Kelly to Allen Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Beck Water said: It's not the (now proven) report that he would be inactive again tonight that I question. I agree, there are a lot of people who might have that info and share it. It's all the stuff about how "The Bills think Keon Coleman “has not grown as a person” His reaction to being a scratch VS The Bucs was not take over well, and he apparently believed “it was just one meeting, what’s the big deal.” The Bills obviously did not like that. This is all per an NFL Credentialed source I will not name." First of all WTF is an "NFL Credentialed Source"? A team credentialed member of the press? It doesn't say a Bills coach or staff member or player. So how do they know what the Bills think? Dion and McDermott have gone on record saying that he got the message and understood it couldn't happen going forward. Coleman has said he understands it can't keep happening. Now it's possible that's all Smoke and Mirrors. Or it's possible that this @Billsreport account is taking what's factual (Coleman benched again) and fluffing it up. Me, I think it was an abnormal week with walkthroughs and light (if any) practices, and part of what the Bills likely want to see is what kind of effort Coleman puts out during a normal week of practice. They want to see him walk the walk, not just talk the talk. How do you know he's not taking it too well? I personally don't think Coleman is inactive again because he was allegedly late to meetings. I think he's incompetent as a wr and overwhelmed with the nuances of the position. This is my speculation Quote
stevewin Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago FWIW on Amazon pre-show they said he was not late for anything this week 1 Quote
Beck Water Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Kelly to Allen said: I personally don't think Coleman is inactive again because he was allegedly late to meetings. I think he's incompetent as a wr and overwhelmed with the nuances of the position. This is my speculation The "late to meetings" doesn't seem to be alleged. Coleman acknowledges it, team acknowledges it (seems to be some question about late vs so late, the meeting was over before he arrived) I doubted he'd get out of the doghouse without a full week of high-effort practice. As for your opinion, my own eyeballs can see he was half-assing routes and he doesn't seem to be very QB friendly when Allen breaks the pocket. Why that is, can't tell you - absent inside info, your guess is as good as another. I do think if Davis and Shavers have a good game, Coleman is going to find himself playing "left bench" for a while. 4 Quote
Kelly to Allen Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, Beck Water said: The "late to meetings" doesn't seem to be alleged. Coleman acknowledges it, team acknowledges it (seems to be some question about late vs so late, the meeting was over before he arrived) I doubted he'd get out of the doghouse without a full week of high-effort practice. As for your opinion, my own eyeballs can see he was half-assing routes and he doesn't seem to be very QB friendly when Allen breaks the pocket. Why that is, can't tell you - absent inside info, your guess is as good as another. I do think if Davis and Shavers have a good game, Coleman is going to find himself playing "left bench" for a while. I agree 💯 Quote
Bockeye Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 28 minutes ago, Walking Tall said: Nope. Coleman’s spot on the roster needs to be addressed this coming off season. They can’t afford to have it be an issue once again two off-seasons from now. I don’t have a problem with this if he has zero awareness and continues his poor trajectory. You have a good point. I guess i may have wrongly assumed he would show some signs of heading in the right direction.. Time will tell. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.