All_Pro_Bills

The whole thing was fake. Just like her new personality. What candidate that claims to be qualified to be President is afraid to take unscripted questions from American citizens? Harris, thats's who. They're trying to pull off the big lie here. She's just not qualified to serve and if Democrats did their due diligence instead of letting the rich donors and special interests running the DNC make a mockery of the selection process they'd have chosen somebody else. Trump for all his faults is a better choice but TDS victims and never Trumpers would support a crash dummy. And they are.

The majority of these cases never made it to court for a fair hearing on the merits of the evidence. DNC paid legal teams fought every challenge and the majority were dismissed on procedural grounds or because of "process" issues. And not for a lack of evidence. This time the cheaters won't have the element of surprise in their favor.

If Trump prevails you guys can dial 988 Or click here: https://www.nami.org/Advocacy/Policy-Priorities/Responding-to-Crises/National-Hotline-for-Mental-Health-Crises-and-Suicide-Prevention/

Based on the Peter Principal it appears Kamala peaked 40 years ago.

The last thing the party leadership and billionaire donors wanted was to put somebody into the presidency that had the personal strength and vision to bring ideas and positions to a new administration that conflicted with the party's agenda. So they took a crash dummy VP they can control and created a marketing campaign around the idea she brings "change" with a high level of competency. The party faithful bought into the hustle while nobody seems to ask how an incumbent party VP can campaign on change while saying she wouldn't change anything about the Biden administration. So 4 more years of the same instead? Given high levels of dissatisfaction with certain polices that wouldn't sell well to the all important independent vote. So lie instead.

Everything about Harris is staged, scripted, controlled. Are you capable of comprehending this?

That's why it's so easy to get all these funding initiatives through without much pushback. If they said we're raising your taxes by 400 million to pay for this it might receive a different response. But for "free"? Sure let's fund everything. Donate billions to end "cat juggling" in Mexico too.

Your message is approved by government censors. It is not false. If prices of some goods rise then you can purchase a smaller amount of goods and services absent any increase in income or money supply. If there are 2 goods in the economy A and B and both cost 10 units of currency and your income is 100 units of currency you can buy a quantity of A and B equal to a quantity of 10 items. If the price of A goes from 10 to 20 and the price of B remains at 10 you can now only buy 5 units of A or 10 units of B. Or some combination equal to 100 units of currency. Your faced with a choice of cutting your consumption of A or B or both. This is what Americans are experiencing especially lower and fixed income consumers. The only way you can maintain the same level of consumption is to increase income or money supply.

It doesn't work that way. Overall prices can't rise absent an increase in the money supply. And in the case of our economy, massive government spending. Borrowing trillions against the future. That's the mistake economists and policy makers always make regardless of which party is in charge or who is running the Fed. If you want to stop or lower inflation, stop printing money and increasing the money supply. Why it doesn't happen is nobody wants to impose or experience the downside of controlling inflation.

If you really want to punish them, instead of deportation send them to Cleveland and force them to convert to Browns fans! I understand when given a choice between this and the electric chair, death row inmates choose the chair.

All those people promising to move to Canada if Trump wins but didn't follow through with their "threat" in 2016. And of course, Jets fans.

Along with this our colleges and universities are producing millions of degreed professionals armed with degrees in useless disciplines without any hard and marketable skills while being crushed by thousands in debt. Which in turn results in the need for businesses to import engineers scientists, medical professionals, researchers, and computer science grads.

I'm speculating they would utilize more recent technology and tactics such as drone swarms and missiles. I'd cite our inability to control Houthi attacks on shipping whether due to our lack of commitment or some other factors as motivation for them to believe they could achieve some degree of success.

Something else to consider is that in response to an attack, even limited to Iranian nuclear sites with many underground and hard to damage, they could respond by acting to shut down tanker traffic through the Straits of Hormuz. Sure we would respond with force to keep it open. But about 30% of oil goes through that chockepoint and carriers along with insurers will be cautious about exposing their ships to damage. That would raise world prices without damaging Iran's facilities and impact supply.

