Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted


 

Newly declassified records from @DNIGabbard are additional, compelling evidence that the 2016 Russia Collusion narrative was not rooted in credible intelligence reporting, but manufactured to fit a preferred political narrative.

 

Gabbard has taken the rare and transparent step of declassifying a December 2016 draft of the President’s Daily Brief or PDB. 
 

This highly classified record, which is a daily national security analysis for the President, assessed that “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against (election) infrastructure.”

 

But after push back from the FBI, then led by James Comey, the PDB was spiked “based on new guidance.”

 

After a White House Principals meeting, a new intelligence assessment was commissioned, and media leaks followed, reinforcing a new narrative that “Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system.”

 

TIMELINE

 

December 8, 2016 
Draft PDB - Russia “did not impact US election results”

 

Hours later, FBI withdraws support

PDB is killed “based on new guidance”

 

December 9, 2016 Obama White House Gathers Top Cabinet Officials including Clapper, Brennan, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe and others.

 

New Intelligence Assessment is commissioned

 

January 6, 2017 New Intel Assessment : Russia interfered to help Trump

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted


 


 

But don’t forget about Epstein!!!

 

 

Because the media has already covered this scandal with the same veracity they have Trump and Epstein.  
 

Exact same scrutiny.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

Don’t worry.  We won’t ever forget Epstein!

 

In the meantime, more on the treason committed by Obama.  

 

 

 


Wait so you like Durham now?  So confused with the cult. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:


So she’s ok w pedophilia though. tulsi is a tool.  Deep state. 🤣

Still running around doxxing ICE agents Ned?

Posted

Using Tulsi Gabbard as a source is amazing. Can someone grab her qualifications for me again real quick 😂 

 

I’m certain that’s why nearly every article in the last month uses her title instead of her name since many folks assume the head of National Intelligence has any background in… well… Intelligence. Oh and doesn’t cozy up with some of the worlds most vile leaders. But alas, here we are. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, stevestojan said:

Using Tulsi Gabbard as a source is amazing. Can someone grab her qualifications for me again real quick 😂 

 

I’m certain that’s why nearly every article in the last month uses her title instead of her name since many folks assume the head of National Intelligence has any background in… well… Intelligence. Oh and doesn’t cozy up with some of the worlds most vile leaders. But alas, here we are. 


 

That’s exactly what Hillary wants you to say - you just couldn’t do it here bc you know you’ll sound like sheep.  
 

 

Ruuuuuuuuuuuusian asssssssssssset.    

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)


You mean they only jump to conclusions when leaked b.s. about Rs but if it’s legitimate sourcing that warrants scrutiny let alone draw perfectly fair conclusions on corrupt Ds - we’ll just ignore it?

 

 

That’s why Trumps Epstein strategy is brilliant.  

He would only be talking to his base.  

 

 

 

But Eppppppppppppstein!!!!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Big Blitz
×
×
  • Create New...