Security

This is partially true......if you are in IT, most companies do not feel they can competently weed out potential IT candidates, and they rely on recruiters to make sure people are not full of crap, and they are not wasting the time of the company by interviewing inferior candidates or those without the actual knowledge.

Need to make a no crapping in the urinals one, feces is only part water soluble and janitors must use their hands to pick the poop up

Not safe in Buffalo for Mike, didn't a family member stab him? I would want to get away.

The signs in the trees could be Gareth's new way of luring people in to eat them.

Attending college helps when you move out of town, and where you are from can help, to a point as well. I got several opportunities from knowing people who knew common friends 900 miles away and got hired at my first business job in Atlanta long, long ago, because they guy hiring was from Buffalo.

Painless prick? No pain, no gain, sloppy vagina. yes.

You should have no issue asking the recruiter what the range is that he is recruiting for, and also no issue asking that person what the current market rate is for a person like yourself as well. They sometimes get paid a flat rate based on placing you, but I have found they make more money, the more money that you make, so it is in this person's best interest to place you at as high of a salary as possible in most cases. Don't be shy.

I agree on the stretch, I want to know more. I have read the comics or books, but in this TV version, this thing that lead them to cannibalism, I would like to know. I do not know what lead The Hunters to cannibalism in the comics. I am thinking that the people who took over the group from Gareth ate people, so Gareth's people ate them.

Only won 11 games in regulation as it was last year, they are downright terrible. I sure hope they get McDavid.

So, you think Gareth and Terminus was a sanctuary, and then the "bad" people came and took over before Gareth got them back? Do you think the second group starting eating Gareth's people, and then Gaeth's people fought back and ate the other people and then it just became how it was? I don't get what they are implying about Gareth's group and the other group.

SHe bought the watch for her husband I thought?

This show is so much fun to watch,

Duke WIlliams was the worst player on the field yesterday, for more than the pass interference penalty, his slow jogs in coverage were pathetic.

She is pretty hot.

What would banging a walker be called? Think you would catch walker disease? hahaha Looks like a commercial is tenderizing Glen like you would to get Wagu!

KYLE ORTON IS THE MAN!!!!!!!!!! hahahaha

hahahaha She was looking for ISIS...... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/05/burglary-looking-for-isis_n_5934472.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/10/3/6879867/ej-manuel-benching-bills-quarterback-kyle-orton

I just get what the lasy teachers are thinking at all. They they can control a 16 year old boy from not talking to his friends about banging them to begin with? These ladies need serious psychological help and prison time if they think this OK. On the side for the boy, it will minimize what he thinks of women as he gets older. It is not a good thing. He will be a hero to his friends for a bit though.

The freaking better not take any input from Al Sharpton, who is claiming he is helping to select the new Attorney General. http://www.businessinsider.com/al-sharpton-says-hes-helping-pick-the-next-attorney-general-2014-9

Pretty clear guns are necessary since bad guys will always have guns, knives, whatever weapons, guns are needed.

Anything with a best in all of America actually is kind of dumb. Great pizza at Bocce though.

Not sure the Viper will do much better. Then they decide to put KO in, the Bills will say EJ is hurt and and Tuel will dress as the number 2. I did predict 1 month before Orton signed with Buffalo on this board that the Bills would sign him though.

People do not go to prison for just pot anymore: http://www.nadcp.org/sites/default/files/nadcp/Facts%20on%20Marijuana%20-%20NADCP_1.pdf http://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/whos_in_prison_for_marij.pdf Plus there are more negatives than positives when you look at the big picture (and I like pot, but I can recognize this). Look at the environmental damage that the hippie pot smoking save the plantet hypocrites do not even consider. http://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/frequently-asked-questions-and-facts-about-marijuana#opposed Couldn’t legalizing and taxing marijuana generate significant revenue? A: While taxing marijuana could generate some revenues for state and local governments, research suggests that the economic costs associated with use of the drug could far outweigh any benefit gained from an increase in tax revenue. In the United States in 2007, illegal drugs cost $193 billion ($209 billion in 2011 dollars) in health care, lost productivity, crime, and other expenditures. Optimistic evaluations of the potential financial savings from legalization and taxation are often flawed, and fail to account for the considerable economic and social costs of drug use and its consequences. This issue is particularly relevant in the marijuana debate. For example, the California Board of Equalization estimated that $1.4 billion of potential revenue could arise from legalization. This assessment, according to the RAND Corporation is “based on a series of assumptions that are in some instances subject to tremendous uncertainty and in other cases not valid.” Another recent report from RAND examines this issue in greater detail. The report concludes that legalization and taxation of marijuana would lead to a decrease in the retail price of the drug, likely by more than 80 percent. While this conclusion is subject to a number of uncertainties, including the effect of legalization on production costs and price and the Federal government’s response to the state’s legalization of a substance that would remain illegal under Federal law, it is fair to say that the price of marijuana would drop significantly. And because drug use is sensitive to price, especially among young people, higher prices help keep use rates relatively low. The existing black market for marijuana will not simply disappear if the drug is legalized and taxed. RAND also noted that “there is a tremendous profit motive for the existing black market providers to stay in the market, as they can still cover their costs of production and make a nice profit.” Legalizing marijuana would also place a dual burden on the government of regulating a new legal market while continuing to pay for the negative side effects associated with an underground market, whose providers have little economic incentive to disappear. Legalization means price comes down; the number of users goes up; the underground market adapts; and the revenue gained through a regulated market most likely will not keep pace with the financial and social cost of making this drug more accessible. Consider the economic realities of other substances. The tax revenue collected from alcohol pales in comparison to the costs associated with it. Federal excise taxes collected on alcohol in 2009 totaled around $9.4 billion; state and local revenues from alcohol taxes totaled approximately $5.9 billion. Taken together ($15.3 billion), this is just over six percent of the nearly $237.8 billion adjusted for 2009 inflation) in alcohol-related costs from health care, treatment services, lost productivity, and criminal justice. While many levels of government and communities across the country are facing serious budget challenges, we must find innovative solutions to get us on a path to financial stability – it is clear that the social costs of legalizing marijuana would outweigh any possible tax that could be levied.

Rumandarain, or Russianese?