Quid pro quo. We interfere in their affairs too. Don't you think? The Russians conclude the US wants regime change in Russia to replace their current government with one obedient to Washington so they can steal all their resources. Sounds kind of like the other side of the coin of the stories your party peddles. Doesn't it?

They all have one thing in common. A centralization and concentration of power in a single place. A person, a political party, some ethnic or social group. And to the average person with the boot of government on their neck it all looks the same. You avoid any of these isms by eliminating or de-centralizing power and decision making.

Not for lack of effort from democrats but the abortion issue doesn't appear to be giving them a lot of traction like it generated in the 2022 mid-terms. People have more immediate concerns as major issues and they poll badly on those.

And don't make any dumb coaching or play calling decisions to beat yourself like the Seahawks throwing from the 1 instead of handing it off to Lynch, who was destroying the Pat's defense at the end. The Giants also had a bit of good fortune with the incredible Manning to Tyre play. So a little luck helps too.

Yeah, she was doing so well that her handlers at the studio frantically tried to cut the interview short.

I'm starting to think he's going to win by a pretty substantial electoral vote margin. In horse racing parlance, it looks like the Harris campaign is "fading in the stretch".

In typical Jets fashion it shouldn't be a surprise for fans to celebrate the arrival of Adams and then lose their QB for the several games or maybe even the season on Sunday night. My bet is in the 2nd quarter.

Hopefully, OC Brady and QB Allen will have some say on how much and when Cooper is used on Sunday. For starters, I can think of some Red Zone opportunities that could play out with both Coleman and Cooper where Allen just puts the ball out there to the open guy and he just goes up to get it.

I'm not sure if this has been mentioned but we need to consider there were other suitors for Cooper and the Bills might have had to sweeten the offer to make the deal happen. Also, consider this trade keeps Cooper out of the hands of other teams looking for receiver help, like the Chiefs. Imagine the moaning and groaning if we found out the Chiefs outbid us because Beane wouldn't swap a 6 for a 7. Fans are already upset with the draft trade-back that landed Mahomes a speedy WR in Worthy. This was an excellent move. What would we rather have? A better shot this season at the Super Bowl and a parade in February or an exciting day 2 of the draft in late April 2025 to see who the Bills pick in the 3rd round.

You must be living in some alternative Universe. Your cult of chaos makes all these unsupported outlandish accusations. And hopes they somehow stick with the uninformed. But ignore that its the Democrats that have stated "Trump cannot be allowed to win". What does that mean? Cannot be allowed? Is there any limit to what they'll do to insure he cannot win? Cheat, lie, murder, what's the limit? Apparently there is no limit. As an example, House Representative Raskin has stated he'll refuse to certify a Trump victory claiming more or less that if Trump wins that by definition means he cheated. So without a shred of evidence or any votes counted he's ready to declare the election invalid. But only if Trump wins. No concerns about democracy here. And of course if Harris wins he expects the opposition to certify the election and go along with the results without challenge or objection. The guy's a major A hole. There are many other examples of this "saving democracy" hustle. What it really means is we win. Trying to save democracy by refusing to certify the will of the voters. Saving democracy, that will be a punchline for jokes for decades to come. Add to it the democrats have 100's of lawyers ready and waiting to challenge every result in every State along with already challenging any attempt to secure the integrity of the election. Imagine the audacity of anyone that attempts to insure election integrity by eliminating the potential for ineligible non-citizens to vote? How dare they. Its a certainty their storm troopers will flock to the streets to loot, burn, and riot if they don't get their way. You can't seem to see your the Nazis! Your the threat to democracy. And more to the point the freedoms and rights of American citizens. Have you ever heard a single democrat say the word "freedom"? To them the concept doesn't appear to exist.

Bill said Americans aren't having enough babies to keep up the population. That's justification to import people. But the candidates of his party's number one issue is running on a pledge to defend abortion "rights". Which is counterintuitive to the need for more children. Add in promises to raise the child tax credit. But for who? Foreigners? Because Americans aren't having children and therefore don't qualify for the tax credit. If more abortions is their goal shouldn't they be offering a tax credit not to have children? Very confusing.