Hawk Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Glad they are getting rid of the the rule not allowing review when down by contact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 I'm surprised that they said he was not down by contact after the fumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawk Posted January 7, 2006 Author Share Posted January 7, 2006 I'm surprised that they said he was not down by contact after the fumble. 558462[/snapback] Wasnt touched.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 I cannot wait until the Patriots lose in the playoffs, then we will have no more of those stupid Diet Pepsi machine commercials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richjk21 Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Chris Simms looks like our very own Captain Checkdown..... 5/6 for 19 YDS & an INT ... could very easily be KH stats... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Nice use of your timeouts Chucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfanone Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Broken arm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 I think it was one of the plays where you know he was touched, you can put 2 and 2 together and be certain he was touched, but there was no shot on the replay that showed for sure he was touched. So even though he was touched, they can't overturn it. The Ref made the right call, and that's the way the rule should be, otherwise there would be a lot more controversy over officials/replay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 if there is one thing GW knows, it's defence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawk Posted January 7, 2006 Author Share Posted January 7, 2006 Chuckie now has the the big "M' back on his side.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 15 yard penalty on Sean Taylor for getting punched in the face. Nice call! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 I have a feeling that there was more to that than we know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 15 yard penalty on Sean Taylor for getting punched in the face. Nice call! 558508[/snapback] I think for sure taylor said something really heinous and the ref gave him the penalty for it. You could see the ref two feet away looking at Taylor and within earshot and I even think reaching for his flag before Taylor was hit in the face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Sean Taylor is now leaving the field (ejected from game?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Chinfist Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Still, it should have been offsetting, since the other guy it him in th e face. I think the ref was an idiot and gave the flag to the wrong person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 I think for sure taylor said something really heinous and the ref gave him the penalty for it. You could see the ref two feet away looking at Taylor and within earshot and I even think reaching for his flag before Taylor was hit in the face. 558510[/snapback] Shouldn't matter though. Even if that's true, shouldn't it be offsetting?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Sean Taylor is now leaving the field (ejected from game?). 558512[/snapback] Now they are speculating he spit in Pittman's face. It's getting interesting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Now they are speculating he spit in Pittman's face. It's getting interesting! 558515[/snapback] That's what I thought had happened. No other reason to eject Taylor from the game for that situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 That ref Carey may be one of the best in the game, if not the very best. There is no way he makes that call for nothing. And if Taylor spit in the guy's face, I wouldnt give the other guy a penalty for slapping Taylor either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 Now they are speculating he spit in Pittman's face. It's getting interesting! 558515[/snapback] did you hear the ref? After he called the personal foul on taylor, he said that it was for spitting in the face of the opponent. I'm watchin the game with puhonix, and he heard the same thing. (he's got TIVO and we rewound it, the call is tough to hear because of the crowd, he DID say it was for spitting) BUT, there still should have been another flag on pittman for offsetting penalties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts