CincyBillsFan Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said: And even more elementary than that, you should understand the difference between the meaning of the words, "would" and "could." Also, you should understand the importance of owning what you say instead of weaseling out of it through equivocation and rationalization. What I said was that not resigning Hollins would be the straw that broke the camels back, "IF and it's still a big IF, the Bills fall apart and miss he playoffs". And I believe this and am not backing away one inch. If you want to play GOTCHA go ahead and have at it but at least use the entire sentence I posted to complain about whether or not I should have said "could" instead of "would". Quote
Sierra Foothills Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago (edited) 18 hours ago, CincyBillsFan said: What I said was that not resigning Hollins would be the straw that broke the camels back, "IF and it's still a big IF, the Bills fall apart and miss he playoffs". And I believe this and am not backing away one inch. If you want to play GOTCHA go ahead and have at it but at least use the entire sentence I posted to complain about whether or not I should have said "could" instead of "would". As in your earlier posts about Joe Brady, you have a tendency to use vague language and then change the meaning to suit the moment. It takes the form of "that's not what I meant." Edited 1 hour ago by Sierra Foothills 1 Quote
Psautcsk Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 8 hours ago, BuffaloBillyG said: Of all the bad decisions and missed picks Beane has had, not re-signing Mack Hollins isn't going to be what costs him his job. From the sounds of it, they made Hollins an offer and it was Hollins's choice to head to New England. Maybe Hollins and his representative told the Bills the offer the Patriots made and Beane passed. Maybe Hollins got the offer and jumped on it. But no one can force a guy to stay if he wants to go. Maybe Hollins thought the Pats were on a different trajectory than the Bills. 1 Quote
BullBuchanan Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) On 11/14/2025 at 10:38 PM, steven50 said: Andree Reed was the most productive Bills receiver in history not Diggs. Diggs ranks around 5th Andre Reed never even had a back to back 1000 yard season. Diggs topped Reed's career best season twice in 4 years, and is the only Buffalo Bill with 4 consecutive 1000 yard seasons. The only thing Reed has on Diggs is he played here longer. Also, over his last seven years, across 11 playoff games, reed averaged 42 YPG and had 0 touchdowns. Edited 6 hours ago by BullBuchanan Quote
Dunkirk Donski Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, BullBuchanan said: Andre Reed never even had a back to back 1000 yard season. Diggs topped Reed's career best season twice in 4 years, and is the only Buffalo Bill with 4 consecutive 1000 yard seasons. The only thing Reed has on Diggs is he played here longer. Also, over his last seven years, across 11 playoff games, reed averaged 42 YPG and had 0 touchdowns. It’s quite possible I watched every game Reed played…I had no idea he never went b2b 1000 yrd seasons. Stay sober my friends Quote
The Jokeman Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 35 minutes ago, Dunkirk Donski said: It’s quite possible I watched every game Reed played…I had no idea he never went b2b 1000 yrd seasons. Stay sober my friends It's not soberness it's over valuing the greatness of times gone by. Everybody remembers Doug Flutie at times in 1998 but everyone wants to forget how bad he was in parts of 1998 and most of 1999. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.