RLflutie7 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm not impressed with the starting QB or RB for the Bills. Edwards lacks arm strength and Lynch runs into traffic too much and he can't seem to break tackles as well as advertised. Taking the USC QB Sanchez wouldn't be too bad and I'm thinking the Kansas State QB Josh Freeman wouldn't be so bad either. I'm not that impressed with the crop of running backs but I'm sure the Bills can find and effective runner. I'd take Moreno even though he seems a smallish 217. Wells is heavy at 235 put he's worth a look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarence H. Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm not impressed with the starting QB or RB for the Bills. Edwards lacks arm strength and Lynch runs into traffic too much and he can't seem to break tackles as well as advertised. Taking the USC QB Sanchez wouldn't be too bad and I'm thinking the Kansas State QB Josh Freeman wouldn't be so bad either. I'm not that impressed with the crop of running backs but I'm sure the Bills can find and effective runner. I'd take Moreno even though he seems a smallish 217. Wells is heavy at 235 put he's worth a look. QB is not in picture until day 2. As for RB they are a dime a dozen. The league is full of serviceable RB's; the FB life expectancy is short and all teams utilize more than one back. We are fine with Lynch-Jackson_Rhode-Oman stable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deep2evans Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm gunna go ahead and assume this is a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM57 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm not impressed with the starting QB or RB for the Bills. Edwards lacks arm strength and Lynch runs into traffic too much and he can't seem to break tackles as well as advertised. Taking the USC QB Sanchez wouldn't be too bad and I'm thinking the Kansas State QB Josh Freeman wouldn't be so bad either. I'm not that impressed with the crop of running backs but I'm sure the Bills can find and effective runner. I'd take Moreno even though he seems a smallish 217. Wells is heavy at 235 put he's worth a look. ....have you ever watched Freeman play? He's a developmental QB if there ever was one. See: Russell, JaMarcus. NO. THANK. YOU. We have players at QB (Edwards) and RB (Lynch, Rhodes, Jackson) more than capable of being starters at the NFL level. Let's fix those positions where we DON'T have quality starters (like Keith Ellison) first before we start making luxury picks, yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM57 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Also, don't drink the bong water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLflutie7 Posted April 25, 2009 Author Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm gunna go ahead and assume this is a joke. No it's not. The Bills need RB and QB. Lynch is overrated. He can't seem to avoid contact enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm gunna go ahead and assume this is a joke. Oh it's a joke alright. It's just a question of whether it's intentional or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robkmil Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm not impressed with the starting QB or RB for the Bills. Edwards lacks arm strength and Lynch runs into traffic too much and he can't seem to break tackles as well as advertised. Taking the USC QB Sanchez wouldn't be too bad and I'm thinking the Kansas State QB Josh Freeman wouldn't be so bad either. I'm not that impressed with the crop of running backs but I'm sure the Bills can find and effective runner. I'd take Moreno even though he seems a smallish 217. Wells is heavy at 235 put he's worth a look. yeah lets start all over, we have no other holes except these two positions every year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLflutie7 Posted April 25, 2009 Author Share Posted April 25, 2009 ....have you ever watched Freeman play? He's a developmental QB if there ever was one. See: Russell, JaMarcus. NO. THANK. YOU. We have players at QB (Edwards) and RB (Lynch, Rhodes, Jackson) more than capable of being starters at the NFL level. Let's fix those positions where we DON'T have quality starters (like Keith Ellison) first before we start making luxury picks, yes? What you are saying "more than capable of being starters at the NFL level" is like a Bronco fan saying Chris Simms is the real deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Oh it's a joke alright. It's just a question of whether it's intentional or not. More likely a homage to everyone's favorite expensive car owner... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WordByrd Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 No it's not. The Bills need RB and QB. Lynch is overrated. He can't seem to avoid contact enough. This guy is a genius! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm... an idiot troll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
el Tigre Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I think we're good at RB. But I'm not sold on Edwards. If Sanchez was there at 11 I'd take him. Won't happen tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 The Bills also need another CB. And punter. Yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm not impressed with the starting QB or RB for the Bills. Edwards lacks arm strength and Lynch runs into traffic too much and he can't seem to break tackles as well as advertised. Taking the USC QB Sanchez wouldn't be too bad and I'm thinking the Kansas State QB Josh Freeman wouldn't be so bad either. I'm not that impressed with the crop of running backs but I'm sure the Bills can find and effective runner. I'd take Moreno even though he seems a smallish 217. Wells is heavy at 235 put he's worth a look. PUNCH!! QB is not in picture until day 2. As for RB they are a dime a dozen. The league is full of serviceable RB's; the FB life expectancy is short and all teams utilize more than one back. We are fine with Lynch-Jackson_Rhode-Oman stable. Even though he's a troll I still had to PUNCH!! him. Amazingly, I agree with Beerball. This guy's a troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I think we're good at RB. But I'm not sold on Edwards. If Sanchez was there at 11 I'd take him. Won't happen tho. PUNCH!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphadawg7 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I think we're good at RB. But I'm not sold on Edwards. If Sanchez was there at 11 I'd take him. Won't happen tho. We are fine at RB...but if Sancez is there at #11 I wouldnt mind seeing us take him there. I wathced him play all year at USC, and I really think he will be the best QB to come out of this class. I am not totally sold on him only because of his limited body of work to really evaluate him, but he throws a great ball. Even if you dont want Sanchez, taking him at #11 if he is there would be great because we could keep him or turn around and trade him like SD did with Manning when they traded him for a bounty 3 picks later at #4 to NY for Rivers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLflutie7 Posted April 25, 2009 Author Share Posted April 25, 2009 We are fine at RB...but if Sancez is there at #11 I wouldnt mind seeing us take him there. I wathced him play all year at USC, and I really think he will be the best QB to come out of this class. I am not totally sold on him only because of his limited body of work to really evaluate him, but he throws a great ball. Even if you dont want Sanchez, taking him at #11 if he is there would be great because we could keep him or turn around and trade him like SD did with Manning when they traded him for a bounty 3 picks later at #4 to NY for Rivers... Couldn't agree more. There's always that option of trading him if the Bills are still sold on Edwards. I don't think Denver will pass up on him. I've seen many different things, including Denver taking a RB. I don't want Denver taking a RB that early, maybe later. And I'd welcome Sanchez to the fold in Denver. It's Denver's glaring need. But they could go defense too. They need it bad. I'd prefer the QB. Bottom line, it's anybody's guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanuts Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I'm not impressed with the starting QB or RB for the Bills. Edwards lacks arm strength and Lynch runs into traffic too much and he can't seem to break tackles as well as advertised. Taking the USC QB Sanchez wouldn't be too bad and I'm thinking the Kansas State QB Josh Freeman wouldn't be so bad either. I'm not that impressed with the crop of running backs but I'm sure the Bills can find and effective runner. I'd take Moreno even though he seems a smallish 217. Wells is heavy at 235 put he's worth a look. I would look at Athone SMith FSU, he is small but strong & Fast. He was Mr. Football in the State of Florida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanuts Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 We are fine at RB...but if Sancez is there at #11 I wouldnt mind seeing us take him there. I wathced him play all year at USC, and I really think he will be the best QB to come out of this class. I am not totally sold on him only because of his limited body of work to really evaluate him, but he throws a great ball. Even if you dont want Sanchez, taking him at #11 if he is there would be great because we could keep him or turn around and trade him like SD did with Manning when they traded him for a bounty 3 picks later at #4 to NY for Rivers... You are right this would be a way to get more picks. Great call. I support your approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts