My point wasn’t really about what the price would be for Foles, more that Doc was suggesting it would be for a 1 year rental if things didn’t work out. That would mean they aren’t sure about Foles. To me, that seems like a waste of draft capital. You trade for Foles, give up a 2nd, because you believe he can be your starter. It’s why the 9ers did it.
I don’t like the Foles option, I think it’ll turn into the same as Flacco situation in Balt, but if the Bills brass are convinced he’s a starter then you trade and extend him. You don’t use a 2nd round pick for a one year rental, imo.