Mr. WEO
-
Posts
44,472 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Mr. WEO
-
-
Stroud, TO 'Nuff said.
Stroud and TO were tossed away by their previous teams.
-
Finally these Bills are sacking up and making some moves. It's playoffs or Bust for Dick and he knows it. The players will perform better for him as they can all sense the need for W's for the old coach. A big TO injection was what the Doctor ordered for the ofense. Shef will be a Bill soon hopefully as well.
The FO and Jauron have been working the free agent wire hard this year, with a good draft in store. You have to give them credit for trying! Even if it does'nt pay off. Urgency to at least make the post season for sure.
This is sad, really.
-
You can stop reading after he suggests that the Bills are just a Cutler away from winning the AFCE and possibly going to the SB.
The QB is not alive who can bring the Bills to the SB this season.
-
Correct moron, the pot charges that didn't see the light of day. The same charges that you find a need to defend against nobody. Who am I trying to kid? WTF? You have lost it. I was simply saying that you look like a je$k*ff when you say the pot charges were fabricated. How in the world would you know that? What is the point of even trying to speculate on what happened with the supposed pot situation? I don't have a clue, and furthermore what the hell does it matter? He didn't get charged. You chose the path of speculating that the police were corrupt. Then you defended Lynch's honor against dropped charges. So again I say you look foolish. On a side note people get let go on possession of minimal amounts of pot, all the time. That sounds a little more realistic than your fabrication theories.
Pile's right. Look, VOR, the pot charges would add nothing to this guys conviction other than a couple of bucks. The felony was charged. In standard fashion, a plea bargain was arranged/offered/accepted. Justice was served.
If there was not pot, then ML would NEVER have accepted any plea offer. A second year law student from any communtiy law clinic could have had the search tossed. But alas, NOBODY challenged the search. NOBODY challenged the police report (I haven't heard ML or his lawyer do so--have you?).
You look foolish.
-
If so, the AFC East just dodged a bullet. Schefter is usually spot on with these reports and I take his word over someone, like say, Chris Mortensen.
Yeah, cuz Mort's, like, a total DOUCHE! He hates the Bills and thus can't report accurately.
-
Not John McCargo! We'll never get anywhere without him. He's this years defensive centerpiece!
McCargo? He happy to be here and we are happy to have him. DJ said so--and he's a straight shooter, right?
-
I think you're onto something.
Heard he texted Brandon that he wanted a lobster roll for lunch and got one--just like that. Those things come in a hot dog bun yet cost like $14.
-
The pot allegations were fabricated. There is no other explanation for the cops not charging.him with possession seeing as how it was his car, when it was the basis for the search and they tagged him for the gun. Not to mention Santonio Holmes was nailed just a few months prior for the same thing.
The pot was fabricated?? Show me any credible source to substantiate that claim.
First you said they should "test" the pot to see if it was indeed real pot and the guys were not just pretending to be in possession of pot. Then you wanted to check it for DNA to exclude your man ML as the possessor of the possibly fake pot. Now, simply, there was no pot.
You do what ever it is you have to do to convince yourself that Lynch isn't a knucklehead and deserving of all the "respect" you have invested in him.
Possession of less than a ounce of weed is a misdemeanor in California. He would have gotten an appearance ticket and a fine. The DA instead went with the felony gun charge and allowed Lych to plea down to a misdemeanor, but with communtiy service and 3 years of probation. Seeing as Lynch couldn't stay out of trouble for more than 9 months, the gun conviction is much more serious for him.
-
People are talking about us getting 2 1's from Philly. But signing those 1's and ours, or even our 1 and another 1 in a possible trade, costs more than it will to keep him, AND trading him on;y opens up another hole. Like I said before, you don't get Owens and then go out and trade your 27 year old franchise LT. He has all the leverage
How did all that leverage work for him last year? He held out, came back with this tail between his legs--hopelessly out of shape ("F-you my offensive teammates!"), and then showed the world that how great he was by tanking half the year. Still, he got no new contract.
How does he have any more leverage this year? Leverage implies that one can compel another to do your bidding. What can he make the Bills do?? He's still got a contract. He can either make that money or not--that's the only decision he can make. He has no other control over his situation.
Why shouldn't the Bills be apprehensive about paying this guy like a starting QB after last season and off-season?
-
Again, likely back to probably cause.
His attorney would have had to been insane to at least not make the arguement in LA County that this was a DWB related stop. Or, in this case, a Parking While Black offense.
There was no such argument to make or of course he would have made it.
This car had no plates---that's going to get you a tap on the window in every county in this country, Mr. Cochran. Then, there was the fresh marijuana stench. That gets the car door opened. Then there were the blunts. That gets the trunk searched.
