Rayzer32 Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Did he forget to take it out of the dryer this morning? Fumble return for a TD should have been reviewed. Would have been out at the 3 and maybe we could have held them to a FG or forced a TO. Incomplete pass to Reed? Looked like he had his arms under the ball and Enberg and Crass thought is was a catch also. Would have kept the drive going. What the hell was DJ doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnakeOiler Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 I agree, not a good day for the coaches today. I don't think there was evidence for the reed catch to overturn. But the other dude was definately out. BTW, Damon Shelton was out for the 4th qtr...so they didn't have there goal line personnel available at the end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 I agree, I also would have challenged the first fumble. The Reed catch/no catch is not that big of a deal, but turnovers or anything that changed the amount of points in a game must be challenged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRT88 Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Did he forget to take it out of the dryer this morning? Fumble return for a TD should have been reviewed. Would have been out at the 3 and maybe we could have held them to a FG or forced a TO. Incomplete pass to Reed? Looked like he had his arms under the ball and Enberg and Crass thought is was a catch also. Would have kept the drive going. What the hell was DJ doing? 784591[/snapback] you are right but the Reed play would not have been overturned. There was no angled that shows he caught it for sure. I was stunned the TD return was challenged, hey maybe your defense stops them and forces 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 While watching the game I was thinking, he does know he can challenge some calls right? Peters made a nice stop and I agree, you have to at least give defense a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 The first fumble really really needs to be challenged. There are just too many unknowns with respect to refs interperating the tuck rule, which was evident in the Panthers-Vikings game last week. The others I don't really care about. I'm guessing they didn't show any good replays of the defensive TD before the Jets kicked the PAT. The Reed catch was simply not conclusive and a 2nd half time out was pretty important at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilsAlum Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 I agree as well. The coaches need to be better prepared to challenge plays. Even though the Jets would have probably scored anyways, their player was out of bounds and they should have been forced to earn the TD. Also, Reeds catch that was ruled incomplete could have been challenged as well. I understand timeouts are important but you can't be so conservative with your challenges that they wind up costing your team potential points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Jack Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 At the stadium there were only a few replays on the Jumbotron of the fumble/return TD, and not one gave a good clear shot of his foot being out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 At the stadium there were only a few replays on the Jumbotron of the fumble/return TD, and not one gave a good clear shot of his foot being out. 785005[/snapback] They showed one on TV where his foot was clearly out at the 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate Angel Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Its not Jauron, its the people upstairs that review the footage and tell him what the should and shouldnt review, On the Josh Reed play I dont think there was conclusive evidence, definately shoulda threw it on the return, I think the Jets got out on the field and kicked the Xtra point before a replay was available Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayzer32 Posted September 24, 2006 Author Share Posted September 24, 2006 At the stadium there were only a few replays on the Jumbotron of the fumble/return TD, and not one gave a good clear shot of his foot being out. 785005[/snapback] His whole foot was out too, not just his toe. It wasn't even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermike Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 The only thing I can imagine is that you screwed up, and you want the ball back to prove you can do something NOW, not three plays from now. Yes, this strategy means intentionally not tackling someone headed for the endzone, which shows about how much it's worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Did he forget to take it out of the dryer this morning? Fumble return for a TD should have been reviewed. Would have been out at the 3 and maybe we could have held them to a FG or forced a TO. Incomplete pass to Reed? Looked like he had his arms under the ball and Enberg and Crass thought is was a catch also. Would have kept the drive going. What the hell was DJ doing? 784591[/snapback] agree to an extent about the td, although they're looking at the same stuff we are, and at that point there was no film shown that indicated that he stepped out. re reed, there was nary a snowball's chance in hell that the call would have overturned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayzer32 Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 agree to an extent about the td, although they're looking at the same stuff we are, and at that point there was no film shown that indicated that he stepped out. re reed, there was nary a snowball's chance in hell that the call would have overturned. 785165[/snapback] They only showed one angle and then went right back to the game. I am sure they had more angles to look at, as they always seem to. FWIW, Enberg and that DB Cross thought is was a catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 They only showed one angle and then went right back to the game. I am sure they had more angles to look at, as they always seem to. FWIW, Enberg and that DB Cross thought is was a catch. 785174[/snapback] enberg and cross are both idiots. there was nothing there that showed he caught it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMadCap Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Jauron is yet to throw a challenge flag if IRC... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayzer32 Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 enberg and cross are both idiots. there was nothing there that showed he caught it. 785176[/snapback] Also nothing there to show he didn't catch it! Except for some zebras opinion, and we know how right on they always are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Also nothing there to show he didn't catch it! Except for some zebras opinion, and we know how right on they always are. 785248[/snapback] all of which means that it couldn't have been overturned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts