I believe Howie was signaling time out walking toward the wrong sideline.

Some funny stuff, here.

Um, you read about seventy five words into what I wrote. I asked the learned. Continue finding posts and creating non sequiturs. People keep looking for reasons to put cheese on cornflakes, sure.

To the learned … does Allen’s throwing motion look different?

Cook has looked outstanding?

Cook don’t impress me much …

2014. Not that I mind one bit.

You enter the draft. If you did anything else, they’d Wonderlic you seven times.

He was the best at what he did. He did something near and dear to all of us. Not many can be described like this, but some can. They’re few and far between. Rick, though, is in a category by himself. In addition to sharing thousands of evenings (thousands!) of competence, art and joy, he taught us lessons. The lessons are his greatest gift, and that’s saying something. 1) Love your work. You will feel it and so will those around you, making the experience better for everyone. 2) Love who you work with. Work becomes less “work”, and everyone’s grateful for that. 3) Be yourself. While the world changes from radio, to television, to inter-webs, to streaming, to 85” high definition, to game animation, remain the same comfortable and familiar voice. You will connect the simple memories of youth with the complicated reality of adulthood. One of the greatest lessons from Rick is that there are experiences that fathers, sons and daughters can share exactly the same way, but they’re rare. Rick was one. 4) Take your work seriously and yourself less so. What a humble man. 5) Love your family. Godspeed, RJ …. I’ll see you again soon.

Great documentary. No one looked good. No person, no organization. Watch it. Impressions. Enablers and profiteers everywhere. Father that participates, but bemoans no accountability. Agent that perpetuates the fraud - wonder who’d take a call from him after watching? Best wishes to kid in his second act.

Respectfully, I don’t think you’re close to what I did say. I also don’t think re-saying it will satisfy you. You’re speaking back and forth to several things and mixing them together and writing to me. The things are decisions, circumstances, judgement, outcomes and consequences. I spoke to one, narrow, issue or aspect of the situation. Go back and see if you can find it. Try this mishmash of sentences, independent and related at the same time. Young men have lapses in judgment. Ruggs exercised very bad judgement. There was a very bad outcome as a direct result of his exercise. He should be punished. The inter webs encourages, among other things, sanctimony, hypocrisy and manufactured disagreement. I’ve exercised bad judgement and no one’s been hurt. I hesitate self reflectively before I criticize people who exercise bad judgement. I feel for him and for her. Outcome is irrelevant to everything I wrote in my original post and everything of interest to me in this thread. That’s all I got.

I understand. I agree. Sentences in our legal system often rely on outcome, which I deliberately avoided. THERE’S a philosophical debate, to be sure. If they’re each your son, sentence notwithstanding, who do you judge more harshly? That’s my post. To me, they committed the same crime. The random trajectories of the bullets and random configuration of the audience determined the outcome. Adieu !!