Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 19 Posted September 19 6 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: This thread is about the 20th this month that is just Democrats showing how gullible they are to obvious lies. @Joe Ferguson forever, @4th&long, @Homelander @Trump_is_Mentally_fit all post crap without even giving it a second thought if it might be untrue. The funniest part is they will accuse of me of believing whatever Trump tells me when I literally never post anything he says directly, because he is a politician. What might be untrue? The sleazy FCC director publicly bragged about threatening Disney and Nexstar 1 1
JDHillFan Posted September 19 Posted September 19 14 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: What a bunch of phonies these "conservatives" are. Pretenders. They are statists through and through. They want the government to decide what we watch, who we buy goods from, to tax us capriciously and to worship one of the most ignorant buffoons ever elected to any office Then they say "don't call us fascists" Oh boy Is that the first time you have ever used capriciously in a sentence? They say you can’t teach an old dog new tricks. WRONG. Kudos to you for spelling it correctly as well. Very impressive. Not impressive - the rest of the post. More overwrought dramatics. Sad. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 19 Posted September 19 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: What might be untrue? The sleazy FCC director publicly bragged about threatening Disney and Nexstar The truth is Kimmel was already on the chopping block. His doubling down on the maga ***** is just the icing on the cake.
Orlando Buffalo Posted September 19 Posted September 19 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: What might be untrue? The sleazy FCC director publicly bragged about threatening Disney and Nexstar Do you think Jimmy Kimmel was losing Disney money for the past 4 years minimum?
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 53 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: from your link: The First Amendment also prohibits the government from coercing private actors to take actions that suppress other private entities' speech.11 1
SectionC3 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 On 9/18/2025 at 10:09 AM, Royale with Cheese said: He lied. The FCC doesn't protect Trump, it protects consumers from integrity communications. Kimmel violated it. He intentionally lied to the public in a public platform. Freedom of Speech has limits. You can't say bomb on a plane. You cant say you're going to murder people. You can't violate conditions of the FCC. Got that rule yet?
thenorthremembers Posted September 19 Posted September 19 42 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: What a bunch of phonies these "conservatives" are. Pretenders. They are statists through and through. They want the government to decide what we watch, who we buy goods from, to tax us capriciously and to worship one of the most ignorant buffoons ever elected to any office Then they say "don't call us fascists" Oh boy Where was this energy when Roseanne was thrown off her own show? Or when Gina Carano was thrown off the Mandalorian? Spare me the outrage. 2
SectionC3 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Typical spin. He can still say whatever he wants. Freedom ! He hasn't been thrown in prison. But the marketplace decided that he overstepped it's decency , by lying on the air (not in a joke ) But you knew that. . Why did the FCC threaten ABC? 46 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: What a bunch of phonies these "conservatives" are. Pretenders. They are statists through and through. They want the government to decide what we watch, who we buy goods from, to tax us capriciously and to worship one of the most ignorant buffoons ever elected to any office Then they say "don't call us fascists" Oh boy It’s me speech they want. Not free speech. Just now, thenorthremembers said: Where was this energy when Roseanne was thrown off her own show? Or when Gina Carano was thrown off the Mandalorian? Spare me the outrage. The FCC didn’t threaten licenses there. HUGE difference. 1
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: Got that rule yet? I gave it to you multiple times. But the root cause of the problem here is you don't understand or know the definition of prohibit. You're fighting this weird battle. Yes or no. You didn't answer this question last time. If you see a sign at a lake, and it says "Swimming Prohibited". Does that mean you can or can't swim in that lake? I will give you a hint, the keyword is "prohibited."