Case closed.
This was bounced to a misdemeanor, like many others are for a guy with no such record in the state and not on probation. As soemone else already said, this is like a traffic case for the LA DA's office.
-
Yea, that's a resounding positive to have on your resume.
You go to absurd levels to make bad points WEO. I simply said I believe this team would be most effective, being a run first offense. You accidentally make a great point regarding TO. I think the threat he brings downfield, along with being one of the best blocking WRs in the game, will help running the ball quite a bit. I do think he understands how the two aspects of offense help eachother, if thats what your asking. As far as TO asking why TO is here, I can't make any predictions on that and neither can you. What you fail to understand is that a run first team can also do alot of damage through the air as well. If TO is getting the chance to do his thing and win I think he'll be just fine.
Martz's resume in St Louie is as it is. If going to multiple SBs and losing one or more is "bad", then how would you reassess HOFer Marv?
You understand my point, I think. You disagree of course, but saying a SB loss is a black mark on a coach's resume--you are being disingenuous.
I hope TO does all those things you say and you may be absolutely correct. I suspect he will not be satisfied with his involvement in the offense, based on his previous behavior. Trent is under even more pressure now. We will see what happens.
As for HAley and Weis, let's see how they would have vastly improved a bad offense with John Kitna instead of Brady and Warner.
-
No
Many are like this:
http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?s=&am...t&p=1353401
Of course, had you read through the thread, you'd already know that.
Really?----many of them are like the 1000 other discourses of who we might pick in the upcoming draft?
Props to you, Dean.
-
jesus h...
learn to read
oops. My bad.
-
Mike Martz was given the proper players as a head coach and didn't win the superbowl. Nice work Dog, your memory has failed you again. Perhaps you were thinking of another great coach who won it all, like Barry Switzer. Something you should consider when forming a post is proper research.
Actually, and as you were careful to underline, he simply said "coach", which was correct. Regardless, as HC he also took a team to the SB and lost in the biggest upset, at the time since Namath's Jets.
How do you see TO reacting to this new (they weren't so last year) "run first" offense the Bills are going to this season? Do you think he was brought here to open "up the running game"? To block? Do you think he understands this?
If the offense is not going to be centered on TO, TO will begin to ask "why is TO here"? I would ask this question now.
-
When I read statements like this, I remember just how stupid the average fan really is.
EDIT: And then I hear Skip Bayless say ANYTHING, and remember just how stupid the average TV sports commentator really is.
14,000 posts like this?
-
TO "faked a suicide attempt?" Really? And even if he did, was he cited for it? Was Hardy cited for the incident with dear old dad last year?
Your attempts to portray yourself as a Bills fan are failing miserably, Mr. WEO. And if you truly are one, it might be best for your mental health if you find a new favorite team.
Ok maybe it was an actual suicide attempt. Does that make you feel better? Do they "cite" people for maiing fake or maybe half-hearted suicide attempts. You seem to be some sort of legal authority here.
The choice for me would have been easy---give away some picks and a lot of money to lock up Boldin, who is CURRENTLY one of the top WRs in the league, for years to come.........or spend $6.5 million to get a aging star, for one year (!?) who will challenge everyone on the team if he doesn't become the star of a passing offense immediately. Hmmmmm. I guess if I criticize the choice the great Russ Brandon made------I must hate the Bills!!!!
That's a great point. And well argued.
Relax VOR. I assure you I am a Bills fan, just as you say you are. I'm just not a fool.
-
Do you watch football? I mean how can you pin a teams record on just the QB? That is just absurd...
Let me ask you this...do you think Drew Brees is a top QB? What was his record last year? Case closed...
FYI: Our D (Greer in one game and Mithchell in another), and ST gave Trent 3 of his wins last year and were factors in others...Cutler didnt get any such help...
So now Drew Brees is also not a top QB?
And you ask "do you watch football"??
Wow. This is AWESOME stuff!!! Has this place always been like this?
-
What would happen if the Bills simply hold him to his current contract?
-
LOL! So says the guy who claims that no one having seen Lynch drink is moot, because, well, he was obviously impaired and somehow got that way. You don't need no stinkin' evidence, just what you believe! Then you ignore that the actual videotape footage showed the distractions that were mentioned and how car proceeded after hitting the vic as if nothing ever happened. I guess that was pure luck, right? And Lynch obviously knew the cops were at his house to nail him for hit and run, yet no calls or messages to his agent, lawyer, mother, etc. to ask for advice for hours. Again pure luck.
Are you stupid, a troll, or just so disillusioned after 9 years of missing the playoffs that you're become stupid and troll-like? Because if it's the latter, it's time to find a new team. If it's the former like I suspect...
