WWVaBeach Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 Nope! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 Wow! I could feel myself getting angry reading that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGimp Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 When will "real" people step up and start a revolt in this country? Why do we take it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wooderson Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 When will "real" people step up and start a revolt in this country? Why do we take it? Let's all dress up in Guy Fawkes masks and blow up Parliament. That'll show 'em! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 Why shouldn't she have that much? You bunch of commie pinko socialists!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 The gold-digger shouldn't even get the $43M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 !@#$ing POS gold digger. 53,000 a year is plenty to live on. Hell you can even raise a family on that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeyemike Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 This chick needs a large dose of reality, and quickly. First of all, she's afraid of being childless. She's 36 years old. Last time I checked, 36 year old women can still get pregnant. If she weren't so busy spending the cash on herself, she could look into artificial insemination or find some buff 22 year old college student who's looking for a cougar. Second, this paragraph just makes me angry: Douglas-David has filed court papers saying she has more than $53,800 in weekly expenses, including maintaining a Park Avenue apartment and three residences in Sweden. Also among her weekly expenses: $700 for limousine service, $4,500 for clothes, $1,000 for hair and skin treatments, $1,500 for restaurants and entertainment, and $8,000 for travel. The American economy is in ruins, people are starving all over the world...and this b!&%^ wants it all to herself. You can only live in one place at a time...choose one! Ever hear of Target or consignment shops for your clothing? Where the heck is she eating? Morton's every night? Sorry if you don't want to live like 99.99999999% of the rest of the world...but I know for a fact that I could live very nicely on $43 million, giving much of it to charity, put the rest in conservative investments and live off the interest for the rest of my life...and probably have everything I've ever wanted or needed in the meantime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly McButterpants Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 Douglas-David has filed court papers saying she has more than $53,800 in weekly expenses, including maintaining a Park Avenue apartment and three residences in Sweden. Also among her weekly expenses: $700 for limousine service, $4,500 for clothes, $1,000 for hair and skin treatments, $1,500 for restaurants and entertainment, and $8,000 for travel. If she continued to spend at that rate, Douglas-David would burn through $43 million, not including interest, in less than 16 years. I feel so bad for her . . . OTOH - I don't think my entire clothing wardrobe is worth $4500 . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan Trapped in Pats Land Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 I don't feel bad for him at all. He's worth over 300 million, and it's not like the danger of trophy wives is not well documented. He probably thought she liked him for his looks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeyemike Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 I don't feel bad for him at all. He's worth over 300 million, and it's not like the danger of trophy wives is not well documented. He probably thought she liked him for his looks. She was just after his Viagra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 He's 67, she's 36. It's good to know people still marry for love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damj Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 He's 67, she's 36. It's good to know people still marry for love. Oldest profession in the world ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 She signed a post-nup. Why does anyone bother with these things if they're so meaningless? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millbank Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 such unsympathetic heartless beasts... you all are... poor dear, her life is going to be hell.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stussy109 Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 I wouldn't be surprised if she disappears for a small payment of 20k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millbank Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 not so fast, these days i would not be surprised, guy ends up living in a tee pee.... I wouldn't be surprised if she disappears for a small payment of 20k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 He's 67, she's 36. It's good to know people still marry for love. Welcome to the wonderful world of estate taxation. These old coots may or may not like to have to acquire a young piece of tail, may look at them as either dummies, soul mates, companions, or sperm receptacles. The central idea is keep a line of succession, and keep at bay, those millions and millions of civil service dick-beating paws - federal, state, county, city - bent on cashing in when he croaks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 19, 2009 Share Posted March 19, 2009 He's 67, she's 36. It's good to know people still marry for love. I was shocked when I was channel surfing on the radio a ways back... It sounded funny that they were quizing people on the % of people who "marry for love." All the callers and people answering were saying in the 80-90% range... I was thinking more in the 60% range... Just to low-ball since the callers were all getting it wrong. You know what the answer was: Around 25%! I knew it may be low, but not that low... I was stunned (well, really I should have been! )... Maybe I am just too naive. But, anyway... I never looked up that stat and confirmed it... I may want to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted March 20, 2009 Share Posted March 20, 2009 If they were married for 7 years, this means that he was 59 and she was 29. I'm sure that he married her because of her "intelligence". I'm sure that he married him because of his "witty sense of humor". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts