R. Rich

All the king's horses and all the king's men can't put this crap back in the king's horse.

Who's to say they're not one and the same?

Ham has an annoying way of getting stuck in your throat, especially near podiums.

Your sources seemed quite imposing in Virginia.

Sounds like more of Chris Clayton paraphrasing John Mortensen's comments from Art Irsay.

Does an executive's wife's cousin's uncle's brother in law's nephew's best friend's hairdresser's therapist's trainer's astrolgist's cab driver's boss' lawyer qualify?

That the Bills will remain in Buffalo for the 2006 season. Take that, Mort and Clayton!

True, but he also compiled the following stats in the later months of the season (November, December, January): November 9-12 December 10-16 January 1-1 Even by taking off last season's horrible stats, you're left w/ the following: November 8-10 December 10-12 January 1-0 In the 6 Novembers, 6 Decembers, and 2 Januarys Haslett coached the Saints: Months where Saints were above .500 mark: 4 Months where Saints were @ .500 mark: 2 Months where Saints were below .500 mark: 8

The percentage on the posts whining about posts?

He needs to be hired for that to happen?

I've already mentioned how I am opposed to him because of the way his Saints teams choked toward the end of the season, plus the fact that he admitted taking steroids in his playing days, then alleged one of my favorite all-time Bills, Kent Hull (if you read between the lines of his statement) did the same. This is not the kind of person I want leading the Bills. Please look elsewhere, Marv and Ralph.

A guy who admitted to taking steroids (only for a little bit in the offseason......riiiiiiiight!), led a habitually underachieving team in New Orleans that folded @ the end of the season annually, AND accused one of the greatest Bills (and, arguably, my favorite all-time Bill) of also using steriods? No thanks.

Bills? Organizational structure?

If the Pats lose tomorrow, Mangini could be the Jets' head coach on Sunday.

I remember when I was going over to Berlin to begin my 2 year tour overseas. I sat next to John Huarte, the QB @ Notre Dame who hooked up w/ Snow to make a great 1-2 punch for the Irish (good enough for Huarte to win the Heisman). A very humble guy, considering he did win the Heisman and did get to be on a Super Bowl champion (KC Chiefs).

That other Bush guy (I think his name is Reggie?) is going to have his press conference in a few minutes (1:30pm, I think) to announce if he'll declare for the draft or not. Gee; I wonder if he will....

1 and 2

Not to rain on your parade, but didn't Curtis Martin also rush for 1,000 yards in 8 consecutive seasons? I'm not 100% sure, but I thought he did.

I like that mock. Don't know if Watson will be around for a third round pick. If he is, I'd say take him! He's more of what we need: a 2 gap run stuffer. I keep seeing people say take Rodrique Wright or Claude Wroten. While they are very talented tackles, we need a run stuffer more than another athletic tackle that can rush from the inside. Watson is a better fit for that need than either Wroten or Wright. Jacobs is an intriguing pick. I'd think that Watson would be more of a priority than Jacobs in the 2nd, but if Jacobs were available w/ an early 3rd, why not? Devin Hester? NO WAY, especially for a third! The guy regressed horribly this year, and I'd steer clear of him.

Finally!

I guess the people who do the hiring know more than we fans do. That's how people like Dan Henning end up getting jobs (he's doing a fairly decent job in Carolina) even though we fans think it's a stupid move.

That's about right.

The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind...

The Hall doesn't know what it wants to be. If it was all about stats, Lynn Swann wouldn't get in. If it was all about championships, Tommy McDonald wouldn't get in. When McDonald was inducted, I figured it was only a matter of time before Swann was, because they had run out of excuses. Both had compelling arguments for induction and both had been shelved numerous times before.

That bastard.