B-Man

Gibberish, I am 'believing the video. JOHN NOLTE: Time Issues Humiliating Correction Admitting Kamala Supports Taxpayer-Funded Gender Surgery for Illegals. Despite all of this being true, here’s how Time covered this moment: “The former President … falsely claimed that Harris “wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison.” Now, on top of Time being staffed with lousy, lazy, partisan, left-wing activists who spread misinformation, there’s another reason Time spread this lie… The idea of taxpayer-funded sex change operations for illegal aliens is so outside the mainstream, so wackadoodle, Time likely didn’t even bother to fact-check Trump’s statement. It was simply assumed Trump had invented this because no sane person would ever support something so ridiculously dumb. Honestly, what a way to attract every deviant on the planet to sneak into America — Free sex changes, girls! Well, much to Time’s humiliation, the truth will out and the outlet was forced to not only issue a correction, but through a correction, a helluva lot more people will read the correction than Time’s dumb article, and the word is out that Kamala does indeed support taxpayer-funded sex-change operations for illegal aliens: Correction, Sept. 11 The original version of this story mischaracterized as false Donald Trump’s statement accusing Kamala Harris of supporting “transgender operations on illegal aliens in prison” As a presidential candidate in 2019, Harris filled out a questionnaire saying she supported taxpayer-funded gender transition treatment for detained immigrants. What’s especially interesting is that at no time since this news broke has Kamala or her campaign backed off of this wackadoodle belief. She actually believes this, and as she made clear, her values have not changed. https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2024/09/11/nolte-time-issues-humiliating-correction-admitting-kamala-supports-taxpayer-funded-gender-surgery-for-illegals/

Trouble in Smear-Land

.

.

.

If it follows the usual left's narrative. . . . . . . . . LOL

Hmmm, This isn't what you (PPP) are telling me happened. Some undecided voters not convinced by Harris after debate with Trump By Helen Coster and Tim Reid Sept 11 (Reuters) - Kamala Harris was widely seen as dominating Tuesday's presidential debate against Republican former president Donald Trump, but a group of undecided voters remained unconvinced that the Democratic vice president was the better candidate. Reuters interviewed 10 people who were still unsure how they were going to vote in the Nov. 5 election before they watched the debate. Six said afterward they would now either vote for Trump or were leaning toward backing him. Three said they would now back Harris and one was still unsure how he would vote. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/some-undecided-voters-not-convinced-by-harris-after-debate-with-trump-2024-09-11/

But what did voters take away from it all? A CBS focus group of Pennsylvania voters was interesting on the subject. It had five people, three thought Harris won, and two thought Trump won. One black female voter who thought Trump won said Harris just repeated everything that Biden has said in the past. That was right on target. Harris just repeated all the hoaxes that Joe Biden says about Trump — and they're still lies. How is that a "new way forward"? Then the young male voter next to her said Trump made a strong closing statement, asking why she hasn't done all the things that she's proposing now while she's been in office if she wanted to do them. And notice when he says that, the black male voter nodding in agreement, like "Yeah, that's a point," even though he said he thought Kamala won. The young male said he thought she was trying to sell herself as a moderate like Joe Biden did, but she didn't talk about her policy changes, that it was a "facade." https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/09/11/watch-cbs-focus-group-members-savage-kamala-over-main-issue-are-you-better-off-n2179175

Nope. .

Why would they ? She is the perfect puppet/stooge.

Still don't understand the term. That would be equality. and it was a squirrel reply anyway.