milfandcookies Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Erika Kirk-Vance was right next to the president at the swearing in event for the US ambassador to India yesterday why
nedboy7 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago How come no one is talking about the sacrificial assassination on Kirk. Endless military and gun experts have talked about how the assassination was staged.
JDHillFan Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 32 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: How come no one is talking about the sacrificial assassination on Kirk. Endless military and gun experts have talked about how the assassination was staged. Because it’s bullsh*t. Conspiracy theories are a business these days. The purveyors rely on people like you. looking forward to your Trump-related response and something about pedo worshipers. Sigh. Edited 7 hours ago by JDHillFan 1 1
boyst Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, nedboy7 said: How come no one is talking about the sacrificial assassination on Kirk. Endless military and gun experts have talked about how the assassination was staged. ...and leftists say the Q-Anon thing was a ridiculous conspiracy. lol jfk... jet fuel melting steel beams... what else? jfc.
B-Man Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, milfandcookies said: Erika Kirk-Vance was right next to the president at the swearing in event for the US ambassador to India yesterday why Well, even the slightest bit of looking into shows that Sergio Gor was a close friend of Charlie Kirk, so Trump invited her to speak. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/charlie-loved-you-erika-kirk-gives-blessings-to-sergio-gor-at-his-swearing-in-as-us-ambassador-to-india/articleshow/125248753.cms And a quick note. Using the childish term "Erika Kirk Vance" gives your true biases away. But keep pretending. . Edited 5 hours ago by B-Man
The Frankish Reich Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Because it’s bullsh*t. Conspiracy theories are a business these days. The purveyors rely on people like you. Good thing you're not falling for the J6 "Gait Analysis Perp" thing.
milfandcookies Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 35 minutes ago, B-Man said: Well, even the slightest bit of looking into shows that Sergio Gor was a close friend of Charlie Kirk, so Trump invited her to speak. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/charlie-loved-you-erika-kirk-gives-blessings-to-sergio-gor-at-his-swearing-in-as-us-ambassador-to-india/articleshow/125248753.cms And a quick note. Using the childish term "Erika Kirk Vance" gives your true biases away. But keep pretending. . it was a question, thanks for answering. And I’m not pretending anything, I’ve shared multiple times that I feel uneasy about Erika Kirk’s quick recovery and that I believe her and “Vance” will hook up
JDHillFan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 27 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Good thing you're not falling for the J6 "Gait Analysis Perp" thing. I’m waiting for your treatise on the “junk science” aspect of it. I imagine it’s going to be a very long wait. You should also consider fine-tuning your reading discernment. I have offered no opinion on the validity of the current claims being made by Beck and crew. Just laughing at your reaction to it. You believe the bomber is a bad maga person, right? Let’s hope he/she/they see justice. I know from prior comments that you believe the J6ers will rot in hell. Same hopes for the bomber?
The Frankish Reich Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 9 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You believe the bomber is a bad maga person, right? The theory of why a MAGA J6er would place pipe bombs near the Capitol is simple: it would likely cause chaos and delay the counting of votes - the very same counting of votes that Trump was urging Pence to delay. The theory of why a Biden supporter would do that is, well, what? To gain sympathy for Kamala? As I understand it, it is something like this would make public opinion turn against Trump (the same public opinion that had just caused him to lose the election, so why does anyone need to shift it?) by showing his supporters to be violent. Thankfully his supporters obliged by being violent the following morning. 1
JDHillFan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: The theory of why a MAGA J6er would place pipe bombs near the Capitol is simple: it would likely cause chaos and delay the counting of votes - the very same counting of votes that Trump was urging Pence to delay. The theory of why a Biden supporter would do that is, well, what? To gain sympathy for Kamala? As I understand it, it is something like this would make public opinion turn against Trump (the same public opinion that had just caused him to lose the election, so why does anyone need to shift it?) by showing his supporters to be violent. Thankfully his supporters obliged by being violent the following morning. I just can’t believe the Biden administration did not move heaven and earth to bring this person to justice. They seemingly found every other granny that acted out that day. Hard to believe they couldn’t come up with anything related to the cell phone usage of the perp. Almost as hard to believe is you getting upset over the possibility there could be a lead in the case. Junk science! In the AI era no less. Have you ever made a post indicating that you want this person brought to justice?
The Frankish Reich Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Just now, JDHillFan said: I just can’t believe the Biden administration did not move heaven and earth to bring this person to justice. They seemingly found every other granny that acted out that day. Hard to believe they couldn’t come up with anything related to the cell phone usage of the perp. Almost as hard to believe is you getting upset over the possibility there could be a lead in the case. Junk science! In the AI era no less. Have you ever made a post indicating that you want this person brought to justice? 3 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Conspiracy theories are a business these days. The purveyors rely on people like you.
JDHillFan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 19 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: There’s no conspiracy regarding not hauling this person in. It’s a simple fact. It has yet to happen. I’m dissatisfied that there is a Maga bomber roaming free. Can’t believe you are OK with it. Edited 4 hours ago by JDHillFan
The Frankish Reich Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: There’s no conspiracy regarding not hauling this person in. It’s a simple fact. It has yet to happen. I’m dissatisfied that there is a Maga bomber roaming free. Can’t believe you are OK with it. "Haul her in" based on ... her average height and gait analysis. This is the best survey I could find re: forensic gait analysis. Not compelling evidence to say the least. I don't expect you to read it; the worst conspiracy theorist is the one with no self-awareness. https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/19470676/royal_society_forensic_gait_analysis_primer_for_courts.pdf
JDHillFan Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: "Haul her in" based on ... her average height and gait analysis. This is the best survey I could find re: forensic gait analysis. Not compelling evidence to say the least. I don't expect you to read it; the worst conspiracy theorist is the one with no self-awareness. https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/19470676/royal_society_forensic_gait_analysis_primer_for_courts.pdf I noticed you had no comments on the link I provided from a US government agency. Seems like it would have been a good chance to beef up your “junk science” claim. Now this paper from the U of Dundee, published in 2017, is “the best” you can find? What makes it the best? Are you even trying? You have moved from “junk science” to a “primer for courts” published 8 years ago. Let’s just agree that, even though you won’t say it, we both want this Maga bomber brought to justice.
The Frankish Reich Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 27 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I noticed you had no comments on the link I provided from a US government agency. Seems like it would have been a good chance to beef up your “junk science” claim. Now this paper from the U of Dundee, published in 2017, is “the best” you can find? What makes it the best? Are you even trying? You have moved from “junk science” to a “primer for courts” published 8 years ago. Let’s just agree that, even though you won’t say it, we both want this Maga bomber brought to justice. Junk science.
JDHillFan Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said: Junk science. Weak. Redhawk-level weak. I know that’s hurtful but you did it to yourself.
milfandcookies Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I don’t even know what you guys are talking about lol
BillsFanNC Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago Bomber cell phone data corrupted, secret service comms deleted, multi ton Capitol doors (malfunctioned?), less than lethal weaponry misused, bomb sniffing dogs can't sniff bombs... And then....J6 committee data and transcripts deleted... Seems a lot went awry on J5/J6 and afterwards other than the MAGA insurrection, eh Finding? Super weird. Junk investigations indeed.
Recommended Posts