Prickly Pete

There is nothing that can compare to having Peterman as a starter. Relax, they have made improvements to the offense, and added to the overall talent level. Last year's WRs should be at least a little better, too. Plus, there is always a chance they can pick up a veteran through a post draft trade, or a camp cut. I'm pretty sure they are aware of the situation.

DaMarkus Lodge?

This was the silliest premise for a thread...maybe it could just be deleted.

yeah, he's only gonna rip through the line for 10 or 15 yards....sux.

The guy has incredible instincts, like a heightened awareness and vision.

he is a RB not a tiny receiver. Roscoe was too small a target, and injured a lot. This guy has nothing to do with Parrish.

They want to have a running game? I think they are going to take a more specialized approach to the RB's kinda like the Patriots have done.

I bet they wanted Montgomery...

I did, the WR are picked over.

People who read that he hasn't run many routes, that he is a one trick pony, and is useless in the Red Zone

I blocked him, no matter.

When did he say that, before or after they selected him?

Stop it.

Bills on the clock? They were showing them on the big screen, thought there was a trade...

Some people feel empowered by playing spoiler.

Time for an offensive playmaker....maybe the best value for the next pick will be a running back?

I agree, and I think they will struggle with a decision like that, because I think they want to get some offensive talent.

I'd be disappointed if they took Greedy, I just don't think DB is a big need right this season (I expect him to be gone anyway), but I had Ferguson in mind when I posted. Depending who is taken above them, I could see them taking Fergusion, and trying very hard to get another 2nd to select one of the WR's.

As much as I want them to improve the offense, the value might still be on the defensive side. Like, they might be able to get a WR in the 3rd that is ranked similar to a guy they would take at 40.

yeah, I'm pretty excited to find out.

I agree that Schopp is the best guy there, and obviously sets out to generate "controversy". I live in Los Angeles, and only listen now and then when I visit Buffalo...it's not very good radio compared to the local LA guys. I have heard Schopp giving "Bills Reports" on an LA station....he is a different guy, and very good. Perhaps it is the state of small market terrestrial radio, but I think most people that complain just feel it would be nice to have a higher standard from the local guys that interact with the community directly. Instead, their "best" option is a guy like Schopp, who even you agree is "playing" the listeners.

So who is getting played, the people that listen and complain, or the people that listen and like it?

Aren't you a Bills fan?

Interesting that Miles Boykin is the highest ranked WR.