Orlando Buffalo

Nothing like setting a scale to make a small increase on a small survey seem large. The change is 1 in 10 over the 2018 number but show me you are easily led by dishonesty.

The demise of the DOE is another fascinating study in L/R dynamics. No one is arguing that in the past 50 years ANYTHING in Education has improved, but some are arguing that they are needed, but I can't figure out why? Their duties can be placed elsewhere easily and eliminate a lot of redundant positions. Right now we are dealing with the fallout of the ending of the federal funds from ESSER that caused a sugar rush of spending over the past 3 years because they gave our district cash but put a requirement on it that it be spent immediately, much of it could completely wasted.

I can answer this easily- too many people lied to them. They(Democrats) said men can be women, whites are more violent per capita, government spending equals quality, a college degree is gender studies should be respected. There is much more but if you only lie to someone when they find out the truth they will hate you.

If you like architecture there is a lot to look at and several frank Lloyd Wright houses that are not the Martin House if you just want to drive by. The sub and battleship on the river are cool. NF is a good pick if you have not seen it, my kids enjoyed it along with us.

Truly imagine what a loser you must be to cheat at such a low stakes sport? And even .ore pathetic to defend the cheating.

The Constitution is not ala carte, we can confer rights onto illegal citizens by a law but it is not by the Constitution. If you want to argue that someone is allowed some constitutional protections but not others then the government can remove them whenever they want. If you want to argue and illegal gets any constitutional protections you must give them all, any other argument makes the Constitution worthless. Illegals have rights, but not Constitutional rights

Something that was truly appalling to me that I heard from a "constitutional scholar" is that people here illegally are given "some constitutional rights". That is on its face wrong and stupid, the Constitution is not ala carte, you have all or none. The government does not get to choose which rights you have once you qualify for any of them.

You truly believe a man who joins a gang in El Salvador, kills a dozen people, escaped thar country and came to the US illegally deserves 5th amendment protections? That is literal insanity, you are so inviting the worst people on the planet to get to the US if possible. how does someone educated actually believe that constitutional rights belong to people here illegally?

These all happened worse under Biden than any other president over the past 50 years.

we are right now at a point where district judges are overruling the president based on very sketchy views of existing law. There is no constitutional law on any books anywhere in the country that says a judge is "required" to protect a violent criminal from extradition to the country they are from, they are choosing to protect the bad guys at the expense of the innocent. I understand the concept of judicial precedence and why we should follow it when appropriate but this is insane.

I am not blasting you because I know it is not your choice or fault, but any legal process that required we need to prove an illegal is a gang member in order to get rid of them is insane. Also any judge that deems someone a gang member but does not want to send them back is evil. I further don't need anymore history lesson, I actually understand too much stupidity of the courts at this point, but honestly think that some judges are happy to allow evil as long as they retain power.

I have not seen it discussed but offensive efficiency is more important to me than simple points. If we score 28 pts on 6 drives that is better than 31 pts on 9 drives, especially if the 6 drive game is turnover free

How does a judge rule that a known gang member from another country has the right to stay in the US? Why does he get protection from returning to his country of origin? how evil do you have to be to defend the violent criminals right to avoid being held accountable by the people they violated? The last question is not to you Frankish I understand your point.

I am watching "The League" again right now for the first time in about a decade and some parts still hold up, especially Yobagoya.

Surprising Homelander is lying again

I can't believe that this is not reductio ad absurdum but actually what Dems are right now arguing. A man who commits multiple murders in another country as a gang member and then illegally comes to the US to commit more crime gets the right to an American trial even if we don't have jurisdiction where they committed the multiple murders. @Roundybout, @4th&long@Homelander, what about that scenario do I have wrong?

The mistake is only that he was not supposed to be sent to El Salvador, ignoring that he was a gang member here illegally. I do find it odd that you care more about the due process of people who are here illegally and routinely break the law than what damage they do.

This lady is hilarious. She complains that people don't recognize words that have existed "since the dawn of time", in the new way she wants it used. She is quite the narcissist to pretend others are disrespecting her when she is disrespectful to them.

Thank you for admitting that the most basic level medicine or how vaccines work are too advanced for you. Even for you this level of trolling is just sad Rushing to a single conclusion without doing further research would be much too quick but 5+% people with cancer, even in a 5 year period, is almost certainly going to have some kind of proximate cause. The number of variables is much to large to claim one but this being random would be 1 in a billion

The point being made was that regardless of how much they pay in taxes they take more from government services than the pay into the system by a very large margin.

Illegals cost our country far more money then they provide, by any honest measure. This kind of argument is the same as being proud of spending 8 billion more on the IRS to gain back 1 billion.

nothing you are saying is related to this situation. Your arguing that he only said words which makes you a liar or stupid.

How is it bad if someone comes to the US, never goes to class, causes protests, helps cause a violent take over of buildings, and then demands money for his family? The fact that you ask that means you have no idea what is happening. Half of Columbia is non citizen students and you literally will trash them all to protect this guy. Do you look at all Latinos as the same also?

No he is not a citizen, I know you don't recognize citizenship but it is true.