Maybe if I say it a different way, you will understand. The DA could bring 100 people to declare that they saw him drinking that night, but that is NOT evidence of DUI. If he was not obvioulsy impaired to these these witnesses, then this info is useless for prosecution. Thus, moot. Without a timely blood sample, the DA knows he cannot win a felony hit and run in this case.
Also, how does the fellow bar patron "witness" imbibement of alcohol by a guy who sneaks booze into bars and mixes it with his soda?
And you still cannot articulate exactly what Lynch was protecting himself from if he did not commit a crime. Also, why didn't his passengers cooperate? They had no liability in this case. Why didn't they come forward and simply tell the cops: he wasn't drinking, he didn't see second, obese, slow moving lady in the path of his car in the middle of the street? Why was everyone refusing to cooperate in a simple accident investigation? Tell me.
Yep, I must be "stupid" for pointing this stuff out. Or even questioning the character of such a legendary Buffalo Bill like...........Marshawn Lynch.
But if you want to go on thinking that this young guy was not drinking (at all!) with his new friends showing them a night on the town, then go right on. In fact you probably don't think Lynch was smoking that weed in that car in Cali. Wait...aren't you the guy who demanded that those cops test to see if was weed and then to "check it for DNA"?
Funniest thing I read all year!
-
If the DA can't make the case of DUI, why are you? Why can't you and others like you admit that you're just mad that Lynch did what his lawyer told him to do, and kept quiet? There is no other explanation for you irrationally ignoring the evidence that supports his contention of not knowing he hit her. You have NOTHING except for the silly "he brought his own alcohol into bars in the past" and "he didn't come forward fast enough." Please.
And since you're asking me what I would do if someone walked in my path, I sure as hell would slow down and make an attempt to avoid hitting them, not honk my horn and flash my lights. I also certainly wouldn't have admitted to drinking the night before. If that makes me a bad person, so be it. It's called self-preservation and something most people would do, despite what they claim on a message board or when they're not the ones affected. I have no respect for Stallworth for admitting what he did. Obviously he's your hero.
What Stallworth has admitted to (drinking the night before and seeing the pedestrian but not slowing down) is enough to hang him not only legally, but with the Commish. Lynch's traffic incident is no worse than Stallworth being in the drug program, because both would have needed to be "talked to" by the Commish. Now Lynch has a gun charge and Stallworth killed someone, and both came clean immediately in these latest incidents because they were caught dead-to-rights. But in Lynch's case, no one died, or was even close to dying. So who should get a suspension, and for how long?
Because I am free to make conclusions that the DA can't, genius.
You have no respect for Stallworth admitting what he did? Yet you respect an "innocent" Lynch for refusing to cooperate with a simple investigation? Nice!!
Anyway, Lynch didn't contact his lawyer for several hours after he saw the cops (for some goddawn reason) towing away his SUV out of his driveway. When the cops knock on your door, and you have no idea why, nor do you recall hitting anyone with your SUV at 3 AM after a night of bar-hopping, do you come out and say "hey, why are you impounding my car?" or do you stay inside for a few hours and then contact your lawyer? He knew what was going on.
If he had done nothing wrong, and there was no evidence to the contrary, why would his lawyer tell him not to cooperate in any way? How could he "innocently" incriminate himself? What "evidence" could he have inadvertantly provided for the cops if there is none?
Unlike you, I don't need to believe this guy is an unfortunate victim of coast to coast overzealous police activity while he's "livin' the life". He's an entertainer and if he entertains me on Sunday afternoon, that's enough for me. I don't have to completely suspend disbelief to make the whole fan thing work me.
You're in too deep, bro.
And by the way, when I roll into a neighborhood that is not my own and I got the car with no tags, and I'm smokin a coupla bones---that gun is comin' out!
-
One of the rare instances in which I tend to disagree with you bt.
Imo, fans are seduced bt the fact that Cutler has a very strong arm. After watching RJ and Losman, this facet of quarterback play means less and less to me. Cutler has great fantasy football numbers as well, but his w/l record is not so great, and he played on a good team with a superb coach.
I guess what threw me was the comparison to Kelly. A case could be made that Kelly played his entire career on an "inept franchise." After all the injuries, Kelly had less tools than Cutler, but Kelly was a winner.
I think that what turned me off to Cutler the most was his comment about having a better arm than Elway. Even if it were true (and perhaps he does have a stronger arm wrt 1 or 2 types of throws), it was so over the top idiotic that it stunned me. Maybe Cutler has a longer deep out (not so sure), but Elway threw 50 yard passes accross the field with no air under the ball, and on the run to boot. He was a baseball center fielder, and could throw 40 yard fastballs with ease.
