BillsFan17

So we didn't keep Reilly on the roster, why? Hopefully we go after someone to help this core.

To me, most coaches/GMs understand the nature of the business. Enough so to not habe the stones to do this type over overhaul. The time frame in which you need to win and keep your job is so short. In turn, without full and total trust from the ownership. Some will call certain moves "rebuilding moves." However, over the past 17 years, none have truly stripped this thing down and started from scratch like we are seeing here.

Lmao, that's right, those 2011 Buffalo Bills were an absolute juggernaut. Ya know, when they forced four INTs.

This whole thread is moot. You are basing this solely off media rankings and not how teams have them ranked. Hence why we see "risers" and "fallers" week in and week out leading up to the draft- because they slowly get more real info about the way teams view these players.

An all pro talent, it's a shame

My only issue with Peterman is, just wait until they actually start game planning. We don't necessarily have pass catchers that will always get open, they are more possession types. The types you have to be very trusting with and more so accurate because the coverage will be tight.

The talented young players all had huge question marks to go along with their talent. I'm not overly happy about it, but the fact of the matter is 7-9, 8-8, 9-7, 6-10x3, etc... just isn't cutting it for me at least. The roster, as constructed before the trades was not necessarily a playoff team, let a long one that was built towards long term competitiveness. I don't think we needed to make as drastic of moves, but if these moves are helping to gear up for a QB in 2018 and putting together a more cohesive roster, then I am all for it. However, we need to now stick with this and not change the course in two or three years.

1) They didn't just show up and and start trading people. They went through camps, practices and pre season games. 2) This year absolutely is a wash. For the first time we aren't going for a mediocre season. We weren't a contending roster and if you thought otherwise, that's on you. I have adamantly spoken out on twitter about the consistent turnover being the biggest issue with this team. Every regime wants to put their stamp on this franchise, but none were willing to call a spade a spade. This team needed to be purged and rebuilt.

So when the best player on your team says no to Keap, we still have journalist pushing him as a potential signing. Yeah, I mean the guy was awful on a rebuilding 49ers, but he'll do well on a rebuilding Bills. Gotcha

Not for nothing, I'm a little tired of those who complained about meaningless wins that kept us from drafting higher in previous years. Now they want to complain that we might finally have the type of season that will position our selves to get a legit QB in the draft, and really try and do this thing.

He's a junior http://www.gowyo.com/sport/m-footbl/2017/roster/5773efd8e4b0bdd131abf43a

So what do I make of them taking Zay Jones in the second round?

I agree the finish def is pretty sharp.

If they used the red grazing Buffalo with a white facemask

No, its asking the guy to be a real QB and not this continuation of college style b/s that hasn't gotten us anywhere. Not for nothing, the sooner people acknowledge the fact, the success of the offense last year was a majority on the ground-the better off we are. Last year's offense is not meant to be the norm. We need a better passing attack.

Very few, if any, had Dorsett falling out of the second, let alone falling that low. Might have went a bit high, but more scouts leaned towards Dorsett going towards the bottom of the first than as low as you projected.

Lmao so draft position has to do with it now? Tyrod went in the sixth for a reason, if we want to play that awfully weak card.

I wonder if matt ryan would agree

The tank started when they brought back Tyrod

Im looking to go this route. Was it difficult to jailbreak the firestick? Also, how is the quality of the games?

I'm sorry, but I also don't buy into these QBS making some sort of Elway/Manning type power move. Plus, in the case of Eli, both teams still ended up with high end QB prospects. I didn't see Rivers refuse to play for the Chargers after the trade, and by all accounts was a very highly touted spec in his own right. Furthermore, the draft has really evolved into such a spectacle and you see what Goodell has done with it. If players start dictating where they want to play and start to diminish that product...

Well Cooks is better than Sammy so, yeah, makes sense why a team would give up the 32nd pick for him. If the Rams bottom out and have the worst record in the league. That second round pick will be... you guessed it 33rd overall. Let not make it sound like the Pats gave up a top pick here. It's easier to back the decision of a team that wins oppose to a team who continuously loses. I mean, in the real world would you listen to a financial adviser who consistently makes his clients money or a guy who had had a track record of 17 years in the red?

I'd like to get in on this as well. Especially considering in his very own draft class Landry who was a second rounder is better than he is.

So he was criminally under utilized, no one will argue that, but again, stacked up against his own class he wasn't worth the fourth overall and if you think Tyrod was suddenly going to blow up and utilize him so much more, when we didn't know if his foot would hold up..

Idiot is consistently changing ish over and not having player to fit new scheme because you drafted them for another scheme. However, I have to admit this regime isnt for a second going to force square pegs into round holes. Also, they don't seem content with mediocre QB play and are gearing up to go ball to the wall for none next year. So the trades aren't idiot, no matter how badly you want to pump that agenda.