B-Man

WORLDWIDE REACTION:

No need to read past this made up statement The profession that you are looking for with daily predator news is Education. .

After His Murder, New York Times Assassinates Charlie Kirk’s Character Brianna Lyman FTA: Hours after Charlie Kirk was murdered, allegedly by a shooter who accused him of “spreading hate,” The New York Times falsely accused Kirk of making antisemitic statements. After getting pushback for using lies to assassinate Kirk’s character, instead of publicly apologizing, the Times’ Ashley Ahn and Maxine Joselow quietly issued a small correction noting the comment was not Kirk’s but a quote he was critiquing. “An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement,” says the correction notice. Friends and colleagues of Kirk’s slammed the dishonest practice, with Riley Gaines posting on X: “They lie, let their audience read it and believe it, then issue a half-hearted hidden correction at the end of the story hours (or even days) later. This is exactly how people like Charlie Kirk end up murdered.” https://thefederalist.com/2025/09/12/after-his-murder-new-york-times-assassinates-charlie-kirks-character/ .

Shocker: Elementary School Teacher in Toronto Allegedly Shows Charlie Kirk Murder Video to 10-Year-Olds Ward Clark https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-scarborough-teacher-accused-of-showing-charlie-kirk-murder-video-to-kids

RELIABLE JONATHAN CAPEHART ON PBS: “I Am Very Concerned” About What The Reaction To Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Will Be. PBS Newshour: New York Times columnist David Brooks and Jonathan Capehart of MSNBC join Amna Nawaz to discuss the week in politics, including the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk and the tough questions it raises about the political environment in the country. * * * * * * * * * [Capehart:] But because of who the victim was, just in terms of our politics, but also who he was in terms of the president and this administration, this is one thing that I have to factor in to my thinking about all this when I look at the reaction from the president and his administration, that this just this wasn’t just the murder of someone who was a like-minded person. This was family to them. And I try to keep that in mind as I watch the reaction. But I have to tell you, I am very concerned about what that reaction is going to be in the days and weeks and months ahead. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/09/13/capehart_i_am_very_concerned_about_what_the_reaction_to_charlie_kirks_assassination_will_be.html Norm Macdonald, call your office:

The picture of Tyler Robinson's ideology is becoming clearer and clearer, and it is the complete opposite of the left-wing attempt to claim he was actually a "right-wing groyper." That such a gambit was even tried is laughable.

Hegseth Meant What He Said: Air Force SGT Facing Consequences for Celebrating Charlie Kirk's Death Words only have power when backed by action. Yesterday, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced there would be zero tolerance for military members mocking the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Today, those words are being backed by action as an Air Force Master Sergeant is under investigation for what Under Secretary of the Air Force Matt Lohmeier describes as conduct unbecoming of a non-commissioned officer. https://twitchy.com/eric-v/2025/09/13/hegseth-meant-what-he-said-air-force-sgt-facing-consequenses-for-celebrating-charlie-kirks-death-n2418906

Italy's P.M.

.

The Generation That Charlie Kirk Inspired Will Carry On in His Place The murder of Charlie Kirk has left a void that will not be easily filled. In the words of his wife, Erika, 'He was a force.' He terrified the left because he was everything that they could never be. Everything most politicians wished they could be. He rejected the angry discourse that dominates the modern political landscape. He didn't yell and scream. There was no name-calling or insults. He had a gift. He could disagree without disrespect. Even when he was being disrespected. He spoke with people, not at them, and it worked. Event after event, campus after campus, student after student, He made being conservative cool again. The left had no answer to his kind smile and common-sense conversations. Charlie Kirk was a unicorn. He was the gentle giant of the conservative movement. He proudly professed his faith in God, his love of family, and his belief in America. Evil may have killed the man, but it failed to silence him. If anything, his message is being amplified through the very same kids he dedicated his life's work to. https://twitchy.com/eric-v/2025/09/13/charlie-kirk-vigils-n2418883

THE LEFT’S BIGGEST FEAR IS THAT THE NORMALS WILL START TO STAND UP FOR THEMSELVES. That’s why they hate Kyle Rittenhouse, and that’s why they killed Charlie Kirk.

THEY CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH: The Left Doesn’t Want You to Know the Truth About Charlie Kirk’s Killer. Whenever a crime hits the national headlines, the left seems to leap straight to politicizing it. A mass shooting? Must be a white Christian nationalist. When Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman and was shot, the media literally called Zimmerman a “white Hispanic.” Why? Because the narrative demanded it. The left is always obsessed with the race, gender, religion, and ideology of both the victim and the perpetrator—and if the facts don’t fit their preferred narrative, the incident gets buried or twisted. Now, they’re doing it again—this time with the man who killed civil rights leader Charlie Kirk. We learned Friday that the man suspected of killing Kirk was caught and arrested, and the left is really working hard to invent a story where Robinson is a Trump supporter—even though that narrative makes no sense at all. munition casings with mocking left-wing anti-fascist slogans—“Hey, fascist! Catch!”—and even one marked with “Bella ciao,” an anthem tied to leftist resistance fighters. These weren’t just random scribbles; they were declarations steeped in the rhetoric of the radical left. Some casings contained juvenile internet meme jokes like “Notices, bulges, OwO what’s this?” and “If you read this, you are gay LMAO.” This is exactly the kind of unserious trolling style you’d see from fringe leftist posters online. It was unmistakably left-wing and politically motivated. But the left is still trying. An X account with five million followers promoted a fake photo of Robinson in a Trump shirt. Others are sharing fake donor information, claiming Robinson was a Trump donor. The image has gone viral, with leftists passing it around as if it were gospel truth—despite the fact that common sense alone makes clear it’s a lie. Think about it: the idea that Robinson was politically aligned with Charlie Kirk is laughable. Yet the falsehood is being pushed with deadly seriousness. They pulled the same stunt with Thomas Matthew Crooks, the would-be assassin of President Trump, even though he had donated to leftist groups through ActBlue. Some on the left may be so desperate to believe the narrative that they’ve convinced themselves it’s real. But most know better. They spread it anyway because it serves their political agenda. This is deliberate misinformation, poisoning public discourse right before our eyes. Think about why the left needs to repeat this lie over and over. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/09/12/the-left-doesnt-want-you-to-know-the-truth-about-charlie-kirks-killer-n4943648

After Tyler Robinson, the left must finally quit encouraging political violence By Post Editorial Board https://nypost.com/2025/09/12/opinion/after-tyler-robinson-the-left-must-finally-quit-encouraging-political-violence/

MORE:

.

They could have hit the brakes after the softball shooting. They didn't. They could have hit the brakes after the SPLC shooting, but they didn't. They could have hit the brakes after the Rand Paul beating, but they didn't. They could have hit the brakes after the 2 Trump assassination attempts (3 if you count the guy on stage in 2016 with a knife) they didn't. And now, after a successful assassination of, like, an influencer, they are blaming the same people. This is different. If they aren't going to change over this, they aren't going to change over anything.

NEWS

.