Jump to content

All_Pro_Bills

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,969
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by All_Pro_Bills

  1. What American politicians and media figures do you trust?
  2. A politician faking his identity and qualifications, and then admitting he lied! Being honest about lying, that's a first. I thought the lefties sensing the potential to recover a lost seat were good with everybody being allowed to pretend to be whatever they think they are. If this guy identifies with being Jewish shouldn't this be treated with equity and be just as good as a dude that thinks he's a woman? I mean really, you need to embrace the concept. LMAO here.
  3. I've explained what I mean as clearly as possible.
  4. The left isn't at war with the right as much as they're at war with reality and reason with a desire to replace those things with feelings and emotions is what I've seen it described as elsewhere.
  5. I think the US goal is simple. To maintain the uni-polar world order where the US calls the shots and makes the rules, and everybody follows those rules. Threats to that order need to be addressed economically, politically, and if necessary, through military force. Major threats to that order being Russia, China, Iran to name a few. Ukraine provides an opportunity to address one of those threats via a proxy country doing the fighting while our leaders play the democracy card in order to solicit domestic support for the program without informing an American public mostly oblivious to this Imperial arrangement of the true motivation. I think that's it.
  6. Liz Chaney was a bit of a puzzle. While she clearly had it out for Trump she did so while alienating herself from a large percentage of Republican voters as evidenced by her huge primary loss in 2022. And while Democrats across the party praised her for taking a stand against Orange Man and the MAGA segment of the party it's a certainty that absolutely none of those Democrats carrying her off the field on their shoulders would cast a vote for Liz against any Democratic candidate in any general election at any level. She played the part of hero well and sacrificed her short-term political ambitions to carry the torch for the establishment Republicans and Democrats against the upstart "populists" that threatened to interrupt the stranglehold they collectively hold on wielding power and control in Washington for some yet to be revealed reward. I say this with 100% certainty given that no contemporary American political would willingly sacrifice their personal ambition for the "good" of the country unless they profited in some way too. Agree or not no Washington insider is going to be the guy falling on the hand grenade in the fox hole to save their fellow soldiers.
  7. And other than the goal to feminize men what is the Democrats plan for America?
  8. Just plain old UGLY whether man or women or something else. Tell me that's misinformation!
  9. A trick previously perfected by the Clintons. The difference is you conjure up some fantasy attacking a political movement without evidence of any kind to make a preposterous claim while the Clintons legacy is littered with a documented trail of bodies from Arkansas to Washington.
  10. Good point. And Miami signs Chubb to a big deal. Guess the moral is impulse buying can be expensive.
  11. If the Broncos are in the mood to fire people, they might want to fully evaluate their GM and front office too. They got fleeced by the Seahawks in the trade for what looks like a washed-up Russel Wilson this season and saddled with a big cap-hitting contract with lots of term. A trade which will likely provide the Seahawks with a potential top 3 pick for a team that is going to be shopping for a replacement franchise QB. Well done, Seattle.
  12. I think it's more like sticking to the play call as much as possible and when improvising and going off-script is necessary being smart with the ball.
  13. If the injury report isn't intended to help Vegas set the line more accurately call me surprised.
  14. And explain please how your question is relevant in any way to my comment?
  15. Great assessment and appreciate you sharing your experiences and insights. I'd summarize my feedback by saying that while we tend to highlight technology as the almighty factor it ultimately comes down to competent, motivated, well trained people with critical thinking skills that make the difference.
  16. Some people choose to pass judgment based on the actor and not the act. Like a romantic partner might judge their lover's actions, Obama could do no wrong, so he gets a pass on everything regardless of the act while Trump can do nothing right, so he doesn't. I'd call it a lack of objectivity and I should add, emotion rather than logic and reasoning.
  17. In short, an abuse of power where they investigate a targeted person, attempt to build a case, take "evidence" and assemble it in search of a crime rather than the traditional law enforcement practices and procedures of investigating a crime, gathering and analyzing evidence, looking for suspects and motive, and identifying the perpetrator.
  18. Nuclear threat aside, do you think we're being sold an overblown mis-representation of the actual conventional threat the Russia miliary poses? Given their performance in Ukraine to date, I don't think anybody should lose any sleep over worrying about Russia invading western Europe for one. The image NATO and the Pentagon paint is the risk of something akin German blitzkrieg of 1930-1940 of Europe. Given observable actions, that appears to be a fantasy.
  19. I suspect that a review of Mr. Epps' 2020 Personal Income tax filing 1040 to the IRS that shows a 2020 W2 addressed to Raymond Epps from the "FBI, PO Box 0109, Washington DC should confirm his involvement. But sadly, we'll never find out because we know the IRS and also Congress do not support the release income tax filings of American citizens because they value privacy and the law.
  20. Generally ascending to power by making either false promises or something for nothing arrangements that turn into a deal with The Devil. But your point that freedom requires vigilance and effort rings true. And beware of "leaders" offering help and a free ride.
  21. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how the morons and simpletons can still believe a group of mostly over-50, out of shape, unorganized and unarmed yokels were going to take over the Capitol, declare their "leader" President, hold the building against assault and siege by heavily armed superior law enforcement and military personnel, force Congress to certify the election in their favor, and biggest of all, force the world's most powerful military fighting force into unconditional surrender while magically taking over all government facilities and organizations everywhere in the country to neutralize any opposition to their "insurrection" plan. Dismiss the idea a thinking person might expect, that such a coup would require actions in 100's of places simultaneously but the idea they were going to pull it off by occupying a single building shows the genius of this plan. I eagerly await the coming premiere of the movie. I'm thinking Meryl Streep as Liz Chaney sounds like a sure thing for best actress. The entire escapade, a fun filled drama of comedy and laughter for the whole family. The J6 Committee would like to extend a Merry Christmas to everyone but our friends at the Center for Diversity have reminded me the censors will not allow the use of the term Christmas. But in the spirit of saying to hell with the PC police, Merry Christmas Bills fans.
  22. Sure, the FBI comments on open investigations. What do you call Comey's admitted leaks to buddies at the NY Times? And parading out in the media of photos of documents taken from Trump's residence? Garland's showboating news conference where he demanded nobody dare question their actions said they needed to act with urgency but left us hanging by never explaining why. They do indeed comment, when it suits their needs to among other things grease the wheels of public opinion.
  23. The censorship angle aside, why did the FBI knowing the contents of the laptop represented genuine correspondence and files documenting the actions of an enterprise of the Biden family and friends, detailed evidence of potential illegal and unethical arrangements between the Biden family enterprise and foreign actors, just decide to sit on the evidence? Lock it up in the evidence locker and forget it. And still to this day have taken no serious investigate action or referred anything to DOJ? In the face of what is clearly a potential national security risk and perhaps a compromised commander-in-chief. How can anyone conclude otherwise then specific agents and official in the bureau are running an off-the-books protection operation for the President? And to boot a protection racket run under the nose of the previous administration and AG.
  24. Next time you need to turn off the water or natgas at home ask yourself what is easier. Go to the basement or utility room and turn the value to the full closed position or go outside, find the line into the house, and blow up the pipe? Find me anyone that believes the Russians blew up their own pipeline and I'll show you an idiot that will believe anything. The US or some proxy blew it up to eliminate the ability of Germany to make any kind of independent energy deal. Like when Cortez burned the Spanish ships when reaching the New World, there will be no going back.
×
×
  • Create New...