SectionC3 Posted September 19 Posted September 19 6 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: It wasn’t a lie. It’s an opinion. And parts of MAGA are morally culpable. Prove me wrong.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Why did the FCC threaten ABC? It’s me speech they want. Not free speech. The FCC didn’t threaten licenses there. HUGE difference. Just now, SectionC3 said: It wasn’t a lie. It’s an opinion. And parts of MAGA are morally culpable. Prove me wrong. He intentionally mislead and that violates the integrity issue. You are wrong. You don't even know how to look up the word prohibit and we live in the age of google. 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: It wasn’t a lie. It’s an opinion. And parts of MAGA are morally culpable. Prove me wrong. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47986#:~:text=A free speech question might,government can restrict the speech.&text=Under this test%2C the court,might trigger more stringent scrutiny. The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that speech made by public employees within the scope of their official duties is not protected by the First Amendment, though speech made as a private citizen on matters of public concern can be protected by a balancing test. For private sector employees, the First Amendment generally does not apply, and speech protections depend on specific federal and state laws, as well as union contracts. 1
4th&long Posted September 19 Posted September 19 4 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: So what if he was attacking Maga? Trump attacks everyone and you love him. Cry me a river. Now if he praised the shooter or celebrated Kirks killing then I can see action needing to be taken. Now what he said was stupid but hardly worth giving up free speech for.
Another Fan Posted September 19 Posted September 19 I'll post this before it gets removed from YouTube. But he's "seen the light"since. I'll admit I don't know all the details about what he said that got him cancelled... he has just always struck me as a colossal d-bag for years what he turned into. 1
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 Just now, 4th&long said: So what if he was attacking Maga? Trump attacks everyone and you love him. Cry me a river. Now if he praised the shooter or celebrated Kirks killing then I can see action needing to be taken. Now what he said was stupid but hardly worth giving up free speech for. Why do you support a racist like Jimmy Kimmel? Also. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47986#:~:text=A free speech question might, government can restrict the speech .&text=Under this test%2C the court, might trigger more stringent scrutiny The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that speech made by public employees within the scope of their official duties is not protected by the First Amendment, though speech made as a private citizen on matters of public concern can be protected by a balancing test. For private sector employees, the First Amendment generally does not apply, and speech protections depend on specific federal and state laws, as well as union contracts. Just now, Another Fan said: I'll post this before it gets removed from YouTube. But he's "seen the light"since. I'll admit I don't know all the details about what he said that got him cancelled... he has just always struck me as a colossal d-bag for years what he turned into. @4th&long I can't believe you support racists. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 19 Posted September 19 48 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: The truth is Kimmel was already on the chopping block. His doubling down on the maga ***** is just the icing on the cake. so why did the FCC need to threaten?
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: so why did the FCC need to threaten? Because they felt he was in violation of FCC policies. 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 19 Posted September 19 10 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Why do you support a racist like Jimmy Kimmel? Also. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47986#:~:text=A free speech question might, government can restrict the speech .&text=Under this test%2C the court, might trigger more stringent scrutiny The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that speech made by public employees within the scope of their official duties is not protected by the First Amendment, though speech made as a private citizen on matters of public concern can be protected by a balancing test. For private sector employees, the First Amendment generally does not apply, and speech protections depend on specific federal and state laws, as well as union contracts. @4th&long I can't believe you support racists. you keep posting this. I'm not a lawyer and I'l;l bet you aren't either. II don't think the excerpt supports your narrative. Perhaps one of the boards lawyers cn chime in. Constitutional lawyers appear to have a consensus that this was unconstitutional. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 19 Posted September 19 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: so why did the FCC need to threaten? Cause ***** you guys that's why 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 19 Posted September 19 1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said: Because they felt he was in violation of FCC policies. he wasn't in violation. yjey didn't need to threaten ABC. They could have just followed established FCC enforcement measures. trump wasn't banned from twitter through coercion on the goats part...
Royale with Cheese Posted September 19 Posted September 19 5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: you keep posting this. I'm not a lawyer and I'l;l bet you aren't either. II don't think the excerpt supports your narrative. Perhaps one of the boards lawyers cn chime in. Constitutional lawyers appear to have a consensus that this was unconstitutional. 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: he wasn't in violation. yjey didn't need to threaten ABC. They could have just followed established FCC enforcement measures. trump wasn't banned from twitter through coercion on the goats part... I thought the main topic was silencing free speech? Trump was silenced. Yep.
Recommended Posts