FireChan

Right but filling the holes with Washington and Lawson is less than guaranteed.

Play calling is honestly the funniest because every fanbase in whole league complains about it.

They did this, IIRC. Still learning? They've owned the Sabres for 7 years. Relevant? We were relevant before at 9-7 with a ferocious defense. The Pegulas came into the picture and made us "relevant" by hiring a loudmouth loser who wrecked the team and then fired him. If anything, the Bills were more of a laughingstock and joke with that idiot Rex making big promises and getting basically laughed out of Buffalo. There are many ways to skin a cat and many ways owners can be bad. Just because they waste money doesn't make them good.

What?

lol, fans are the problem because they want to win? What claptrap.

Shocked at how many folks want to revamp and make a playoff push this year. Personally, I don't see that being successful.

You'd be adding 3 more holes right there. Not to mention the DE spot wide open right now.

Assume that the GM and HC are in place for the next 3 seasons. Personally, I go with 2. We're in a transition period. Take a year to find a QB or 2 high in the draft and make a run in 2018.

Time for Russ to show he can carry the team even more and earn that paycheck. Drafting a handful of All-Pros and lucking into a All-Pro RB catches up to you when they approach 30 and get paid.

I didn't know we were graced by the Pegulas' own consigliere. Sounds like an awesome guy tbh. Live a little. Wow, you know the children too? Do you babysit?

I guarantee the Pegulas vote "yes" to the relocation of the Raiders, so i don't know how much credit should be given to them, to be honest.

Brady played the first half, but hey, narrative is king.

Yes. That goes for every FA and coach who chooses to grace us with their presence, as well.

I'm glad the team is in Buffalo. They have so far been bad owners.

Yes I would've. I said I wanted to at the time. That's not hindsight. What is so hard to understand about that?

What would you consider a "bust" rookie season? Uh, I guess around a Gabbert rookie year? If Watson has a similar rookie season as EJ did, you'd draft another QB in the 1st round in 2018? Already answered, yes. One year is all he'd get? What? Who said this? Not likely. What?

You said "if he busts." I assume you were making that call after year 1. In reality there's a couple scenarios I could see happen. 1: Best case - Watson plays well, shows progress throughout the year, coaching staff is pleased with his grasp of the offense, Bills go anywhere from 6-10 to 9-7. Would still take a QB in the first next season 2: Most likely - Watson has his share of gaffes, bad games, good games. Serious questions remain about his abilities in the NFL. Bills go anywhere from 7-9 to 4-12. Would still take a QB in the first next season 3: Worst case - Watson is terrible, can't play at this level, throws picks left and right, doubts he'll ever put it all together. Bills go anywhere from 6-10 to 2-14. Would still take a QB in the first next season. 4: Injuries - Watson plays around the #2 scenario but only plays 6-10 games due to injuries, or heaven forbid, not more than a game or two. Would still take a QB in the first next season. The bottom line is exchange any of the Bills 1st rounders in the last decade with a franchise QB and we make the playoffs. Gilmore, Dareus, Watkins, Shaq versus Luck, Cam, Carr/Bridgewater, Wentz/Dak is a no brainer. Season #2: Open competition between Watson and 2018 rookie QB. Whoever wins plays. Then at the end of that year, you'll know if Watson is the guy or not and already have a backup in the wings. How much better off would the Bills have been to have Carr waiting behind EJ when we had to yank him in 2014? Guys like Dareus and co are great pieces and nice to have, but they aren't getting you to the playoffs, let alone winning you a Superbowl without a QB.

Probably 1st. Draft another next year.

Sammy's foot surgery is fine and Shaq doesn't need shoulder surgery. Oh. Wait.

A minor blip on the grander point of correctness.

Yes, Watson. Ditch TT.

What you call a matter of happenstance, I call making the wrong decisions prematurely on QB's due to desperation. Thinking Fitz and EJ were the answer was wrong. Prescott got a DUI? Can't take him. We only take good boys like Darby and Karlos and Seantrel and Kiko, along with those saints in Incognito and Percy Harvin.

Two QB's taken in the upper half of the draft in the last 8 years, Doc. We don't take enough.

None of what I posted is skewed or false.

Few teams are good. We should probably try something new rather than emulate the Jags and Browns model of not taking QB's.