snafu

What then? Loud buzzing noise.

I think there should be a primary pitting DC Tom vs. Hal2000 vs. IBM Watson vs. Braniac vs. the guy in the carnival who guesses your weight.

I suppose when Warren gets elected President she can just blindly pick AG names out of a bag. It appears that the derangement syndrome is incurable.

These aren’t a parody? This is the D leadership initial reaction? They should change the strategy.

Wow Jim Comey. Is he a 15 year old emo girl with these tweets?

“...And we’re going to al-Qaim! And then on to Deir al-Zour! Then to Raqqa, and then on to Mosul, Yeeeaaaahhh!!!!”

She was put into a really tough and complex spot and couldn’t overcome it. She never could put the political pieces together to get the plan passed.

What narrative do you have? What supports it? I’m willing to believe that Mueller’s report needs to come out before anyone starts crowing. I’m willing to predict that the report is not going to be a glowing exoneration of Trump. Mueller will probably cast some shade on Trump world and walk that line between calling him a Boy Scout and calling him a criminal. But obviously (like Chris Matthews asked) if Trump DID something, then why didn’t Mueller go after anyone for collusion/conspiracy? Nobody in these 22 months were accused of consorting with Russians to affect the 2016 election. On the other hand, more has come from the past 22 months which would implicate members of the previous administration and bad actors in the FBI for trying to railroad the collusion narrative.

I think it would go something like: put Trump in as much political and perhaps legal jeopardy as they could, and then cut a deal with him so that he backs off on the retribution. No comment on Pence.

Yoiks, and Awaaaayyyyy!!!!!

Maybe you should call your Congressional Representative. I’m sure they can add this “news” article to their existing “culture of corruption” investigation. Or, wait, have they started that inquiry yet? Does what you cited rise to (your words) “most corrupt POTUS of modern times”?

That’s a statement you should detail — with some example of corrupt acts he actually committed as POTUS. I’m not saying you’re right or wrong (because there are a LOT of ways to look at it for every President), but I am saying that you’re making a fact out of your opinion.

Or both. Don’t forget that option.

Ive asked you before and I’ll ask you again (I don’t know why I’m doing this): Are you upset that your President is NOT a traitor? You seem upset by that.

You mean libs can’t prove the fiction that they made up.

Hurry, Barr, hurry!!!

But Gillibrand wouldn’t.

The spin that's to come...going to need a vomit bag.

Hey, where did those goal posts go?!?!

That Rosenstein Letter is pretty remarkable. I'm only halfway through it (probably don't have time to finish it until later tonight -- the UB game, and other commitments are in the way). Rosenstien mentioned the difference between counterintelligence and Criminal investigations. I'm sure those lines blur pretty easily, and they're not mutually exclusive anymore. This snip caught my eye: "Special Counsel Mueller is authorized to investigate potential criminal offenses. Counterintelligence investigations involving any current or future Russian election interference are not the Special Counsel's responsibility." Back to the game. Second half just started.

Wakanda is a perfect example of a red-lined neighborhood.

If reparations in some way shape or form are adopted, then shouldn't affirmative action, government contract preferences, and any other legislated "equal playing field" regulations be cut back or eliminated?

Ha, good point. Maybe the flip side to solving the late term abortion issue is to lower the voting age to “immediate”. Imagine all the pandering those infants would get.

Clinton had an 85% chance of winning on Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 10:25PM, according to this NYT article. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html That would be 861 days, 20 hours, 47 minutes ago.

Yes.