gtw3 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago As frustrating as he has been, I really hope these past two weeks got his head right and he goes out and has himself a game. Maybe a "Mossed" moment over Ramsay for good measure. ...I am probably being greedy Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago To simplify the Moore stuff - he wanted more targets, an effort to get him involved rather than the tiny role he had. Not unexpected, it’s the issue with Brady’s offense and I had been saying for weeks stop trying to get every guy on the bench involved, especially splitting reps between Moore and Samuel, pick one and get that guy more involved in the offense. And that guy should have been Moore over Samuel. Quote
Not at the table Karlos Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, NeverOutNick said: Why even keep Curtis Samuel over Elijah Moore when he brings absolutely nothing to the table and is always injured We would have to clear more cap space to cut Samuel. So cutting or restructuring someone. Didn’t have to with Moore. Like others have said Moore also wanted to be used more. Quote
Conlan58 Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago I'm curious to see if anyone signs Moore to become a starter. He would likely get more reps, and possibly even be featured. How is no one talking about this? 1 Quote
machine gun kelly Posted 19 minutes ago Posted 19 minutes ago 5 hours ago, NeverOutNick said: Why even keep Curtis Samuel over Elijah Moore when he brings absolutely nothing to the table and is always injured I wondered the same other than it was dead cap. As far as purely talent, Moore could’ve been better. He was misused by Brady (shocker). I pray it’s Cooks, Davis/Shavers alternating, and Shakir. Kinkaid was limited TR so we’ll see. If he’s a little banged up, just use Knox wisely. What worries me is no Brown and Dawkins. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.