Big Blitz Posted Tuesday at 05:30 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:30 PM This POS tried to set up a terrorist training camp in Oregon. And about to elect as mayor of NYC a pro Hamas communist. Gone. Completely gone. 1 1
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 05:43 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:43 PM Your side is never going to win. Your grip on society is a rope of sand.
Big Blitz Posted Tuesday at 05:45 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 05:45 PM 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Your side is never going to win. Your grip on society is a rope of sand. ^^^^^ Just admitted he’s on the side of terrorists. Told you. 1
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 05:58 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:58 PM 12 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: ^^^^^ Just admitted he’s on the side of terrorists. Told you. You believe hysterical right wing agitator accounts run by people in Yemen.
Niagara Bill Posted Tuesday at 07:06 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:06 PM (edited) This is an amazing debate. I am unsure how being left or right can have a different opinion on a subject that affects the very foundation of western society. 1. Why would anyone support easy bail, no bail for dangerous people, if you desire an organized safe, free society. You cannot be free if you have fear walking in your neighborhood. 2. Western society was born from values of European society, mostly Christian background, with similar work ethic, family values. It was infused with some Jewish religion. Most of North America was moderate in religious belief, choosing country over preachers most often, choosing respect over hatred. In some areas slavery became a blight, a wrong step, one society is still trying to fix, one we have struggled with and must learn from. But it was not a religious issue. 3. North America had disengaged from violent religions, choosing to tolerate, .... then came the hatred from the middle east, the100+ countries, at continuous war caused by their religion, where tolerance was considered weak, where hatred was king, where secularism was violent, where minorities controlled majority, where rights were restricted, where clerics fueled hatred, where Christians were not tolerated or welcomed, where the crusades never ended, where terrorism was worshiped. 4. Our society, wishing to show how cultured, secure, fair, loving and open we were left the gate open to the Trojan horse, to the hatred, to attacks. And still, our people, our courts, our politicians refuse to put North American society first. How can anyone not want to protect our society, our citizens, our modern way of life. How can we even for a moment think we should just absorb this hatred into our society. That is not to suggest many are not fine people. But one must remember, not one Christian is welcomed in most of those societies. 5.Both left and right need to care for our society first. When a mouse, or a rat sneaks into my house, poops all over, brings disease, lives off my food, in my clean house and breeds to the point I will be over run with numbers and filth...tolerating is the last thing I think of, whether I am left or right. Edited Tuesday at 07:10 PM by Niagara Bill 3
BillsFanNC Posted Tuesday at 07:12 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:12 PM Will Roundy be the next innocent victim of third world criminals allowed into our country by the very same marxists that he worships? Who knows, but it would indeed be apropos. 1 1
SectionC3 Posted Wednesday at 10:13 PM Posted Wednesday at 10:13 PM 2 hours ago, Big Blitz said: This is another problem. This nonsense of pointing to isolated actors and pretending that they stand for a group or that they embody a large group has got to stop. MAGA doesn't want to be labeled a certain way because of a few bad actors. Same deal here. This is another type of toxicity that has to end. 1
Wolfgang Posted Wednesday at 10:17 PM Posted Wednesday at 10:17 PM 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: This is another problem. This nonsense of pointing to isolated actors and pretending that they stand for a group or that they embody a large group has got to stop. MAGA doesn't want to be labeled a certain way because of a few bad actors. Same deal here. This is another type of toxicity that has to end.
Big Blitz Posted Wednesday at 10:40 PM Author Posted Wednesday at 10:40 PM 25 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: This is another problem. This nonsense of pointing to isolated actors and pretending that they stand for a group or that they embody a large group has got to stop. MAGA doesn't want to be labeled a certain way because of a few bad actors. Same deal here. This is another type of toxicity that has to end. No. They reflect their voters. So hateful - refused to stand and applaud at the SOTU for a kid with cancer. They do this bc they’re enabled. It’s what you want. 1 1 1
Tenhigh Posted Thursday at 12:17 AM Posted Thursday at 12:17 AM 2 hours ago, SectionC3 said: This is another problem. This nonsense of pointing to isolated actors and pretending that they stand for a group or that they embody a large group has got to stop. MAGA doesn't want to be labeled a certain way because of a few bad actors. Same deal here. This is another type of toxicity that has to end. I don't think I've ever been more in agreement with something you posted. We ALL need to remember it, let's all try to be better to each other. 1 1
Tenhigh Posted Thursday at 12:37 AM Posted Thursday at 12:37 AM 1 hour ago, Big Blitz said: No. They reflect their voters. So hateful - refused to stand and applaud at the SOTU for a kid with cancer. They do this bc they’re enabled. It’s what you want. Come on bro, there must be some Republicans who dont reflect your values...
SectionC3 Posted Thursday at 01:42 AM Posted Thursday at 01:42 AM On 9/9/2025 at 3:06 PM, Niagara Bill said: This is an amazing debate. I am unsure how being left or right can have a different opinion on a subject that affects the very foundation of western society. 1. Why would anyone support easy bail, no bail for dangerous people, if you desire an organized safe, free society. You cannot be free if you have fear walking in your neighborhood. This is very, very misleading. New York State has some bad bail laws. (And this is a Democrat saying this.) But those laws are not remotely close to "easy bail" or "no bail" for dangerous people. If you say otherwise, you don't know what you're talking about or you're intentionally misleading. The dialogue with bail, frankly, is part of this problem of misleading toxicity. I don't like the bail laws. I think there's not enough discretion for judges. But they're not anywhere near the blight that too many people have made them out to be. Candidly, Kathy Hochul was totally right about this in the recent article in the Buffalo News about this issue. We need better judges who spend time reading those laws and know how to use them. (Some of the worst offenders in that respect that I know, and I do this all the time, are Republicans.)
Big Blitz Posted Thursday at 01:50 AM Author Posted Thursday at 01:50 AM Mark Levin very forcefully and succinctly made the correct point just now: ”They killed Charlie Kirk????? Are you kidding me? Why? If they can resort to this??” Exactly. Now influencers are targets and that makes EVERYONE a target. 1
Recommended Posts