Magox

That's probably because you're an old coot.

yeah, like that lol

He sometimes annoys me the same way Chris Christie does... Christie needs to win re election in the blue state of NJ and has an ego larger than his physical stature, much the same way Scarborough is, they both have outsized egos who go waaaay out of their way to criticize the party they support just so that they can be liked from those in the middle. It's a show.

Of course it was a typo, I was quoting his comment

That's cool... That's your view and you're entitled to it... However That statement still stands

Actually, that's not what you were implying. you responded to KD about this part of his post Then you responded with this \ In other words, you were saying that one is more acceptable than the other. Right?

It does, personally, I just believe you are internally coping with gays having a larger voice than they use to. I may be wrong, and it's not meant to be offensive, that's just what I believe.

If I were to accept the premise of your argument, than that would also mean that I also accept that homosexual activity shouldn't occur. Your argument is that one is more "acceptable" than the other. That doesn't make sense, it's either acceptable or not. The idea of treating one sect of the society with a different set of rules than another is discriminatory.

Not that it's a big deal, but actually, I don't see the explanation of "rooting for gays"

Sorry, but "gentleman" is plural and considering that only 3rd and I posted, that would have to include me, ya nitwit

And you gathered that out of Over analyzing called up, says he wants his interpretive investigative results back

You take yourself too seriously

Reality is that Scarborough IS truly a conservative. Deep down, he cringes when he hears liberals espouse their left views, however he is an anti war guy (in the lines of Pat Buchannan) who does have "moderate" social views. He doesn't support tax increases and is a small government conservative. If he was one of today's politicians, he'd be a tea party candidate. He just happens to work for MSNBC, and it is after all his job, you know, to get ratings. He appeases those to the left just enough to keep them tuned in, and talks about the Debt and Deficit enough to keep conservatives tuned in.

I still want to know why we're rooting for gays?

Ever since the elections, Politico has had a field day with writing up pieces about internal division with the GOP. lol

I agree, but how do you sell that? I'll tell you how, you don't.

ACA will prove to be a disaster

I agree with this concept for just about all health care. But I believe with the nation of fat asses we have, it's gonna take an organic approach that entails healthier living to compliment a better delivery system of how we administer medicine.

Rising health care costs are the main driver. But certainly isn't the only issue.

I've rooted for many teams and people, but not sure I ever rooted for the gays.

exit poll data

Look at the 2010 Census, that would be the most accurate data.

That's the least he could of said.

The more I keep thinking about this Cliff Bill, it actually is a very conservative Bill. It was a bill that permanently lowered taxes for the vast majority of the population. If anything, this bill builds on to George Bush's legacy.

Well yeah, they typically vote for Conservatives because of Castro. However, the children of many of these people who fled Cuba don't relate to the experiences their parents have had. They have become Americanized, living in urban areas such as Miami, and they relate socially much more with D's than R's.