leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 17 Posted July 17 (edited) 55 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I'd just ignore you but my back issues playing up and I'm bored sitting around. Do you think maybe someone above her in Justice might have ordered her to filed the declaration or did this middling US attorney decide to do this on her own. She prosecuted both epstein and Maxwell. One died in prison and one is rotting away there. Seems she wass pretty good at her job. SCAPEGOAT!!!! one of trump's calling cards. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/16/maurene-comey-fired-doj-00458921?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR67MlRGaK6sdkMnNr7kYdyMMZtUsCS4XQ6PP9Jg3RMMYyKDnTrQnB7G5vQmyQ_aem_3KxNPH-8jxmuASkIpIhTEA Comey, who had worked in the U.S. attorney’s office for nearly a decade, prosecuted both Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. In recent weeks, President Donald Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi have faced a firestorm of criticism over their decision not to release additional files related to Epstein, the disgraced financier who was accused of running a child sex trafficking ring. Prosecutors in the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, including Comey, charged Epstein in 2019 with sex trafficking of minors. He died by suicide in jail while awaiting trial on those charges. Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking and sentenced to 20 years in prison. She is appealing her conviction. Wh was head of Justice in 2019? She was reportedly involved in the Diddy case and it ended up as sort of a debacle. Seems more likely it was just time to go. Edited July 17 by leh-nerd skin-erd 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 (edited) 25 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: She was reportedly involved in the Diddy case and it ended up as sort of a debacle. Seems more likely it was just time to go. He was convicted. trump is after her dad. Gateway Pundit spins it that she's evil. connect the dots. scapegoat. 53 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Why did she file to have the docs sealed x Edited July 17 by Joe Ferguson forever 1 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 17 Posted July 17 11 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: He was convicted. trump is after her dad. Gateway Pundit spins it that she's evil. connect the dots. scapegoat. He was convicted, but the feedback is that he was overcharged. I mean, she’s the government with an unlimited budget, no concerns about cost or any personal stake beyond her reputation. She might be a decent enough lawyer who just git caught up in the fame game, but she missed quite badly or so the story goes. Maybe you’re right and she just built the rest of the case for kicks. I believe she also serves at the pleasure of the admin and those folks are often sent packing. . Seems they gave her a chance as a legacy and she dropped the ball. if she can be fired, and they wanted her fired, she’s just another person who got fired. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: He was convicted, but the feedback is that he was overcharged. I mean, she’s the government with an unlimited budget, no concerns about cost or any personal stake beyond her reputation. She might be a decent enough lawyer who just git caught up in the fame game, but she missed quite badly or so the story goes. Maybe you’re right and she just built the rest of the case for kicks. I believe she also serves at the pleasure of the admin and those folks are often sent packing. . Seems they gave her a chance as a legacy and she dropped the ball. if she can be fired, and they wanted her fired, she’s just another person who got fired. Cmon. She was involved in the Epstein case. Up to her eyes. Wanna see the real deep state? Look at Barr. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 17 Posted July 17 15 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Cmon. She was involved in the Epstein case. Up to her eyes. Wanna see the real deep state? Look at Barr. I’m sure she had some successes as well, I’m just going by what is known. If they were lawfully able to terminate, nit much else to talk about. I’ve mentioned a friend I had at NYS AG office. He said new admin means some people get bounced. Just part of the deal. Barr was one of the hero’s of the day. Spoke passionately and truthfully on the weaponization of govt, spoke passionately in opposition to Trump when he felt it appropriate. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I’m sure she had some successes as well, I’m just going by what is known. If they were lawfully able to terminate, nit much else to talk about. I’ve mentioned a friend I had at NYS AG office. He said new admin means some people get bounced. Just part of the deal. Barr was one of the hero’s of the day. Spoke passionately and truthfully on the weaponization of govt, spoke passionately in opposition to Trump when he felt it appropriate. Why was she chosen for some of the highest profile cases recently. If every US atty was fired for a mixed verdict, there'd be none left. Barr is garbage but he does have a typical maga face, He couldn't be anything but maga.
