All_Pro_Bills

The American neo-liberal movement driven by intellectuals and academics armed with studies conducted in like-minded echo chambers always proving their points along with advanced degrees and credidentials hate populists and ordinary people. So called MAGA. Mainly because even at their lower and limited intelligence they're still smart enough to sniff out and ridicule the horseshit ideas of their intellectual superiors.

If I'm that coach, next time they play that team get a bigger and nastier fake lady and kick the crap out of the he/she. Message sent.

What I'd like to hear from insane Democratic leadership supporting this invasion is the number they're shooting for here? 10 million a year forever? 20, 30, a billion in total? What's their no vacancy number? How many people do they want to pile into the country?

Trump doing this will take the issue off the table so all too predictable plan democrats will reaort to is to drill home the contention he's lying and once elected will go back to the total ban assertion. Count on it.

Border security, crime, the economy poll as the top issues for voters in 2024. Abortion, not so much so expect no fortuitous repeat caused by 2022 summer time SCOTUS ruling for the democrats in 2024.

How exactly are you and the other big talkers here standing up to Putin? By mis-gendering him?

So is your common sense.

Put on your thinking cap. The story has no idealogical overtones. The NYT published the story on the CIA's involvement in Ukraine because the CIA wanted the Times to print the article. No cries or demands to identify the leaker of vital national security info is an obvious clue. The writers are also known agency errand boys. The question is why at this point in time does the CIA want the public to know about their involvement? Is it a precursor to some abrupt change in direction? A CYA action to place blame on previous managers, or something else? Perhaps a peace deal without US involvement brokered by the Saudis between Putin and Zelensky thst both have had hi-level contact with MBS recently? One rumor out there now.

Seems like progressives don't care about the murders of Americans anywhere they happen unless doing so supports their politics.

Biden said the invasion will continue until all 8 billion people that could find a better life in America cross the Rio Grande.

Get me this John Oliver's contact info. Clarence might not take his offer but I will.

So what's bothering you today? A great man once said "the truth will set you free". The CIA's involved. Surprise, surprise.

The political system runs on bullsheet and being such only the least amount of truth to keep it running is revealed. To inform the public would result in the elimination of all speculation.

I'll bet my last penny if there was a shred of evidence to prove any wrong doing this Garland led DOJ would be all over it. Am I wrong? That's pretty much all there is to say about it.

Some that are chummy with the rule enforcers just get the rules bent in their favor.

The system doesn't like to be challenged so expect some Federal goon squad to pay Tarik a visit while others perform some character assassination, and yet others in lawfare work to identify some obscure or distant event to charge him with some "crime".

Democrats are anxiously awaiting the next primary disqualification ruling from Judge Steve Harvey.

How's the name Lindsay Graham fit the requirement of maintaining the uni-party's control over Washington?

When all your cases suck ass because they're pathetically weak and based on the flimsiest of legal arguments in history it's the best you' can expect.

So you think all of these legal actions against Trump are completely independent of each other and examples of connections such as visitor and meeting logs documenting occurrences of GA DA office personnel meeting with WH personnel are mere coincidence? What do you think they discussed? Exchanging cookie recipes!

Based on Rachel's argument if the court ruled lifetime immunity exists then what checks and balances would exist to keep Joe Biden from remaining in the White House if he loses the election in November and committing all the crimes he wants to commit without any worry about the consequences? This is more whipping up the crowd nonsense. SCOTUS is not going to rule Presidents have immunity for life. They'll issue a narrow ruling specific to the specific case before the court. But certainly no blanket ruling. If it favors Trump activist journalists like Rachel will say the court is filled with political bias and if its against Trump how they overcame pressure from Republicans to arrive at the "correct" decision.

It is a conspiracy. Its obvious the democrats are going to an unprecedented effort that stretches the boundaries of ethics and legality by coordinating legal actions through many court battles while running a full court press to keep Trump from returning to the White House.

Looks like the next hot spot is Maldova. For anyone not familiar with the place it's a slice of real estate between Romania and Ukraine. 220K Russian citizens reside in the province of Transnistria. The plot here is a familiar story. Post-Soviet era map. Get set to for everyone to change their Twitter flag pins with the admintration looking for billions in aid for our latest strategic allie nobody's heard of.

Swallow the fantasy world and insanity of the left where objective and critical thinking skills are viewed as dangerous and counter to the "values" of inclusiveness and diversity.

If you'd like. I should add I didn't vote for Trump in 2016 or 2020. But I think the democratic socialist left kooks are just as dangerous because they believe "rights" are mere "privileges" granted by the ultimate power which is "The State".