B-Man Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 59 minutes ago, wnyguy said: Arctic Frost? The Bills already have a uniform for that. Hopefully those will be thrown in 'jail' also.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, nedboy7 said: Kash Patel's FBI? I dont give it any credibility. Hoax What's your thoughts on the FBI protecting a pedo ring and President BoneSpur still considering pardoning Gislaine. Hmmm, you think Kash Patel manufactured evidence, and that he has conspired with Chuck Grassley to deceive the public in a manner similar to the Steele dossier? I think that’s unlikely, and naive on your part. You’re consistent in that regard. As for “protecting” anyone, you’re going to have to expand on that a bit. Help me out, especially as it relates to the last, non-Kash Patel FBI. Surely they were prosecuting someone, somewhere in the ring before leadership changed? Or, were they part of the cover up? On “considering pardons”, I would be against pardoning Maxwell, as I was against pardoning the hardcore J6 perps and Joe Biden’s entire family tree. Still, law enforcement in general has a long history of working deals, using confidential informants and letting very bad guys go in exchange for something else they perceive as valuable. On the level of pardons, most people seem to get upset when it’s the other guy pardoning, and apathetic when it’s their guy doing the pardon. I think you’re probably in that camp. I guess if Maxwell offered enough value in getting the really big fish in exchange for a pardon, it would get done and most people would move on, disgusted, feeling dirty but knowing it happens. The challenge is there doesn’t seem to be any big fish to get. Team Biden would have burned Republicans and anyone in Trumps orbit. Team Trump would do the same, yet here we are. Personally, I think evidence against powerful people was deep-sixxed, and/or kept for leverage by very powerful people in govt.
nedboy7 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Hmmm, you think Kash Patel manufactured evidence, and that he has conspired with Chuck Grassley to deceive the public in a manner similar to the Steele dossier? I think that’s unlikely, and naive on your part. You’re consistent in that regard. As for “protecting” anyone, you’re going to have to expand on that a bit. Help me out, especially as it relates to the last, non-Kash Patel FBI. Surely they were prosecuting someone, somewhere in the ring before leadership changed? Or, were they part of the cover up? On “considering pardons”, I would be against pardoning Maxwell, as I was against pardoning the hardcore J6 perps and Joe Biden’s entire family tree. Still, law enforcement in general has a long history of working deals, using confidential informants and letting very bad guys go in exchange for something else they perceive as valuable. On the level of pardons, most people seem to get upset when it’s the other guy pardoning, and apathetic when it’s their guy doing the pardon. I think you’re probably in that camp. I guess if Maxwell offered enough value in getting the really big fish in exchange for a pardon, it would get done and most people would move on, disgusted, feeling dirty but knowing it happens. The challenge is there doesn’t seem to be any big fish to get. Team Biden would have burned Republicans and anyone in Trumps orbit. Team Trump would do the same, yet here we are. Personally, I think evidence against powerful people was deep-sixxed, and/or kept for leverage by very powerful people in govt. I don’t have a guy. I was very critical of Biden. But I’ve lived in an autocratic country and I can tell what Project 2025 and Trumps maneuvers are about. Kinda ends discussion to claim the other side can’t be trusted at all right? How do you have a discussion. It’s not possible to have a rational conversation on here. Enjoy.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 15 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: I don’t have a guy. I was very critical of Biden. But I’ve lived in an autocratic country and I can tell what Project 2025 and Trumps maneuvers are about. Kinda ends discussion to claim the other side can’t be trusted at all right? How do you have a discussion. It’s not possible to have a rational conversation on here. Enjoy. I see myself as rational, and just responded to your suggestion that story about surveillance of GOP senators is as a “hoax”. From there you asked about the FBI and pardons. If what I wrote is irrational, feel free to point out the irrational part. I think it’s common knowledge and generally acceptable that this is how things work. There is precious little purity involved, just deal-making and people doing all sorts of nasty and distasteful stuff. It’s not all bad, there are good people doing hard work too, but it really is what it is. But, I get it. I hope you have a good night. Edited 2 hours ago by leh-nerd skin-erd 1
nedboy7 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I see myself as rational, and just responded to your suggestion that story about surveillance of GOP senators is as a “hoax”. From there you asked about the FBI and pardons. If what I wrote is irrational, feel free to point out the irrational part. I think it’s common knowledge and generally acceptable that this is how things work. There is precious little purity to involved, just deal and people doing all sorts of nasty and distasteful stuff. But, I get it. I hope you have a good night. I called it a hoax to reflect how absurd it is to just call everything from the “other” party on here as a hoax. It would be disingenuous to say that is not how left leaning narratives are portrayed on here. Seems like you agree on that actually in a funny way. As for the pedo files it was the right who claimed for years that the left were pedophile child eating sex traffickers. Epstein claimed Trump was his best friend. Not Biden. I have no problem with anyone on the files to face justice. But now maga seems to think this is not a real issue. The mental gymnastics you went thru to explain why they aren’t released perhaps has some validity. But obviously there is way more to it than that if you don’t only read the right leaning narrative on this. I hope that was rational enough for you. Indeed have a nice evening.
JDHillFan Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 44 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: It’s not possible to have a rational conversation on here. On 8/2/2025 at 8:15 AM, nedboy7 said: I think it’s funny that you got nothing to say as usual but defend your idiotic cult dickcunt. 😜 Sigh
JDHillFan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 31 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: I called it a hoax to reflect how absurd it is to just call everything from the “other” party on here as a hoax. It would be disingenuous to say that is not how left leaning narratives are portrayed on here. If you were to use the search function looking for “hoax” used by the ultra partisan leftist known as SectionC3, how many hits do you think you will get? No need to look. It’s 1308. Edited 1 hour ago by JDHillFan
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 50 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: If you were to use the search function looking for “hoax” used by the ultra partisan leftist known as SectionC3, how many hits do you think you will get? No need to look. It’s 1308. how many times does trump lie per day on average?
JDHillFan Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: how many times does trump lie per day on average? Outstanding comparison! Excellent work on your part. I’m actually taken aback at the relevance!
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 59 minutes ago Posted 59 minutes ago (edited) seems section C3 has many more hoaxes to complain about. Lies are hoaxes. I doubt he can keep up with the orange shyster. from wiki: Fact-checkers at The Washington Post documented 30,573 false or misleading claims during his first presidential term, an average of 21 per day. The meaning of HOAX is to trick into believing or accepting as genuine something false and often preposterous. from websters. Edited 56 minutes ago by Joe Ferguson forever
JDHillFan Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago (edited) 15 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: seems section C3 has many more hoaxes to complain about. Lies are hoaxes. I doubt he can keep up with the orange shyster. from wiki: Fact-checkers at The Washington Post documented 30,573 false or misleading claims during his first presidential term, an average of 21 per day. The meaning of HOAX is to trick into believing or accepting as genuine something false and often preposterous. from websters. You’re on fire! good god man here’s a real hoax for you… Edited 43 minutes ago by JDHillFan
BillsFanNC Posted 31 minutes ago Author Posted 31 minutes ago Look here at all the lies WaPo documented that Trump said! 😂 😂 Friggin Quack!!
Recommended Posts