What does "Complementary Football" mean in Bills Coachspeak?

[Chaos]

17 minutes ago, Freddie's Dead said:

I'm shocked, SHOCKED, that you actually used the correct term, complementary football.  "Complimentary" football is either football that's free to all, or it's when Josh says "Nice catch, Dawson" and Dawson says "Nice throw, Josh."

I blundered at first. but then corrected it. I was helped out by a grammar nazi. 

[The Jokeman]

 

 

1 hour ago, sven233 said:

It means you have a lack of top talent and the only way you can win is with a ball control offense and hopefully limiting the other teams offensive snaps so your terrible defense doesn't have to be on the field as much.

 

What it is, is a losers mentality.  Screw complimentary football.  Build an offense around the best player on the planet and blow teams off the field.  Score 40 and make a couple stops on defense and you will be a much better team.  If you can get out ahead of teams and make them 1 dimensional, you will actually make it much easier on your undersized defense.  But we don't have a coach that wants to play that way.

Apparently you missed the 1990s Super Bowl run Bills. 

[Chaos]

2 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

 

 

Apparently you missed the 1990s Super Bowl run Bills. 

Do you mean the team that made it to the Super Bowl four times in a row.  I am not sure nine years of no super bowls is better. Maybe that is just me. 

[The Jokeman]

4 minutes ago, Chaos said:

Do you mean the team that made it to the Super Bowl four times in a row.  I am not sure nine years of no super bowls is better. Maybe that is just me. 

Those teams were flawed. If we ran any kind of traditional offense we might have won  a Super Bowl or two IMO. Yet everyone wants to go crazy over our great offense until it fell apart in the most important game of the season. Not just once but four times. 

[BigAl2526]

Offense, defense and special teams are each part of the solution and none is part of the problem when it comes to the challenge of winning games.  

[WideNine]

4 hours ago, bmur66 said:

It means control the clock and don't score too fast because you will expose the defense.

This is the narrative that gets the most play as if the offense did the defense any favors last week.

Twice the Bills offense turned the ball over deep in their own zone only to have the defense limit Houston to 2 field goals:
 

1. Interception #1: Josh Allen was picked off by Calen Bullock after a tipped pass late in the second quarter. The return was wiped out by penalty, but Houston started at the Bills’ 25-yard line and kicked a field goal.

 

2. Fumble: Khalil Shakir lost the ball after a catch in the third quarter. Bullock forced it, and Jaylen Reed recovered at the Bills’ 22-yard line, leading to another field goal.

Other than the Cook long TD, the offense did not put any points on the board. We had 2 field goals and a STs kickoff return for a TD. Josh Allen threw for 253 yards but had zero passing touchdowns, two interceptions, and was sacked eight times. Not arguing that we have a good defense - we don't, but the offense has been inconsistent too and not very complimentary either.


 

[JP51]

Do your job.

[HappyDays]

3 hours ago, sven233 said:

Screw complimentary football.  Build an offense around the best player on the planet and blow teams off the field.  Score 40 and make a couple stops on defense and you will be a much better team.

 

Yes. The mistake they made is they decided the goal is to have 8 possessions and score TDs on 50% of them. The league average is less than 25% of drives turn into TDs so we intentionally set the margin for error impossibly low. With the best player in the league at QB, the proper goal should be score 40 PPG and screw the down to down efficiency. The Tampa Bay win may not have been "efficient" or "complementary" QB play but you look up and all of a sudden Allen has 6 TDs. That should be the game script that you build the team around. The offense doesn't need to complement anything, it needs to run up the score and make the other two phases practically irrelevant. Especially under current management when you can never rely on the other two phases to lead the way in big games. McDermott made the mistake of betting on his process instead of betting on his unicorn, and he unfortunately dragged Beane down the same path.