Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, LDD said:

 

BS...a baby born here is a US citizen.

Yeah which is why it should be changed

1 hour ago, LDD said:

 

There's a lot to talk about with immigration but where should this child go?  

To where their parents came from along with their parents. I’m just tryna keep families together.

1 hour ago, LDD said:

 

Let me guess, you're pro-life??  

No. People raising children they either can’t or don’t want to provide for is what causes dysfunctional adults that are allowed to vote.

1 hour ago, LDD said:

What else would you like to change in the Constitution?  

Abolish the 16th. Any other questions?

Edited by gobills404
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, gobills404 said:

Yeah which is why it should be changed

To where their parents came from along with their parents. I’m just tryna keep families together.

No. People raising children they either can’t or don’t want to provide for is what causes dysfunctional adults that are allowed to vote.

Abolish the 16th. Any other questions?

Fair enough, I disagree. It was written into the Constitution for a reason and we should not get into “abolishing” parts of the Constitution on a whim. 
one more question…

What did those babies do to you? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, LDD said:

What did those babies do to you? 

Nothing. But their parents use them as a loophole to abuse our immigration system. I want to close the loophole.

  • Agree 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, JFKjr said:

d5uo7bqxzceC.jpeg

And what a majority needs to do is sweeten the bill to force 7 Dems to vote for it to pass it. That’s how politics works. It’s not clear what the off ramp is for either party now. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, LDD said:

Fair enough, I disagree. It was written into the Constitution for a reason and we should not get into “abolishing” parts of the Constitution on a whim. 
one more question…

What did those babies do to you? 

If there is one thing I would like to change about our courts is the reference to previous decisions that were made poorly or based on obviously incorrect interpretations. The amendment clearly states "under the jurisdiction" which means while following the laws. If someone is here illegally, then not following the laws. At this point though we would need to modify the Constitution because legally the anyone born here is a citizen thing is the law. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

One notable thing I’m seeing on social media is a lot of black dudes roasting black women for having their EBT/Snap cut off.


This issue doesn’t seem to be generating a high level of sympathy from anyone. 

 

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, SCBills said:

One notable thing I’m seeing on social media is a lot of black dudes roasting black women for having their EBT/Snap cut off.


This issue doesn’t seem to be generating a high level of sympathy from anyone. 

 

People haven’t started starving yet. Biz is really up at our local foodbank   Hurray!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

People haven’t started starving yet. Biz is really up at our local foodbank   Hurray!


I’m for a societal safety net. 
 

I’m also against that safety net being abused. 
 

And no, honestly, I don’t care how much tax dollars go to Snap/EBT compared to the Military or whatever leftists want to respond with.. watching people openly abuse the system, gloat about it for years and now threaten people if they don’t get their money is beyond radicalizing on this issue.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

If there is one thing I would like to change about our courts is the reference to previous decisions that were made poorly or based on obviously incorrect interpretations. The amendment clearly states "under the jurisdiction" which means while following the laws. If someone is here illegally, then not following the laws. At this point though we would need to modify the Constitution because legally the anyone born here is a citizen thing is the law. 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the purpose of the amendment to protect the babies of parents who were brought here against their will to be slaves? These are different times. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Hank II said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the purpose of the amendment to protect the babies of parents who were brought here against their will to be slaves? These are different times. 

 

 

 

You are 100% correct...

×
×
  • Create New...