HamSandwhich

No, actually, since we don't know and it's logical that it's easier get across the border with no wall than it is if there is a physical barrier, in this particular scenario, the "better safe than sorry" saying is the appropriate stance. It's logical to protect your borders, just like you have walls on your house to protect from the elements AND from intruders. That's why there are walls around prisons. That's why there are walls around those houses of the affluent. It's not likely they will be robbed, but just in case. Right? Why do they have to be on foot? Why do they have to illegally cross with donkeys? Is that truly how you think they would do that? You probably think that walls can be moral or immoral too?

There is a simple reason why this is happening. It's because the far left and some not so far left democrats pander to the lowest denominator. The more intersectional racism, sexism, etc you can claim victimhood on, the more points you get. Those who are illegal immigrants are higher on the totem pole of victimhood than your regular garden variety homeless person who grew up in the US. So the immigrant population gets put on a pedestal and morality is the flag they wave. Meanwhile, our homeless victims are second class citizens to those illegal immigrants. It's a backward way of thinking.

How does anyone actually know this? It doesn't make any sense to make this argument. Those who enter illegally through non-ports of entry try to do it without being detected I'll bet and thus would be hard to keep track of. I want to see the research done on this. Where are you getting this source?

So, since a wall will do absolutely nothing as you claim, what is your idea that is so great? Most people are not saying "lets just humor him" when they are talking about why we should build a wall, they are saying it's a drop in the bucket in the scheme of the national budget. The democrats would not sneeze at putting those into bloated government spending elsewhere tenfold.. Tell me, do you think a wall has any affect at all or is it nothing and everyone will easily bring ladders and scale the wall? My opinion is that there are bigger fish to fry as far as illegal immigration, such as the millions that overstay their visas. That does not mean you can't plug a "low lying fruit" first such as a wall which would not cost nearly as much and is not nearly as complicated as the immigrants overstaying their visas. Fix what is easiest to fix and would, for sure, have an affect on immigration to a certain degree (and I would think it's a higher degree than most dems give credit), and then move on to more complicated issues. Say you have a condition that causes excruciating pain, so much so that you cannot be gainfully employed. Say that the doctor says, well we are working on a cure for your condition but we haven't quite figured out what's happening but we are investing money and resources to figuring it out. The good news is, we have this pill you can take that will allow you to work but will not cure your pain completely. Would you tell the doc, nah, come back when you can cure it completely? I would assume not.

The Pats D is giving up 6 yds per carry for opposing running QBs? Run, run, run and then throw it over the top to Foster! Win baby!

I'm not a big shot bovine farmer like yourself, just picked an impressive number out of thin air. I know, amazing right?

A bovine to replace him? Can't be much worse right? A 2k lbs heifer, who's gonna get past one of those?

I'm pickin' up what you're puttin' down now old man! ?

Not sure what you're getting at here...

Was just watching Fox news and they were doing a piece in a bar in Missouri. There was a dude who was wearing a coat that said Tass News with the Fox news emblem as the background. I looked up Tass news and it is a Russian news network. Surprised they didn't catch that guy before going live...

To my mind, this is a completely a referendum on the Dems ridiculous clown show handling of the Kavanaugh situation. I know it motivated me to vote red and I convinced my wife based on that.

Yeah, I knew that, just was not sure if they were an affiliate or apart of CNN or MSNBC or whatnot? Simulcast or something like that.

I don't know what Yahoo news is, if its affiliated with any of the big news channels but they've just admitted that there is no blue wave either. "Maybe a blue ripple if anything at all". LOL

Leodis Benjamin? Hands of an angel?

Who?

Darn millenials!

Yep, we do

LOL, shifty guy that shifter

I'm not anti tyrod, I just don't think there's any chance. Been there, done that. They are not looking to win a ton of games this year imo. At this point, it's roster evaluation and tyrod could win us a game too many.

Lol, this was said with Ralph Wilson and I venture to guess that it would be said under any owner until they start winning.

...but...how about yes?

What? You've already made your decision on Allen. I don't think Allen is our guy yet but he is not yet not our guy. People are nuts man.

Tyrod no! Bradford sucks too, but only if he's cheap. No worse than DA. Just start Peterman and be done with this season!

It was right in front of the damn official too