ieatcrayonz Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 What would it cost us to get Aaron Brooks from the Raiders? He'd be an improvement over JP and allow us to focus on our real needs like WR, LB and OL in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 you're slipping crayonz.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 What would it cost us to get Aaron Brooks from the Raiders? He'd be an improvement over JP and allow us to focus on our real needs like WR, LB and OL in the draft. 837010[/snapback] A medical clearance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Proof positive that VABills is Crayonz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bud8andbills Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 you're slipping crayonz.... 837012[/snapback] Hell, Keaneau (probably spelled wrong) Reeves might be a better choice. Didn't he play for... yeah right. Where in the hell did you get this idea anyways? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Proof positive that VABills is Crayonz. 837015[/snapback] I keep telling everyone that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnthonyF Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 What would it cost us to get Aaron Brooks from the Raiders? He'd be an improvement over JP and allow us to focus on our real needs like WR, LB and OL in the draft. 837010[/snapback] Are you nuts!!!!!! The stupidity of the anybody but JP metality amazes me. When it was RJ vs. Flutie there was an option. Choose RJ and pray he fulfills his promise or choose Flutie, cross your fingers and prepare for the future (i.e. groom a QB, like they did with Brees). History proves they made the wrong decision. With JP it is simple, let him loose the last 7 games see if we have something and if not get or draft a quality QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Crayonz-2 Tards-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 What would it cost us to get Aaron Brooks from the Raiders? He'd be an improvement over JP and allow us to focus on our real needs like WR, LB and OL in the draft. 837010[/snapback] LOL!!!--good one!!--thought you were serious....lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In space no one can hear Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Aaron Brooks? Wow....things have really hit rock bottom..... It's actually kind of depressing......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 Are you nuts!!!!!! The stupidity of the anybody but JP metality amazes me. When it was RJ vs. Flutie there was an option. Choose RJ and pray he fulfills his promise or choose Flutie, cross your fingers and prepare for the future (i.e. groom a QB, like they did with Brees). History proves they made the wrong decision. With JP it is simple, let him loose the last 7 games see if we have something and if not get or draft a quality QB. 837019[/snapback] Hey man don't diss crayonz, he's been right before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 What would it cost us to get Aaron Brooks from the Raiders? 837010[/snapback] A lot of money to pay the top pick in the 2008 draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJsackedagain Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 What would it cost us to get Aaron Brooks from the Raiders? He'd be an improvement over JP and allow us to focus on our real needs like WR, LB and OL in the draft. 837010[/snapback] Marv might be old, but even he's not senile like Al Davis .... I'd rather have Kelly or Ferguson try a comeback, Kemp for that matter, than see Aaron "F---in' Brooks on the Bills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 At least he would be used to playing behind a suspect O-line...but I doubt the resuts would change. PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I keep telling everyone that. 837018[/snapback] I am Spartacus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdubs Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 aaron brooks? wtf are you smokin? aaron brooks is a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoondckCL Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 aaron brooks? wtf are you smokin? aaron brooks is a joke. 837437[/snapback] I like his non stop motor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdubs Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I like his non stop motor. 837439[/snapback] another high motor great character type of guy huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swift Sylvan Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 another high motor great character type of guy huh? 837440[/snapback] I thought only DE's with the last names of Schobel, Kelsay, and Denney were allowed to have that description. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoondckCL Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I thought only DE's with the last names of Schobel, Kelsay, and Denney were allowed to have that description. 837441[/snapback] Justin Bannan was one too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts