Alaska Darin Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Why? We just dropped five or so draft spots. 541749[/snapback] Good. That's where the real value is anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffan00 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Why? We just dropped five or so draft spots. 541749[/snapback] Yep, went from top 5 to 9-10..hope it was worth it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Merry !@#$ing christmas everbody! What a gut check for the heart of this team. I'll take it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Good. That's where the real value is anyway. 541752[/snapback] Yeah. I fail to see this inordinate level of interest in getting an expensive high 1st-round pick by the same people that B word about Donahoe's track record with expensive high 1st-round picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Do you hate that he's right? It's not a talent issue. 541747[/snapback] it is a talent issue on the offensive and defensive lines, i think. but i've stated my case on this point already! by the way, moulds is proving me a little bit wrong - i've never thought he wasn't still at least pretty good, but i have to say that he is better than that. he's played damn well the last couple of weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Bills Fan Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Yep, went from top 5 to 9-10..hope it was worth it! 541754[/snapback] Every Time the BILLS WIN it's worth it, no matter what some people think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Real Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Yep, went from top 5 to 9-10..hope it was worth it! 541754[/snapback] What a bag of fuggin whiners you are. We won, be happy and stfu. God. T_R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Yeah. I fail to see this inordinate level of interest in getting an expensive high 1st-round pick by the same people that B word about Donahoe's track record with expensive high 1st-round picks. 541757[/snapback] Exactly. I can think of other uses for that money than tying it up on one player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Good. That's where the real value is anyway. 541752[/snapback] absofreakinglutely. as i've said before, having the guys who are playing for us *now* (and into the future) improve is the most important thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kgun5 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Yeah. I fail to see this inordinate level of interest in getting an expensive high 1st-round pick by the same people that B word about Donahoe's track record with expensive high 1st-round picks. 541757[/snapback] so, because our GM sucks at drafting, we should not want high picks? Doesn't it follow that TD will suck with the lower picks too? I fail to see how this fits in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 so, because our GM sucks at drafting, we should not want high picks? Doesn't it follow that TD will suck with the lower picks too? I fail to see how this fits in here. 541769[/snapback] Uh, higher picks cost ALOT more? Mike Williams is the highest paid player on the team. Make more sense now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kgun5 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Uh, higher picks cost ALOT more? Mike Williams is the highest paid player on the team. Make more sense now? 541773[/snapback] Nope...still doesn't. Is the cap really an issue with this team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 so, because our GM sucks at drafting, we should not want high picks? Doesn't it follow that TD will suck with the lower picks too? I fail to see how this fits in here. 541769[/snapback] jim kelly was 14th overall. thurman thomas was 37th. andre reed was a 4th rounder. eric moulds was 23rd overall. bruce, oj, and shane conlan are the only top 5 draft picks that i can think of that actually panned out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffan00 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 absofreakinglutely. as i've said before, having the guys who are playing for us *now* (and into the future) improve is the most important thing. 541764[/snapback] Wish JP would have won this game! Given us a little hope for next season! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Well, there is the hope that TD is gone. And I didn't get to see it. !@#$ing Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Nope...still doesn't. Is the cap really an issue with this team? 541777[/snapback] is having the players who are actually on the team now improve an issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kgun5 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 bruce, oj, and shane conlan are the only top 5 draft picks that i can think of that actually panned out. 541778[/snapback] How many should a team have/need? That's not to be sarcastic, but three very high picks that pan out seems like a lot to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kgun5 Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 is having the players who are actually on the team now improve an issue? 541783[/snapback] Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 How many should a team have/need? That's not to be sarcastic, but three very high picks that pan out seems like a lot to me. 541784[/snapback] The salary cap makes it an issue and you don't have the luxury of missing on a top 5 pick because it can cost you quality depth. Oh, and we're probably going to win next week, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 How many should a team have/need? That's not to be sarcastic, but three very high picks that pan out seems like a lot to me. 541784[/snapback] walt patulski. tom cousineau. mike williams. phil dokes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(2).thumb.jpeg.6e78fe3142ec9e6bfedbf027610db26f.jpeg)
Recommended Posts