FireChan

Are they all Jews?

There is no logic. Balance is not synonymous with lesser QB's.

The Pats would be exciting, but the Ravens will probably offer him more.

We upgraded some positions from decent to very good or elite. The Jets went from garbage to elite at some positions. I think that's the difference.

I hope we planned for this.

Terry is cheap.

Perhaps there's another move we'd like to make.

Yes, but is there a downside, to either to the team or the owner or to Mario that I'm missing?

I remember this masterpiece written at 2am, in a questionable mental state. http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/162862-we-shouldve-traded-a-williams-when-his-stock-was-high/

Like if it's a conditional 3rd that is a 4th if he doesn't make the Pro-Bowl (just an example), we can't trade our 4th or 3rd to someone else. Because we don't know which one it will be. Right? I mean, what if we traded our 4th and he didn't make the Pro-bowl? Do we have to give him back?

Were they motivated by greed or altruism? You'd think if it was the latter, they wouldn't have taken such sizable paychecks.

Doesn't that mean we can't trade any of those picks until next offseason?

I meant restructure Mario. If that frees up space, doesn't it make sense to do that before cutting even minimal assets like Chandler?

Yes.

If that was how this business worked, Chip will be lucky to work with any players who have the same agent as Mathews.

I am convinced no one would know his name if he wasn't the most hated fantasy player in history.

Why not restructure first, is my question.

I'm jumping in here. Jordy Nelson was shut down when we played him, do you not want him? So was Aaron Rodgers, are you "not impressed?" Geno threw 3 picks in 2 minutes against us, is judging his WR really fair?

Ah, so the draft is sufficient for you?

What backwards logic are you using for your first point? As long as you cut a guy, you don't have to worry about adapting schemes? Okay. As to 2, our starting TE right now is Gragg. Is he not the worst skill player on the starting lineup? Let's say we don't land Clay, do we adapt to Gragg or just cut him so it's "problem solved." As to 3, of course you pursue other, better fits. The real question is do you cut guys who can at least start before you get someone else? Bonus question: If we couldn't afford Clay (zero cap) would we have cut Chandler? 2nd bonus question: Why are we cutting guys for cap room when we can just have Mario restructure?

How do you feel about participation trophies?

I didn't want to come off overly negative yesterday, but if the plan was to hope Evans got cut, I wasn't a fan of that plan. Too many variables and not enough we could actively do.

Remain calm! All is well!

He hasn't successfully addressed it, would be the most accurate.

I don't think we need another CB.