Either way, it showed me that Cutler was either crazy or very dumb. It would be like A-Roid telling us that he is stronger than Mickey Mantle, a New York legend and hero. If he goes to the jests, I will be less worried than many posters. They are snakebitten and their coach, while he sounds like a cool guy, hasn't proven a damn thing.
In summary, I don't blame the coach for trying to get rid of him. I'm not all that impressed either.
This is silly. These arguments are getting dumber and dumber.
RJ and Losman would have to combine their best seasons to have a better output than Cutler last year. The guy had NO defense--they gave up 6000 yards and 448 points!! He put up big numbers by throwing the ball---that's what he's paid to do! Who would knock a guy for last season? The same guys on this site who would be RAVING if JP or Edwards ever produced like this.
You want "stunning"? How about your claim that Kelly played with less "tools" than Cutler did last year? Come on---how can a Bills fan much such a careless statement?
McDaniels is a boob----like every other BB exPat to leave the nest (Romeo, Weis, Mangina.....). It is mind-blowing that Bowen paid $15 million to fire Shanahan so he could pick up this kid.
-
Cutler had much better talent around him. He has a great #1, a legit #2, and a very good pass catching TE. Not to mention his numbers are extremely inflated since he throws the ball near 40 times a game.
Would anyone argue that the Broncos would have won more games if they went more with their talentless running game. What are "inflated numbers"? I see that a lot on this board. You make it sound like a deficit. I would have enjoyed a few seasons of "inflated" QB "numbers" on this team the past 5 years or so. Wouldn't you?
-
So we suspect Lynch was DUI because...he brought his own alcohol into bars in the past and he refused to make the police's case for them? LOL, got it! Talk about moot points. Fortunately our legal system doesn't take such dreck into account and requires evidence like people seeing him drinking right before the accident, or the videotape of the incident showing him slowing down or hastily leaving because he realized he hit someone, or calling someone right after it happened to get advice on what to do next.
I suggest you accept the fact that the DA could find NOTHING to suggest he was even drinking that night and that it was "just a (not so) terrible accident."
Just because you don't understand it, or refuse to accept it, doesn't mean it makes no sense. But to clarify it for you, since he was in the substance abuse program, obviously Goodell "talked to him" about being a good representative for the NFL, kind of like he would have done with Lynch after last year's traffic ticket. And killing someone, even if it's "a terrible accident" (the hypocrisy of this statement is too rich!) is still a black mark on the league. But hey, good on Stallworth for admitting he killed the person, was drinking until midnight, and honked his horn to get the victim to move out of his way.
Again, a DA cannot make a case of DUI if he cannot prove the guy was drunk. Just because he not seen stumbling out of a bar does not mean he wasn't impaired. And of course a guy who is guilty of a crime is not going to "make the police's case for them"!! Thanks for restating my point.
An innocent guy with nothing to hide doesn't need to hinder or "not help" the DA make a case against him. Get it?
As for the terrible accident--if someone walks in your path and you hit them and kill them (through no fault of your own) would you expect to be punished, by anyone, just because you had a past history of substance abuse? Of course not, and neither does our legal system, nor does the Commish, I bet.
I'm also betting that the Commish is more skeptical of Lynch's story than a "my guy can do no wrong" homer such as those found here.
-
It has been amusing but like anything else it's becoming repetitive. Mr. Weo is like alot of us and likes to argue. I don't believe for a second he actually believes Martz would work in Buffalo. While his comparison to Shanahan was cute, he just brings up one off topic point after another. Bottom line is that Martz hasn't seen consistent success since 01. He has been given multiple chances since then and failed. In addition to failing since 01 he has burned bridge after bridge with his poor attitude. Those juggernaut Ram teams were loaded with talent. Every star member of the old Rams team has had big seasons without Martz, unfortunately Martz hasn't had one without them.
Sure we all like to argue. One off topic after another? If you say so!
He's been given multiple chances and failed?? Are there two worse teams he could have been summoned to? He was brought to those teams to do exactly as he was asked to---and did. He vastly improved those offenses with the few tools he was given. If none of you can acknowledge that chicken soup out of chicken sh**t in Detroit and SF, than I won't push further. The facts are as they are. I can't argue with your feelings or "observations".
If you are going to argue that DJ has not "been given multiples chances...and failed" and that the duo of DJ and Schonert are exactly what this team needs, than....bless you, I guess.
Derek Fine...
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
This is true. "Gets tossed aside by linebackers". Ouch.
Fine vs. Schoumman---that's a tough hair to split.