SwampD

I really doubt there are any fans that think it is ok. I'm just not ready to impose Martial Law and an 8PM curfew for two days following a Bills loss. Again...spray paint.

The Bills have been making a mess on Erie County's lawn for 9 years now. Call it payback.

Let's hope they spray painted "Just hold on to the ball" He won't forget that. I get a kick out of all this false indignation. Reminds me of when Peters was "assaulted" with a plastic cup last year.

I still think that I would choose almost getting burned while blitzing, over getting burned while not...twice.

If caring enough to post on a message board after 9 years of a sub-standard team isn't proof enough that we are real fan's, then we'll never be good enough for you.

Yep. I'm not sure if there was one blitz in the last five minutes either. Tom was at his shakiest when there was someone near his knee. EDIT: I think this is the same reason we lost the Dallas MNG as well.

I'd rather have the Bills get beat, but have the final score say they won.

Shoulda woulda coulda,... didn't. Until they learn how to win those games, all they've shown me is that still know how to lose them.

They lost. That's all there is to say. Until they win, they're losers

What happened to #4?

This is ridiculous. I'm no fan fan of his either but c'mon. He was saying something self deprecating to try and be funny and it sounds weird 25 years later.

2009 Buffalo Bills : Still Beats Going to Church

Bill's the only one who got caught...TWICE.

I agree on both. While I don't agree with how people responded to him, I would think that someone who wants to bear the title-"National Sports Reporter" would have a thicker skin. I personally find nasty posters very easy to ignore.

The O-line is worse this year(maybe), but we added TO...push. The defense is the same as last year, but added Maybin and Schobel...advantage - '09 I personally think the team is better this year that last. But with a tougher schedule, I fear the dreaded 7-9.

All true. But that's not how the game ended and that's what the fans remember. When JP fumbles against the Jets, and we go from winner to losers, that's what we remember. When Trent throws 3 INTs in the first half against Cleveland, we remember that we missed a field goal to win it and Jauron should have tried to get closer. I don't really have a dog in this fight. I think they both have(or had) talent, but our coaching was not capable of bringing it out. I'm just trying to give a reason why we view the two QBs differently.

They may be equal ratio-wise, but (and I'm just going from what my memory is telling me) not point-in-the-game wise. The big games that Trent lost, the last plays were missed field goals(Dallas, Denver, Cleveland,..). The big games JP lost ended with him just making bad decisions, putting the final nail in the coffin. Again, it might be false, but this is how I remember it.

I think it's because JP's mistakes usually resulted in turnovers, where Trent's mistakes just turn into punts(or field goals). Not sure which is worse.

Yep!

Not to defend anyone, but I think you have a better chance of improving if you are 2-14 than you do if you end the season 7-9. You get much better picks, not just in the first round but every round.

This worked for Miami last year. http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/id/...s-sorry-for-you

I missed the Harris play, but Stupar definitely looked good. I saw him later in the game. Did he play against Chicago's starters at all?

ghey.