Big Blitz Posted July 17 Author Posted July 17 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Why was she chosen for some of the highest profile cases recently. If every US atty was fired for a mixed verdict, there'd be none left. Barr is garbage but he does have a typical maga face, He couldn't be anything but maga. Barr sucks but she’s good at her job. Roger that. Oh yea. The reveal of the files is going to send libs into Deep State places they never knew existed. 1
TH3 Posted July 17 Posted July 17 2 hours ago, Big Blitz said: This will take time. But the truth libs are going to deny will come out. For maximum damage, you don’t do this during the summer - which is why my guess the leak happened. You do it - during election season. Comical how maga cheers every doofus move by their cult leader ….somehow straining to find some sort of 4d chess magic to it all …useful idiots maga… that’s you 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 6 minutes ago, TH3 said: Comical how maga cheers every doofus move by their cult leader ….somehow straining to find some sort of 4d chess magic to it all …useful idiots maga… that’s you but they see conspiracies in contrails.... 1
SectionC3 Posted July 17 Posted July 17 15 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Barr sucks but she’s good at her job. Roger that. Oh yea. The reveal of the files is going to send libs into Deep State places they never knew existed. Not having seen the files, what gives you that idea? 49 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: He was convicted, but the feedback is that he was overcharged. I mean, she’s the government with an unlimited budget, no concerns about cost or any personal stake beyond her reputation. She might be a decent enough lawyer who just git caught up in the fame game, but she missed quite badly or so the story goes. Maybe you’re right and she just built the rest of the case for kicks. I believe she also serves at the pleasure of the admin and those folks are often sent packing. . Seems they gave her a chance as a legacy and she dropped the ball. if she can be fired, and they wanted her fired, she’s just another person who got fired. The timing is quite coincidental, is it not? 1
Big Blitz Posted July 17 Author Posted July 17 2 minutes ago, TH3 said: Comical how maga cheers every doofus move by their cult leader ….somehow straining to find some sort of 4d chess magic to it all …useful idiots maga… that’s you Comical how the left condemns every single thing he does. Kinda discredits you over everything. Much more so than your belief in 67 genders.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 maybe she'll shed some light on the files. risky play donnie.
Big Blitz Posted July 17 Author Posted July 17 15 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: maybe she'll shed some light on the files. risky play donnie. Exactly why none of this “Trump is guilty” or covering for the truly guilty people makes any sense. It’s not logical.
nedboy7 Posted July 17 Posted July 17 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Exactly why none of this “Trump is guilty” or covering for the truly guilty people makes any sense. It’s not logical. It doesn’t make sense you worship a pedo. But here we are. Edited July 17 by nedboy7 1
Big Blitz Posted July 17 Author Posted July 17 4 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: It doesn’t make sense you worship a pedo. But here we are. You’re a moron: All photos of them together are from before 2003 - why? -In 2004 Trump not only barred Epstein from Mar-a-lago estate, he also placed a bid on property (and won) in Palm Beach that Epstein was looking to purchase. -In 2005 Trump revealed Epstein secrets to PBSCO investigation. -In 2006, two of Epstein’s victims confirmed they knew Trump had barred Epstein from his estate in mar-a-lago. -In 2009 Bradley Edwards (Prosecutor on the Epstein case) made a public statement that Trump was the only individual who helped in the prosecutions against Epstein. -Per victim testimonies on the newly released Epstein/Maxwell documents reveal that Trump was not seen on Epstein’s island or anywhere with Epstein. In 2018 Bradley Edwards, an attorney who represented a number of those who claimed Epstein was involved in their abuse, spoke about the financer's relationship with Trump during an interview with Derrick Broze of The Conscious Resistance Network, a self-styled "independent media organization" that claims to work "to create a world where corporate and state power does not rule over the lives of free human beings." Asked about Epstein's relationship with Trump he replied: "The only thing I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who in 2009, when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people that I wanted to talk to them, he is the only person who picked up the phone and said 'lets just talk, I'll give you as much time as you want, I'll tell you what you need to know.' https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-victims-attorney-talks-about-donald-trump-claims-1857298 Trump is correct. The Democrats were trying to use Epstein to take down Trump in 2016 - got nowhere - then early in 2024 tried to again but got nowhere. Because nothing is there.
