FireChan

So 4 years, give or take?

So you're telling me the best move is for the Bills to make the best deal possible?

How many defensive rookies have come out and truly been "leaders?"

No. I think he has been mentally destroyed. If anything, he'll have a handful of decent games followed by terrible play.

He played the first four games and sucked.

And he's slow.

I bet those drunk drivers felt bad about the people they killed too. Morons.

We had a QB who got everyone involved back then.

Whaley took a chance on EJ taking another step and he gave him a weapon to do it with. Remember that the offensive cupboard was pretty bare going into 2013. We drafted 3 WR's in each of the first 3 rounds in 2 years. There really wasn't any other way to address the WR position through the draft more than we did. I'm not a big Whaley cheerleader, and I do think he gets ahead of himself. That said, being a gambler has paid off sometimes in the NFL. In Sammy's case, it probably did. For better or worse.

And the fact he was behind Harvin for 6 weeks or so on the depth chart.

Thanks for your insight.

That's because I can't follow a conversation. That one is on me. I don't even remember what point I was trying to make.

Where do you think we are?

I was making a more general point that things that fundamentally went against what the Founders would want ended up gone. Eventually.

Because it was worse in one stat and better in almost every single other one. It's really that simple.

Those afflicted with little-city syndrome.

Decisions that fundamentally changed the Republic like the National Bank? I don't need you to tell me I'm correct.

Could anyone be more sure of their opinion after getting an argument destroyed than you? A"truth?" Please.

Weren't the Founders by and large wealthy land owners?

They don't.

Or the second half of the season.

Is there room in this hierarchy for a fake libertarian jester?

There was talk of change because the plan failed horribly.

Pats 1 - Bills offense goes TD, 3 and out. Bills defense forces a 3 and out after our TD, and allows a TD after our offense goes 3 and out. Ergo, you blame that 7 points on a single offensive 3 and out. That's #1. Bengals - Bills offense goes TD, 3 and out. Bills defense forces a 3 and out after our TD, and allows a TD after our offense goes 3 and out. Ergo, you blame that 7 points on a single offensive 3 and out. That's #2. Pats 2 - Bills offense opens the second half with a TD drive, 3 and out. Bills defense forces a 3 and out after our TD, and allows a TD after our offense goes 3 and out. Ergo, you blame that 7 points on a single offensive 3 and out. That's #3. And he brings it home with 1 game to spare! That's how you win in 3 moves, folks.

I found one because that's the one I knew for sure was incorrect. Fact check your own data points, please. If you "run the numbers," and include that 7 points, it will be incorrect. If you blame the offense for a TD scored after a single 3 and out, you definitely are. I guarantee I'd find that at least 3 times in your "analysis."