Big Blitz Posted July 17 Author Posted July 17 (edited) As is still true today. MAGA is pushing for a grand reveal of deep state corruption. Democrats are pushing for a grand reveal of Trump being a pedo. The latter isn’t true and the former looks like there isn’t enough there, there. Or, Trump has determined like the files were used to defame him, it will happen to others. Who used Epstein money and business dealings, but aren’t guilty of even knowing about the island sick stuff let alone be a part of it. Edited July 17 by Big Blitz 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 51 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Exactly why none of this “Trump is guilty” or covering for the truly guilty people makes any sense. It’s not logical.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 17 Posted July 17 9 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Why was she chosen for some of the highest profile cases recently. If every US atty was fired for a mixed verdict, there'd be none left. Barr is garbage but he does have a typical maga face, He couldn't be anything but maga. Potential reasons…Qualifications and reputation. Experience with the case being pursued. Political connections and favoritism. Seniority. The Garland DOJ liked her and/or her work. Privilege. US attorneys are fired or asked to resign for a variety of reasons, including change in administration and leadership in the DOJ. It actually seems pretty common. 9 hours ago, SectionC3 said: The timing is quite coincidental, is it not? I would think it was just a matter of time when Trump returned to the White House, beyond any issues we may not know about. But yes, coincidental to all the hubbub around the Epstein case lately. 1
ComradeKayAdams Posted July 17 Posted July 17 On 7/15/2025 at 11:13 PM, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Answer to Q1: Irrelevant. The T-shirt likely was made in China. #irony #hotgirlssupportingservitude Beyond that, he definitely seems to be interested in her vector fields, but it has in has nothing to do with the t-shirt. Overalls from Walmart and golf shoes would probably work just as well. I can’t speak to closed curves, I’m a gentleman first. Answer to Q2: Doesn’t matter. When you buy cheap goods from far-off lands, your emotional baggage is packed with shame and self-loathing. Oh—had to visit the doctor a couple weeks back. The nurse asked me to step in the scale, shoes and all, and recorded my weight. Checking my records, I see they logged in my weight fully clothed. Pushed my BMI over 25. I may find a new doctor. Complete b-s. I’m sorry to hear about your terrible experience with your doctor. Such is the nature of America’s private health care system. Under Pramila Jayapal’s Medicare for All Act of 2023 (H.R. 3421), all BMI’s would be calculated sans shoes and clothes. Now before I begin grading your quiz, let’s briefly address your subpar posting record in this thread. We’re talking about justice for sexual abuse victims, Leh-nerd, and the prevention of any additional abuse from wealthy and powerful pedophiles. The Epstein files transcend politics. You need to be challenging your creepy MAGA forum friends with greater moral conviction. PPP is not supposed to stand for “Pedophiles, Perverts, and Porn addicts.” If anything, it should be “Posh Pulchritude for Progressives!” And on that note, let’s get to grading your math quiz concerning my bloody Zohran shirts… << pulls out menacing red pen >> << adjusts reading glasses >> << sets default facial expression to one of expected disappointment >> Hmmm…these are actually good responses, Leh-nerd!! You are 100% correct to figure that I’d be perturbed with any foreign labor exploitation that went into the t-shirt production. You truly understand the “Tao of Kay,” so may our friendship live on for at least another day! Hmmm…your answers are actually better than mine because yours don’t make me come across as so shallow... KAY’S OFFICIAL ANSWER KEY FOR LEH-NERD’S FRIENDSHIP QUIZ #2: Step 1: Note that Stokes’s Theorem has no relevance to combinatorial math questions. Another mathematical red herring proffered by Kay? More mathematical mischief afoot?? Yes, indeedy…but do note that this particular version of the theorem technically gives the answer away!!! Step 2: Note that Kay would NEVER wear a t-shirt or crop top out in public if she ballooned to a Leh-nerd-like BMI of 24.8. Knowing Kay (which is the whole point of the quiz), she probably wouldn’t be caught out in public at all looking so supersized. MAYBE wearing an oversized coat and baggy jeans in an emergency outing…? Anyway, the answer to Q1 is “ZERO combinations.” Step 3: Same reasoning as above for Q2… “ZERO combinations.” Alternate Step 2: If you want to practice your combinatorial math, Leh-nerd, Q1 is a basic “choose 5 from 10” problem where the order is not important: 10! / (5!5!) = (10*9*8*7*6*5!) / (5*4*3*2*5!) = 30240 / 120 = 252 shirt style combinations. Alternate Step 3: Note that blood and bleach would ruin the yellow, blue, and grey crop tops. You could still use the red and white ones judiciously, however. So Q2 becomes a “choose 5 from 7” problem: 7! / (2!5!) = (7*6*5!) / (2*5!) = 42 / 2 = 21 shirt style combinations. Congrats, dude! You passed! << punches Leh-nerd anyway for trying to show up Kay with nobler quiz answers >>
JFKjr Posted July 17 Posted July 17 11 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Cmon. She was involved in the Epstein case. Up to her eyes. Wanna see the real deep state? Look at Barr. Yes. Are you referring to the connection with his father, Donald Barr?
Recommended Posts